[issue22891] code removal from urllib.parse.urlsplit()

2021-05-18 Thread Gregory P. Smith


Gregory P. Smith  added the comment:

There are still a lot of cleanliness and even logical issues lurking within 
urllib.parse.  But this bug is dated and other changes have happened since.  
I'm closing it as out of date.  Open new issues for specific action items.

--
nosy: +gregory.p.smith
resolution:  -> out of date
stage: patch review -> resolved
status: open -> closed

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue22891] code removal from urllib.parse.urlsplit()

2019-10-18 Thread Senthil Kumaran


Senthil Kumaran  added the comment:


New changeset 0f3187c1ce3b3ace60f6c1691dfa3d4e744f0384 by Senthil Kumaran in 
branch '3.8':
[3.8] bpo-27657: Fix urlparse() with numeric paths (GH-661) (#16839)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/0f3187c1ce3b3ace60f6c1691dfa3d4e744f0384


--

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue22891] code removal from urllib.parse.urlsplit()

2019-10-18 Thread Senthil Kumaran


Change by Senthil Kumaran :


--
pull_requests: +16391
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/16839

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue22891] code removal from urllib.parse.urlsplit()

2019-10-18 Thread miss-islington


miss-islington  added the comment:


New changeset 82b5f6b16e051f8a2ac6e87ba86b082fa1c4a77f by Miss Islington (bot) 
in branch '3.7':
bpo-27657: Fix urlparse() with numeric paths (GH-661)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/82b5f6b16e051f8a2ac6e87ba86b082fa1c4a77f


--
nosy: +miss-islington

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue22891] code removal from urllib.parse.urlsplit()

2019-10-18 Thread miss-islington


Change by miss-islington :


--
pull_requests: +16385
pull_request: https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/16837

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue22891] code removal from urllib.parse.urlsplit()

2019-10-18 Thread Senthil Kumaran


Senthil Kumaran  added the comment:


New changeset 5a88d50ff013a64fbdb25b877c87644a9034c969 by Senthil Kumaran (Tim 
Graham) in branch 'master':
bpo-27657: Fix urlparse() with numeric paths (#661)
https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/5a88d50ff013a64fbdb25b877c87644a9034c969


--

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue22891] code removal from urllib.parse.urlsplit()

2017-03-14 Thread Tim Graham

Tim Graham added the comment:

I sent a pull request for this issue's dependency (issue 27657) and added a 
second commit there with this patch. A test added in the first commit 
demonstrates that removing this code no longer results in the behavior change 
described in msg238254.

--
nosy: +Tim.Graham
pull_requests: +549

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue22891] code removal from urllib.parse.urlsplit()

2016-07-30 Thread Martin Panter

Martin Panter added the comment:

Issue 27657 has been opened about the quirk with numeric URLs

--
dependencies: +urlparse fails if the path is numeric

___
Python tracker 

___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue22891] code removal from urllib.parse.urlsplit()

2015-03-16 Thread Martin Panter

Martin Panter added the comment:

The patch seems sensible. The only behaviour change I can forsee would be the 
odd case of http:1234 no longer being parsed like this:

 urlsplit(http:1234)
SplitResult(scheme='http', netloc='', path='1234', query='', fragment='')

Instead it would be parsed the same as HTTP:1234 (or tel:1234!):

 urlsplit(HTTP:1234)
SplitResult(scheme='', netloc='', path='HTTP:1234', query='', fragment='')

If optimizing for “http:” really is important, it might still be done without 
the code duplication. Other options might be factoring a subroutine, using 
str.strip(), set.issubset(), or regular expressions.

--
nosy: +vadmium

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22891
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue22891] code removal from urllib.parse.urlsplit()

2014-11-18 Thread Alexander Todorov

Alexander Todorov added the comment:

 Does test cases pass after removal of those lines? (I will be surprised) 

Yes they do. Also see my detailed explanation above, there's no reason for test 
cases to fail.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22891
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue22891] code removal from urllib.parse.urlsplit()

2014-11-17 Thread Berker Peksag

Changes by Berker Peksag berker.pek...@gmail.com:


--
nosy: +orsenthil
stage:  - patch review
title: [patch]: code removal from urllib.parse.urlsplit() - code removal from 
urllib.parse.urlsplit()
versions:  -Python 2.7, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4, Python 3.6

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22891
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue22891] code removal from urllib.parse.urlsplit()

2014-11-17 Thread Senthil Kumaran

Senthil Kumaran added the comment:

Thanks for filing this. Does test cases pass after removal of those lines? (I 
will be surprised) and if the tests fail, then after analyzing it, this could 
only be considered a new change (thus change to made in latest python) in order 
not to break compatibility.

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue22891
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com