[issue1631394] sre module has misleading docs

2008-01-26 Thread Georg Brandl 

Georg Brandl added the comment:

Thanks, committed r60136.

_
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1631394
_
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list 
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue1631394] sre module has misleading docs

2008-01-26 Thread Tom Lynn 

Tom Lynn added the comment:

Nice changes to the wording. (For the record: it's r60316 in fact.)

_
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1631394
_
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list 
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue1631394] sre module has misleading docs

2008-01-25 Thread Tom Lynn 

Tom Lynn added the comment:

Thanks for fixing this. I now also note that (?=...), (?!...) and (?
(id/name)yes-pattern|no-pattern) aren't documented, and nor is finditer 
in the main docstring.

The attached patch fixes these, as well as what looks like mistaken 
formatting on one line. Some of the proposed lines are a bit long for 
help(re), but they're hard to shorten.

Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file9284/undoc-patch.txt

_
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1631394
_
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list 
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com

[issue1631394] sre module has misleading docs

2008-01-21 Thread Georg Brandl 

Georg Brandl added the comment:

Clarified in r60164.

--
assignee: effbot - georg.brandl
resolution:  - fixed
status: open - closed

_
Tracker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://bugs.python.org/issue1631394
_
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list 
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com