[issue1501] 0 ** 0 documentation
Georg Brandl added the comment: Fixed in r59774. -- assignee: facundobatista - georg.brandl nosy: +georg.brandl resolution: - fixed status: open - closed __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1501 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1501] 0 ** 0 documentation
Changes by Facundo Batista: -- assignee: - facundobatista nosy: +facundobatista __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1501 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1501] 0 ** 0 documentation
New submission from Jim Jewett: http://docs.python.org/lib/typesnumeric.html contains a table listing the mathematical operators. Please add a note to the final row (x ** y meaning x to the power y) indicating that Python has chosen to define 0**0==1 Note 6: Python defines 0**0 to be 1. For background, please see http:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exponentiation#Zero_to_the_zero_power This doc change should have prevented issue 1461; I *think* there have been similar issues in the past. -- components: Documentation messages: 57855 nosy: jimjjewett severity: minor status: open title: 0 ** 0 documentation type: rfe versions: Python 2.5 __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1501 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1501] 0 ** 0 documentation
Guido van Rossum added the comment: (Can you also submit a doc fix that would have prevented issue 1500? :-) -- nosy: +gvanrossum priority: - low __ Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://bugs.python.org/issue1501 __ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
