New submission from Ben Bass <benb...@codedstructure.net>:
The new SIGINT behaviour of pdb.Pdb prevents use of pdb within a non-main
thread without explicitly setting nosigint=True. Specifically the 'continue'
command causes a traceback as follows:
{{{
...
File
"/Library/Frameworks/Python.framework/Versions/3.2/lib/python3.2/pdb.py", line
959, in do_continue
signal.signal(signal.SIGINT, self.sigint_handler)
ValueError: signal only works in main thread
}}}
Since the new behaviour seems to be to gain an enhancement rather than anything
fundamentally necessary to pdb, wouldn't it be better if the default was
reversed, so the same code would work identically on Python 3.1 (and
potentially earlier, i.e. Python2) and Python 3.2?
At the moment in my codebase (rpcpdb) I'm using inspect.getargspec sniffing for
nosigint on pdb.Pdb.__init__ to determine whether to include a nosigint=True
parameter, which clearly isn't ideal!
----------
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 145040
nosy: bpb
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Default nosigint optionto pdb.Pdb() prevents use in non-main thread
type: behavior
versions: Python 3.2
_______________________________________
Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org>
<http://bugs.python.org/issue13120>
_______________________________________
_______________________________________________
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
