[issue15439] Include Misc/ACKS names into the documentation

2012-09-13 Thread Roundup Robot

Roundup Robot added the comment:

New changeset 48185b0f7b8a by Ezio Melotti in branch '3.2':
#15437, #15439: merge Doc/ACKS.txt with Misc/ACKS and modify Doc/about.rst 
accordingly.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/48185b0f7b8a

New changeset 2b4a89f82485 by Ezio Melotti in branch 'default':
#15437, #15439: merge with 3.2.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/2b4a89f82485

New changeset 76dd082d332e by Ezio Melotti in branch '2.7':
#15437, #15439: merge Doc/ACKS.txt with Misc/ACKS and modify Doc/about.rst 
accordingly.
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/76dd082d332e

--
nosy: +python-dev

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15439
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue15439] Include Misc/ACKS names into the documentation

2012-09-13 Thread Ezio Melotti

Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com:


--
assignee: docs@python - ezio.melotti
resolution:  - fixed
stage: needs patch - committed/rejected
status: open - closed
type:  - enhancement
versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.3

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15439
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue15439] Include Misc/ACKS names into the documentation

2012-07-27 Thread Tshepang Lekhonkhobe

Changes by Tshepang Lekhonkhobe tshep...@gmail.com:


--
nosy: +tshepang

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15439
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue15439] Include Misc/ACKS names into the documentation

2012-07-27 Thread Antoine Pitrou

Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment:

 OK, I propose to completely drop the Doc/ACKS.txt from the documentation, and 
 replace it with the words

Sounds good to me.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15439
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue15439] Include Misc/ACKS names into the documentation

2012-07-27 Thread Terry J. Reedy

Terry J. Reedy tjre...@udel.edu added the comment:

I agree with Martin also. A short paragraph and link to the (combined) online 
file is quite sufficient. There is no need for the file to be in offline 
copies. And I would make the change in all current versions.

--
nosy: +terry.reedy

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15439
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue15439] Include Misc/ACKS names into the documentation

2012-07-25 Thread Martin v . Löwis

Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:

I don't know how Doc ACKS is maintained, but I think the devguide is fine as it 
stands, whether or not Doc ACKS is preserved or not. People should put 
themselves into Misc/ACKS if they made a contribution, period.

If people need to be acknowledged separately for contributing to the 
documentation, I think only major contributions (such as writing the 
documentation for a yet-undocumented module) should be explicitly acknowledged.

I think this all started from the documentation having initially Guido van 
Rossum given as its sole author, and then later Fred Drake. So Doc/ACKS.txt may 
have been an attempt to correct the impression that these two are the authors, 
but I think it went into the wrong direction (eventually leading to the 
creation of issues such as this one)

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15439
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue15439] Include Misc/ACKS names into the documentation

2012-07-25 Thread Ezio Melotti

Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com added the comment:

FWIW including Misc/ACKS in the doc will probably break the generation of the 
pdf version of the doc, since it contains non-latin1 characters (see 
msg166408).  I don't think it's necessary to include the names in the doc.

 I don't know how Doc ACKS is maintained, but I think the devguide is
 fine as it stands, whether or not Doc ACKS is preserved or not. 
 People should put themselves into Misc/ACKS if they made a 
 contribution, period.

In my experience Doc/ACKS.txt is mostly ignored/unmaintained.  I did a lot of 
work on the docs and my name is not in there, and I don't think I ever added 
anyone there.

 If people need to be acknowledged separately for contributing to the
 documentation, I think only major contributions (such as writing the 
 documentation for a yet-undocumented module) should be explicitly 
 acknowledged.

It's already possible to give credit directly in the docs using directives like 
sectionauthor.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15439
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue15439] Include Misc/ACKS names into the documentation

2012-07-25 Thread Martin v . Löwis

Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:

OK, I propose to completely drop the Doc/ACKS.txt from the documentation, and 
replace it with the words

Many people have contributed to the Python language, the Python standard 
library, and the Python documentation. See Misc/ACKS in the Python source 
distribution for a partial list of contributors

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15439
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue15439] Include Misc/ACKS names into the documentation

2012-07-24 Thread Chris Jerdonek

New submission from Chris Jerdonek chris.jerdo...@gmail.com:

This issue is to include the names in Misc/ACKS into the documentation --
in place of the names from Doc/ACKS.txt.  This was mentioned in the
discussion for issue 15437, which is to add the names from Doc/ACKS.txt
into Misc/ACKS.

This issue should be done shortly after issue 15437.  The current issue
can include (1) converting Misc/ACKS into rst format, (2) deleting
DOC/ACKS.txt (after confirming that any changes since issue 15437 are
reflected in Misc/ACKS), and (3) resolving the intros in the two files
with about.rst's surrounding text so that the text makes sense when
included into the main documentation.

Should Guido's note of acknowledgment in Misc/ACKS be included as is?
And should a new Python Acknowledgments section be added to the docs,
or is it okay for this more general acknowledgment to be included in the
section called About these documents?  If the former, the About these
documents section could link to the more general Python
Acknowledgments section to reference documentation contributors.

