[issue13861] test_pydoc failure

2012-02-03 Thread Éric Araujo 

Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:

I have the same one on Debian testing:

==
FAIL: test_apropos_with_bad_package (test.test_pydoc.PydocImportTest)
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File test/test_pydoc.py, line 403, in test_apropos_with_bad_package
self.assertEqual(b'', result)
AssertionError: b'' != b'docutils.parsers.null - A do-nothing 
parser.\ndocutils.writers.null - A do-nothing Writer.'

==
FAIL: test_apropos_with_unreadable_dir (test.test_pydoc.PydocImportTest)
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File test/test_pydoc.py, line 413, in test_apropos_with_unreadable_dir
self.assertEqual(b'', result)
AssertionError: b'' != b'docutils.parsers.null - A do-nothing 
parser.\ndocutils.writers.null - A do-nothing Writer.'


docutils is the first package that’s found in my user site-packages; can you 
tell if your Crypto package is in that same location?

--
nosy: +eric.araujo
versions: +Python 3.2

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue13861
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue13861] test_pydoc failure

2012-02-03 Thread Stefan Krah 

Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org added the comment:

Eric Araujo rep...@bugs.python.org wrote:
 docutils is the first package that???s found in my user site-packages;
 can you tell if your Crypto package is in that same location?

The package is here:

/usr/local/lib/python3.3/site-packages/Crypto/SelfTest/Protocol/test_AllOrNothing.py

The tests are (naturally) run in the cpython repo, but
/usr/local/lib/python3.3/site-packages is in sys.path.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue13861
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue13861] test_pydoc failure

2012-02-03 Thread Éric Araujo 

Éric Araujo mer...@netwok.org added the comment:

Adding Ned, who refactored these tests, to nosy.

--
nosy: +ned.deily

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue13861
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue13861] test_pydoc failure

2012-02-03 Thread Roundup Robot 

Roundup Robot devn...@psf.upfronthosting.co.za added the comment:

New changeset e5f2c04055a2 by Ned Deily in branch '2.7':
Issue #13861: Prevent test_apropos* test case failures in test_pydoc.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/e5f2c04055a2

New changeset 5eb47e1732a0 by Ned Deily in branch '3.2':
Issue #13861: Prevent test_apropos* test case failures in test_pydoc.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/5eb47e1732a0

New changeset ff230e366610 by Ned Deily in branch 'default':
Issue #13861: merge
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/ff230e366610

--
nosy: +python-dev

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue13861
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue13861] test_pydoc failure

2012-02-03 Thread Ned Deily 

Ned Deily n...@acm.org added the comment:

For the as-yet unreleased changes for Issue7425, I added some test cases for 
pydoc -k (apropos) and chose a keyword of nothing, a keyword which has no 
hits in the standard library.  Unfortunately, you both installed third-party 
packages that *do* have hits for nothing.  Cute!  I've now changed the 
keyword to a nonsense one which I hope will have a zero probability of getting 
a hit.

--
assignee:  - ned.deily
resolution:  - fixed
stage: needs patch - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
versions: +Python 2.7

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue13861
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue13861] test_pydoc failure

2012-01-25 Thread Stefan Krah 

New submission from Stefan Krah stefan-use...@bytereef.org:

test_pydoc fails on Ubuntu Lucid:

==
FAIL: test_apropos_with_bad_package (test.test_pydoc.PydocImportTest)
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /home/stefan/pydev/cpython/Lib/test/test_pydoc.py, line 409, in 
test_apropos_with_bad_package
self.assertEqual(b'', result)
AssertionError: b'' != b'Crypto.Protocol.AllOrNothing - This file implements 
all-or-nothing package 
transformations.\nCrypto.SelfTest.Protocol.test_AllOrNothing'

==
FAIL: test_apropos_with_unreadable_dir (test.test_pydoc.PydocImportTest)
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File /home/stefan/pydev/cpython/Lib/test/test_pydoc.py, line 419, in 
test_apropos_with_unreadable_dir
self.assertEqual(b'', result)
AssertionError: b'' != b'Crypto.Protocol.AllOrNothing - This file implements 
all-or-nothing package 
transformations.\nCrypto.SelfTest.Protocol.test_AllOrNothing'

--

--
components: Tests
messages: 151962
nosy: skrah
priority: normal
severity: normal
stage: needs patch
status: open
title: test_pydoc failure
type: behavior
versions: Python 3.3

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue13861
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com