[issue36207] robotsparser deny all with some rules
wats0ns added the comment: I can't find a documentation about it, but all of the robots.txt checkers I find behave like this. You can test on this site: http://www.eskimoz.fr/robots.txt, I believe that this is how it's implemented now in most parsers ? -- nosy: +quentin-maire ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue36207> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue36207] robotsparser deny all with some rules
wats0ns added the comment: I can't find a documentation about it, but all of the robots.txt checkers I find behave like this. You can test on this site: http://www.eskimoz.fr/robots.txt, I believe that this is how it's implemented now in most parsers ? -- ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue36207> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue36207] robotsparser deny all with some rules
New submission from wats0ns : RobotsParser parse a "Disallow: ?" rule as a deny all, but this is a valid rule that should be interpreted as "Disallow: /?*" or "Disallow: /*?*" -- components: Library (Lib) messages: 337285 nosy: quentin-maire priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: robotsparser deny all with some rules type: behavior versions: Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker <https://bugs.python.org/issue36207> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
