[issue10503] os.getuid() documentation should be clear on what kind of uid it is referring
New submission from Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: http://docs.python.org/library/os.html#os.getuid os.getuid() documentation just states: Return the current process’s user id. It is not clear, however, whether user id refers to real, effective or saved user id. As per: http://linux.about.com/library/cmd/blcmdl2_getuid.htm ...it should refer to _real_ user id. -- assignee: d...@python components: Documentation messages: 122117 nosy: d...@python, giampaolo.rodola priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: os.getuid() documentation should be clear on what kind of uid it is referring versions: Python 2.6, Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10503 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10503] os.getuid() documentation should be clear on what kind of uid it is referring
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Update: I think also os.getlogin() doc is wrong. This is what it states (2.7 doc): Return the name of the user logged in on the controlling terminal of the process. For most purposes, it is more useful to use the environment variable LOGNAME to find out who the user is, or pwd.getpwuid(os.getuid())[0] to get the login name of the currently effective user id. Since os.getuid() refers to _real_ uid the last sentence should be changed as such: - ... to get the login name of the currently effective user id. + ... to get the login name of the currently real user id. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10503 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10503] os.getuid() documentation should be clear on what kind of uid it is referring
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Indeed, now that I google for getlogin, it's not easy to figure out what kind of user it is supposed to return exactly. For getuid() it seems pretty clear that we're talking about _real_ uid, though. http://www.manpagez.com/man/2/getuid/ http://linux.die.net/man/2/getuid -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10503 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1745035] DoS smtpd vulnerability
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: I think data_size_limit and command_size_limit should be class attributes instead of instance attributes. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1745035 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1745035] DoS smtpd vulnerability
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: AFAICT patch looks ok to me. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1745035 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10516] Add list.clear() and list.copy()
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10516 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2001] Pydoc interactive browsing enhancement
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: -- nosy: -giampaolo.rodola ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue2001 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9129] DoS smtpd module vulnerability
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Fixed for Python 2.6 in r87123. Closing out as fixed. -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9129 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10711] Rip out HTTP 0.9 support
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10711 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10784] os.getpriority() and os.setpriority()
New submission from Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: After having implemented a similar thing in psutil ( http://code.google.com/p/psutil/issues/detail?id=142 ) I decided to contribute a patch for Python which exposes getpriority() and setpriority() POSIX calls in the os module. They can be used to get/set process niceness/priority in a fashion similar to os.nice() but extended to *all* processes instead of just os.getpid(): http://linux.die.net/man/2/setpriority -- assignee: giampaolo.rodola keywords: patch messages: 124751 nosy: giampaolo.rodola, loewis, pitrou priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: os.getpriority() and os.setpriority() versions: Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10784 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10784] os.getpriority() and os.setpriority()
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Forgot to attach the patch. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20177/getsetpriority.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10784 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10784] os.getpriority() and os.setpriority()
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +christian.heimes ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10784 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue5672] Implement a way to change the python process name
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: If somebody would provide a patch that adds prctl to the posix module, that would be fine with me - we have a long tradition of exposing all available system calls if somebody wants them. Just for the record, I was about to try to do this, when I realized that exposing prctl requires expecting a variable number of arguments with variable types. It turns out providing a Python wrapper for such a kind of C API is just a pain. There's an implementation though, handling 2 args only (instead of 5): https://github.com/seveas/python-prctl/blob/master/_prctlmodule.c#L9 Considering that this also Linux-only, I don't think it really worths the effort. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue5672 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue4953] cgi module cannot handle POST with multipart/form-data in 3.0
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: -- nosy: -giampaolo.rodola ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue4953 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1559549] ImportError needs attributes for module and file name
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1559549 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10878] asyncore does not react properly on close()
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Problem is you have to return False right after close(). There's an open issue to add a scheduler to asyncore: http://bugs.python.org/issue1641 Closing this out as invalid. -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola resolution: - invalid status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10878 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10784] os.getpriority() and os.setpriority()
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Question: should Py_BEGIN/END_ALLOW_THREADS be used around getpriority() and setpriority() calls? It's still not clear to me when to use them exactly. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10784 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10878] asyncore does not react properly on close()
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: What if you return False also in writable method? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10878 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10882] Add os.sendfile()
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Thanks for writing this. Follows my comments. I would focus on trying to provide a unique interface across all platforms. Being sendfile() not a standard POSIX I think we should not worry about providing a strict one-to-one interface. headers and trailers arguments should be available everywhere as they are crucial in different protocols such as HTTP. On Linux this is possible by using the TCP_CORK option. man sendfile on Linux provides some information. Also you might find useful to see how medusa did this (/medusa-20010416/sendfile/sendfilemodule.c): http://www.nightmare.com/medusa/ The offset parameter should be available everywhere, Linux included (in your patch you dropped Linux support). Also, I think it should be optional since when it's NULL, sendfile() implicitly assumes the current offset (file's tell() return value). This is true on Linux, at least. Not sure about other platforms but my best guess is that it should not be mandatory. It turns out the only peculiar argument is flags, available only on *BSD. I'm not sure what's best to do here. Maybe it makes sense to provide it across all platforms, defaulting to 0 and raise ValueError when specified on systems != *BSD. In summary, the function might look like this: sendfile(out, in, count, offset=None, headers=None, trailers=None, flags=0) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10882 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10882] Add os.sendfile()
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Also, I think it should be optional since when it's NULL, sendfile() implicitly assumes the current offset (file's tell() return value). This is true on Linux, at least. Not sure about other platforms but my best guess is that it should not be mandatory. I'm not so sure about this anymore. Please ignore this. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10882 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10882] Add os.sendfile()