--
assignee: docs@python
components: Documentation
keywords: easy
messages: 166279
nosy: cjerdonek, docs@python, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, georg.brandl, jcea, 
pitrou
priority: normal
severity: normal
stage: needs patch
status: open
title: Include Misc/ACKS names into the documentation

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15439
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue15439] Include Misc/ACKS names into the documentation

2012-07-24 Thread Chris Jerdonek

Changes by Chris Jerdonek chris.jerdo...@gmail.com:


--
dependencies: +Merge Doc/ACKS and Misc/ACKS

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15439
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue15439] Include Misc/ACKS names into the documentation

2012-07-24 Thread Martin v . Löwis

Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:

-1. Misc/ACKS is fine where it is. No need to include it into the docs.

--
nosy: +loewis

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15439
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue15439] Include Misc/ACKS names into the documentation

2012-07-24 Thread Chris Jerdonek

Chris Jerdonek chris.jerdo...@gmail.com added the comment:

Martin, just to be sure, this is to be done after issue 15437 (a dependency), 
and the location of Misc/ACKS will not change.  Have you already read the 
discussion there?  Éric said that he recalled it was Georg's preference to do 
this if Doc/ACKS.txt is removed.  (I personally have no opinion.)

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15439
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue15439] Include Misc/ACKS names into the documentation

2012-07-24 Thread Martin v . Löwis

Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:

Ok, please rephrase: what do you mean by inlude ... into ...? If the place of 
Misc/ACKS doesn't change, in what way is it being included into something? And 
which documentation is it being included into, if it doesn't change its 
location?

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15439
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue15439] Include Misc/ACKS names into the documentation

2012-07-24 Thread Serhiy Storchaka

Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com added the comment:

 Ok, please rephrase: what do you mean by inlude ... into ...?

http://docs.python.org/about.html#contributors-to-the-python-documentation

--
nosy: +storchaka

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15439
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue15439] Include Misc/ACKS names into the documentation

2012-07-24 Thread Martin v . Löwis

Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:

I see; I'm changing my vote to -0 then. I don't think this list of names should 
have been included in the documentation in the first place. Since it is, 
providing the full list of contributors is just as fine.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15439
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue15439] Include Misc/ACKS names into the documentation

2012-07-24 Thread Chris Jerdonek

Chris Jerdonek chris.jerdo...@gmail.com added the comment:

The second sense of the word include is in the possible implementation.  Éric 
pointed out in the other issue's thread that this can be achieved by modifying 
the existing include directive, for example--

--- a/Doc/about.rst
+++ b/Doc/about.rst
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
 documentation, or Python itself.
 
 .. including the ACKS file here so that it can be maintained separately
-.. include:: ACKS.txt
+.. include:: ../Misc/ACKS

The details of the surrounding text still need to be worked out though so that 
it reads right.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15439
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue15439] Include Misc/ACKS names into the documentation

2012-07-24 Thread Martin v . Löwis

Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de added the comment:

I think Guido's wording should be included literally in the online version. It 
very much explains what this list really is and how to interpret it. The post 
scriptum should be converted into a ReST comment, since it is primarily a note 
to maintainers.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15439
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue15439] Include Misc/ACKS names into the documentation

2012-07-24 Thread Raymond Hettinger

Raymond Hettinger raymond.hettin...@gmail.com added the comment:

I agree with Martin and don't think the ACKS list should be exposed further 
than it already is.

--
nosy: +rhettinger

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15439
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue15439] Include Misc/ACKS names into the documentation

2012-07-24 Thread Chris Jerdonek

Chris Jerdonek chris.jerdo...@gmail.com added the comment:

Is that a -0 then, Raymond?

I think either the combined Misc/ACKS list should be included in the docs, or 
it should be removed entirely.  If what Meador said is true (that people 
already in Misc/ACKS who contribute documentation should not be added)--

 Doc/ACKS.txt is *only* for acknowledging documentation contributions.  Serhiy 
 is already in Misc/ACKS.  No need to add him to Doc/ACKS.txt.

http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-July/121093.html

Then it's not clear to me why the current docs list is meaningful and what 
exactly it represents.  At the least, the description of the list on the page 
doesn't match the stated practice.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15439
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue15439] Include Misc/ACKS names into the documentation

2012-07-24 Thread Meador Inge

Meador Inge mead...@gmail.com added the comment:

What I meant by that was that Serhiy contributed a code change and was already 
in Misc/ACKS, therefore no ACKS file should have been updated.  I didn't mean 
to imply that someone can't be in both files.  My impression is that Misc/ACKS 
is for code contributions and Docs/ACKS.txt is for documentation contributions.

--
nosy: +meador.inge

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15439
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue15439] Include Misc/ACKS names into the documentation

2012-07-24 Thread Chris Jerdonek

Chris Jerdonek chris.jerdo...@gmail.com added the comment:

Okay, thanks for clarifying.  Then I have no strong opinion.

However, if Doc/ACKS.txt is retained, then I think the Dev Guide should mention 
Doc/ACKS.txt just as it mentions Misc/ACKS:

http://docs.python.org/devguide/patch.html#preparation

And it should include instructions for when to update which files, and the 
patchcheck script should be suitably modified.  With only ~230 names versus 
Misc/ACKS's ~1160 , I'm surprised that Doc/ACKS.txt does not have more names -- 
especially given that it's not uncommon for documentation changes to accompany 
code changes (or so one might think).

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue15439
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com