[issue9858] RawIOBase doesn't define readinto
Changes by Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr: -- nosy: +benjamin.peterson, stutzbach ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9858 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9858] RawIOBase doesn't define readinto
Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org added the comment: +1 for a failing one. (Does the base implementation not raise?) Is it even possible to implement a real one without buffering? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9858 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9858] RawIOBase doesn't define readinto
Antoine Pitrou pit...@free.fr added the comment: +1 for a failing one. (Does the base implementation not raise?) The base implementation doesn't exist :) Is it even possible to implement a real one without buffering? FileIO does. It's the same as read(), except that you read into an existing buffer rather than allocating a new bytes object. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9858 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