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: I agree then, although I'm not sure there are other functions in the os module (or anywhere else) having a variable number of args depending on the platform. I wanted to try your patch but it does not apply cleanly (python 3.2, revision 87930). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10882 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10882] Add os.sendfile()
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: I agree then, although I'm not sure having a function with a variable number of args depending on the platform is acceptable. I wanted to try your patch but it does not apply cleanly (python 3.2, revision 87930). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10882 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10882] Add os.sendfile()
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: -- Removed message: http://bugs.python.org/msg126007 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10882 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue4112] Subprocess: Popen'ed children hang due to open pipes
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue4112 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10882] Add os.sendfile()
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: The patch as-is did not work on Linux. I had to add entries in pyconfig.h.in and configure files in order to make os.sendfile available. Patch is in attachment. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20357/sendfile_v2.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10882 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue2292] Missing *-unpacking generalizations
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue2292 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1615158] POSIX capabilities support
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola versions: +Python 3.3 -Python 3.2 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1615158 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9344] please add posix.getgrouplist()
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9344 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue4761] create Python wrappers for openat() and others
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue4761 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10982] asyncore timeouts do not work correctly
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: You have misinterpreted the purpose of timeout argument. timeout argument tells select() or poll() how long they have to wait before returning in case no file descriptors are ready. This has nothing to do with asyncore.loop() which is supposed to keep running except when: - all file descriptors have been closed/extinguished - the count argument is provided ...in which case it finally returns. Closing out as invalid. -- resolution: - invalid status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10982 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10968] threading.Timer should be a class so that it can be derived
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10968 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10852] SSL/TLS sni use in smtp, pop, imap, nntp, ftp client libs by default
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10852 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10963] subprocess can raise OSError (EPIPE) when communicating with short-lived processes
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10963 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10882] Add os.sendfile()
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment:
Please note that on FreeBSD things work a little bit differently for
non-blocking sockets:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=sendfilesektion=2
In details I'm talking about:
When using a socket marked for non-blocking I/O, sendfile() may send
fewer bytes than requested. In this case, the number of bytes
success-fully written is returned in *sbytes (if specified), and the
error EAGAIN is returned.
...and the similar note about EBUSY, later in the page.
Something like this should work:
ret = sendfile(in, out, offset, sbytes, sf, flags);
...
if (ret == -1) {
if ((errno == EAGAIN) || (errno == EBUSY)) {
return Py_BuildValue(ll, sbytes, offset + sbytes);
}
return posix_error();
}
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10882
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue5097] asyncore.dispatcher_with_send undocumented
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: I documented this some months ago: http://docs.python.org/library/asyncore.html#asyncore.dispatcher_with_send Being asynchat's push() method more convenient for such kind of task I expressively avoided to be too specific about dispatcher_with_send. -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed versions: -Python 2.6, Python 3.1 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue5097 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue1191964] asynchronous Subprocess
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: -- versions: +Python 3.3 -Python 3.2 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue1191964 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10882] Add os.sendfile()
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Could you please also add support for offset argument on Linux? Also, headers, trailers and flags could be turned in keyword args for simplicity. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10882 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue3561] Windows installer should add Python and Scripts directories to the PATH environment variable
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue3561 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10882] Add os.sendfile()
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Copy *count* bytes from file descriptor *in* to file descriptor *out*, starting at *offset* and continuing for *count* bytes. The latter part is incorrect as it is not guaranteed that all bytes specified in count argument are going to be sent and it also sounds like the function is blocking. I'd change that in just Copy *count* bytes from file descriptor *in* to file descriptor *out*. Also, I'd be for using the BSD notation and rename the count argument to nbytes, which is more clear. Docstring should be changed to reflect the keyword arguments: - sendfile(out, in, offset, count, headers, trailers, flags)\n\ + sendfile(out, in, offset, count[, headers[, trailers], flags]]])\n\ Finally, tests for header and trailer arguments should be written. The rest of the patch looks ok to me. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10882 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10882] Add os.sendfile()
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: I'm pretty sure that Solaris isn't the only platform that supports non- socket file descriptors here, Linux (the platform I'm using), is one such case. No, sendfile() on Linux supports only socket file descriptors: http://linux.die.net/man/2/sendfile -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10882 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11049] add tests for test.support
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Attached is a patch which tests about half the API. Certain functions are not documented and/or it's not clear what they do, for others it seems unlikely they are actually used nowadays (although I haven't checked). Also, it probably makes sense to get rid of some functions which look very old or completely useless. -- keywords: +patch nosy: +giampaolo.rodola Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20596/test_support.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11049 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11015] Bring test.support docs up to date
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11015 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11049] add tests for test.support
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: * class TestCase(unittest.TestCase): - why not give the test class a more useful name? done * import_fresh_module is tested similarly to import_module - can't a test be added that it indeed performs its special sauce? Even by reading the source code I'm not sure what import_fresh_module does exactly. Feel free to write a test for it if you want. * test_DirsOnSysPath: you may want to use assertIn and assertNotIn here. [these were added to Python in 3.1] done * test_python_is_optimized: you may want to use assertIsInstance here. done +os.mkdir(os.path.join(TESTFN, TESTFN)) Please don't. This will break the day TESTFN becomes a non-trivial path. done You should also check that the errno is EBADF. Done. I just hope it's gonna be reliable on all platforms. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20602/test_support.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11049 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11051] system calls per import
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11051 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11072] Add MLSD command support to ftplib
New submission from Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com:
From RFC-3659:
The MLST and MLSD commands are intended to standardize the file and
directory information returned by the server-FTP process. These
commands differ from the LIST command in that the format of the
replies is strictly defined although extensible.
