[issue9064] pdb enhancement up/down traversals
Georg Brandl ge...@python.org added the comment: Committed a slightly different patch in r82263. Thanks for the idea! -- nosy: +georg.brandl resolution: - accepted status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9064 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9064] pdb enhancement up/down traversals
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc amaur...@gmail.com added the comment: This is a good idea, but tab characters are disallowed in core python code; please replace them with spaces. Then, please provide an unified diff patch (with diff -u), and name it with the .patch extension, this will make it easier to read. -- nosy: +amaury.forgeotdarc ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9064 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9064] pdb enhancement up/down traversals
Andrew Valencia ajv-611-065-2...@vsta.org added the comment: Here's the patch, hopefully updated as requested. Thanks! -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17758/pdb_up.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9064 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9064] pdb enhancement up/down traversals
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc amaur...@gmail.com added the comment: Two remarks: - when int(arg) fails, an error message should be printed, like with the function do_commmands(). - the for loop seems unnecessary, something like self.curindex -= nup should be enough -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9064 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9064] pdb enhancement up/down traversals
Andrew Valencia ajv-611-065-2...@vsta.org added the comment: Debugging tools which have bugs are a real pain... thanks for your comments and attention. Here's another try. With all the loop baggage gone the argument handling really called for factoring out. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17759/pdb_up2.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9064 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9064] pdb enhancement up/down traversals
Andrew Valencia ajv-611-065-2...@vsta.org added the comment: My bad (new editor session lost the tab setting). Please consider this one with no tabs instead. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17760/pdb_up3.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9064 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9064] pdb enhancement up/down traversals
New submission from Andrew Valencia ajv-611-065-2...@vsta.org: In very deep stack traces (like runaway recursion) it can be a pain to get up to the top of the stack to see what kicked it off. I've enhanced up/down to take a numeric argument for the number of positions to traverse, or -1 to go to the top/bottom. Sample patch included. -- components: Demos and Tools files: pdb_up.pat messages: 108476 nosy: vandyswa priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: pdb enhancement up/down traversals type: feature request versions: Python 2.6 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file17754/pdb_up.pat ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9064 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
