[issue17638] test_ssl failure

2013-04-06 Thread Charles-François Natali

Charles-François Natali added the comment:

 I don't know how to handle this in a non-hackish way, except by just ignoring 
 the issue :-)

Sound fine to me :)

--
resolution:  - invalid
stage:  - committed/rejected
status: open - closed

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17638
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue17638] test_ssl failure

2013-04-05 Thread Charles-François Natali

New submission from Charles-François Natali:

test_ssl is failing on one the NetBSD buildbots:
http://buildbot.python.org/all/builders/x86%20NetBSD%205.1.2%20%5BSB%5D%203.x/builds/1129/steps/test/logs/stdio


==
ERROR: test_options (test.test_ssl.ContextTests)
--
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File 
/home/cpython/buildslave/3.x.snakebite-netbsd51-x86-1/build/Lib/test/test_ssl.py,
 line 87, in f
return func(*args, **kwargs)
  File 
/home/cpython/buildslave/3.x.snakebite-netbsd51-x86-1/build/Lib/test/test_ssl.py,
 line 420, in test_options
ctx.options = (ctx.options  ~ssl.OP_NO_SSLv2) | ssl.OP_NO_TLSv1
ValueError: can't clear options before OpenSSL 0.9.8m


Antoine, I think I saw commits from you some time ago to deal with this SSL 
version thing...

--
components: Tests
keywords: buildbot
messages: 186066
nosy: neologix, pitrou
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: test_ssl failure
type: behavior

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17638
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue17638] test_ssl failure

2013-04-05 Thread Antoine Pitrou

Antoine Pitrou added the comment:

Well, that exception is raised when the OpenSSL version doesn't have the 
HAVE_SSL_CTX_CLEAR_OPTIONS macro, which appeared in 0.9.8m. But the OpenSSL 
version on that buildbot identifies itself as OpenSSL 0.9.9-dev 09 May 2008, 
which is logically posterior to 0.9.8m. I don't know how to handle this in a 
non-hackish way, except by just ignoring the issue :-)

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue17638
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com