[issue23512] The list of built-in functions is not alphabetical on https://docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html
Ezio Melotti added the comment: Fixed, thanks for the patch! -- resolution: - fixed stage: needs patch - resolved status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23512 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23512] The list of built-in functions is not alphabetical on https://docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html
Roundup Robot added the comment: New changeset 971d299d2cf3 by Ezio Melotti in branch '2.7': #23512: list non-essential built-in functions after the table. Patch by Carlo Beccarini. https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/971d299d2cf3 -- nosy: +python-dev ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23512 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23512] The list of built-in functions is not alphabetical on https://docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html
Changes by Carlo Beccarini hackdiablo...@gmail.com: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file38307/functions.rst ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23512 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23512] The list of built-in functions is not alphabetical on https://docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html
Changes by Ezio Melotti ezio.melo...@gmail.com: -- assignee: docs@python - ezio.melotti ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23512 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23512] The list of built-in functions is not alphabetical on https://docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html
Changes by Carlo Beccarini hackdiablo...@gmail.com: -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file38316/issue23512.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23512 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23512] The list of built-in functions is not alphabetical on https://docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html
Terry J. Reedy added the comment: It would be disconcerting if you went to this page looking for a builtin [and had trouble finding it] I agree with this premise. Since Idle, and I presume other IDEs, color code apply, coerce, intern, and buffer as builtins indistinguishably from all the others, these 4 should somehow be easy to find in or just below the rest. I have no particular opinion on the best way to do so. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23512 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23512] The list of built-in functions is not alphabetical on https://docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html
Changes by Carlo Beccarini hackdiablo...@gmail.com: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file38307/functions.rst ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23512 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23512] The list of built-in functions is not alphabetical on https://docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html
Edward D'Souza added the comment: I think putting them in a separate table is good, but I think it makes more sense to appear right below the existing table at the top of the page. For better or worse, these non-essential functions are still builtins in Python 2. It would be disconcerting if you went to this page looking for a builtin (eg. coerce) and couldn't find it at the top of the page with the other builtins. Above all, the list of builtins should be accurate as to what builtins actually exist in Python 2. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23512 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23512] The list of built-in functions is not alphabetical on https://docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html
Changes by Carlo Beccarini hackdiablo...@gmail.com: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file38305/functions.rst ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23512 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23512] The list of built-in functions is not alphabetical on https://docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html
Carlo Beccarini added the comment: diff -r 3019effc44f2 Doc/library/functions.rst --- a/Doc/library/functions.rst Mon Mar 02 11:17:05 2015 -0500 +++ b/Doc/library/functions.rst Mon Mar 02 21:13:27 2015 +0100 @@ -22,10 +22,10 @@ :func:`classmethod` :func:`getattr`:func:`map` |func-repr|_ :func:`xrange` :func:`cmp` :func:`globals`:func:`max` :func:`reversed` :func:`zip` :func:`compile` :func:`hasattr`|func-memoryview|_ :func:`round` :func:`__import__` -:func:`complex` :func:`hash` :func:`min` |func-set|_ :func:`apply` -:func:`delattr` :func:`help` :func:`next`:func:`setattr` :func:`buffer` -|func-dict|_ :func:`hex`:func:`object` :func:`slice` :func:`coerce` -:func:`dir` :func:`id` :func:`oct` :func:`sorted` :func:`intern` +:func:`complex` :func:`hash` :func:`min` |func-set|_ .. +:func:`delattr` :func:`help` :func:`next`:func:`setattr` .. +|func-dict|_ :func:`hex`:func:`object` :func:`slice` .. +:func:`dir` :func:`id` :func:`oct` :func:`sorted` .. === = == = .. using :func:`dict` would create a link to another page, so local targets are @@ -1699,6 +1699,11 @@ Python programmers, trainers, students and book writers should feel free to bypass these functions without concerns about missing something important. +=== = == = +.. Non-essentialBuilt-in Functions .. +=== = == = +:func:`apply`:func:`buffer` :func:`coerce` :func:`intern` +=== = == = .. function:: apply(function, args[, keywords]) -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file38304/functools.rst ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23512 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23512] The list of built-in functions is not alphabetical on https://docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html
Changes by SilentGhost ghost@gmail.com: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file38304/functools.rst ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23512 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23512] The list of built-in functions is not alphabetical on https://docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html
Changes by Carlo Beccarini hackdiablo...@gmail.com: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file38305/functions.rst ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23512 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23512] The list of built-in functions is not alphabetical on https://docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html
Éric Araujo added the comment: IIRC the table was added in a 3.x branch and backported to 2.7; the developer doing the backport added the functions missing in 3.x to the end of the table, thinking that re-ordering was not worth the trouble. -- nosy: +eric.araujo ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23512 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23512] The list of built-in functions is not alphabetical on https://docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html
Ezio Melotti added the comment: That was me in #10299 (the issue contains a discussion about the ordering in the last few messages). Since there are only 4 functions, I think it would be ok removing them from the table and instead add a sentence like In addition, there are other 4 built-in functions that are no longer considered essential: apply, buffer, coerce, and intern. They are documented in the Non-essential Built-in Functions section.. See also #16927 for a proposed grouping that might help solve this issue. -- nosy: +ezio.melotti ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23512 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23512] The list of built-in functions is not alphabetical on https://docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html
Georg Brandl added the comment: I agree with Edward. The table makes no distinction between the two group of builtins, so it is confusing why it would list them not in alphabetical order. I wouldn't go so far as to call it disrespectful though :) -- nosy: +georg.brandl ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23512 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue23512] The list of built-in functions is not alphabetical on https://docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html
Changes by R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com: -- title: The list of built-in http://text-processing.com/demo/sentiments is not alphabetical on https://docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html - The list of built-in functions is not alphabetical on https://docs.python.org/2/library/functions.html ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue23512 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
