[issue5261] with lock fails on multiprocessing

2009-03-30 Thread Jesse Noller

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment:

Reviewed, applied in python-trunk r70783

--
resolution:  - fixed
status: open - closed

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5261
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue5261] with lock fails on multiprocessing

2009-03-29 Thread Jesse Noller

Changes by Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com:


--
priority:  - high

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5261
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue5261] with lock fails on multiprocessing

2009-03-28 Thread Tim Golden

Tim Golden m...@timgolden.me.uk added the comment:

Can I nudge this one a bit? It causes an interpreter crash and the patch
seems good (subject to someone else's review).

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5261
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue5261] with lock fails on multiprocessing

2009-03-28 Thread Jesse Noller

Jesse Noller jnol...@gmail.com added the comment:

I will be addressing all of the MP bugs during the pycon sprints starting 
sunday

--

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5261
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue5261] with lock fails on multiprocessing

2009-02-15 Thread Tim Golden

Changes by Tim Golden m...@timgolden.me.uk:


--
type:  - crash

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5261
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue5261] with lock fails on multiprocessing

2009-02-14 Thread Stephen Lynch

New submission from Stephen Lynch stepheng.ly...@gmail.com:

the following code gives a system error under python 2.6.1

import multiprocessing

with multiprocessing.Lock(): pass


SystemError: ..\Python\getargs.c:1413: bad argument to internal function

--
components: Library (Lib)
messages: 82106
nosy: stepheng.lynch
severity: normal
status: open
title: with lock fails on multiprocessing
versions: Python 2.6

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5261
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue5261] with lock fails on multiprocessing

2009-02-14 Thread Benjamin Peterson

Changes by Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org:


--
assignee:  - jnoller
nosy: +jnoller

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5261
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com



[issue5261] with lock fails on multiprocessing

2009-02-14 Thread Tim Golden

Tim Golden m...@timgolden.me.uk added the comment:

Problem seems to be in Modules/_multiprocessing/semaphore.c 
line 549 where __enter__ is defined as an alias for 
semlock_acquire, as is acquire a few lines above. However,
while acquire specifies METH_VARARGS | METH_KEYWORDS,
__enter__ has only METH_VARARGS.

semlock_acquire at line 60 has the signature:

  SemLockObject *self, PyObject *args, PyObject *kwds

When it is called via __enter__ kwds aren't passed in
and it gets a NULL pointer.

Suggested patch attached, defining __enter__ in the same
way as acquire. Test included.

--
keywords: +patch
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file13090/multiprocessing.patch

___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue5261
___Index: Lib/test/test_multiprocessing.py
===
--- Lib/test/test_multiprocessing.py(revision 69621)
+++ Lib/test/test_multiprocessing.py(working copy)
@@ -547,6 +547,10 @@
 self.assertEqual(lock.release(), None)
 self.assertEqual(lock.release(), None)
 self.assertRaises((AssertionError, RuntimeError), lock.release)
+
+def test_lock_context(self):
+with self.Lock():
+pass
 
 
 class _TestSemaphore(BaseTestCase):
Index: Modules/_multiprocessing/semaphore.c
===
--- Modules/_multiprocessing/semaphore.c(revision 69621)
+++ Modules/_multiprocessing/semaphore.c(working copy)
@@ -546,7 +546,7 @@
 acquire the semaphore/lock},
{release, (PyCFunction)semlock_release, METH_NOARGS, 
 release the semaphore/lock},
-   {__enter__, (PyCFunction)semlock_acquire, METH_VARARGS,
+   {__enter__, (PyCFunction)semlock_acquire, METH_VARARGS | 
METH_KEYWORDS,
 enter the semaphore/lock},
{__exit__, (PyCFunction)semlock_release, METH_VARARGS, 
 exit the semaphore/lock},
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com