The patch in attachment adds support for MLSD command.
This should ease the development of ftp clients which are forced to parse
un-standardized LIST responses via dir() or retrlines() methods to obtain
meaningful data for the directory listing.
Example:
import ftplib
from pprint import pprint as pp
f = ftplib.FTP()
f.connect(localhost)
f.login(anonymous)
ls = f.mlsd()
pp(ls)
{'modify': 20100814164724,
'name': 'svnmerge.py',
'perm': 'r',
'size': 90850,
'type': 'file',
'unique': '80718b568'},
{'modify': 20101207185033,
'name': 'README',
'perm': 'r',
'size': 53731,
'type': 'file',
'unique': '80718aafe'},
{'modify': 20100417183215,
'name': 'install-sh',
'perm': 'r',
'size': 7122,
'type': 'file',
'unique': '80718b2d2'},
{'modify': 20110129210053,
'name': 'Include',
'perm': 'el',
'size': 4096,
'type': 'dir',
'unique': '8071a2bc4'}]
--
files: ftplib_mlsd.patch
keywords: patch
messages: 127562
nosy: giampaolo.rodola, pitrou
priority: normal
severity: normal
status: open
title: Add MLSD command support to ftplib
versions: Python 3.3
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20623/ftplib_mlsd.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11072
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10882] Add os.sendfile()
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: In case someone is interested in statistics, I wrote a sendfile() wrapper by using ctypes for pyftpdlib and benchmark results are quite impressive: http://code.google.com/p/pyftpdlib/issues/detail?id=152#c5 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10882 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11117] Implementing Async IO
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue7 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11127] sockets should not be pickleable
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11127 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11109] socketserver.ForkingMixIn leaves zombies
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11109 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10882] Add os.sendfile()
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment:
Patch in attachment provides a complete test suite.
It also fixes a problem which occurred on BSD platforms when using non-blocking
sockets: EAGAIN/EBUSY are now raised if the transmitted data == 0 bytes
reflecting socket's send() behavior:
+if (ret 0) {
+if ((errno == EAGAIN) || (errno == EBUSY)) {
+if (sbytes != 0) {
+// some data has been sent
+goto done;
+}
+else {
+// no data has been sent; upper application is supposed
+// to retry on EAGAIN or EBUSY
+return posix_error();
+}
+}
+return posix_error();
+}
+goto done;
The test suite shows that trailer argument does not work.
I couldn't manage to figure out what's wrong though.
--
Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20688/sendfile_v6.patch
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue10882
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10882] Add os.sendfile()
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: You're right, that line is certainly wrong as it should compare for bytes but the trailer data still doesn't get appended. Do you have a BSD box in order to figure out what's wrong? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10882 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10882] Add os.sendfile()
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: I was testing against FreeBSD 7.0 RC1 and I confirm the problem doesn't occur on 8.1 version. Patch in attachment adds test for flags argument and skips headers/trailers tests on linux and solaris. I'm ok for committing this as-is in 3.3. -- resolution: - accepted status: open - pending Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20708/sendfile_v7.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10882 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10882] Add os.sendfile()
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: On a second thought I have two complaints. There is no reason to return the file offset, also because this is only supported on Linux. On all other platforms we are calculating the file offset by making a sum of offset + number of bytes sent. Despite this would normally work it no longer makes sense when headers/trailers arguments are specified. sendfile(in, out, offset, 4096, headers=[b]) (5000, 5000) In this case the right offset is supposed to be 4096. We might adjust this in the code but in my opinion knowing the file offset is not really necessary as what the user really needs is the number of bytes sent, as when using socket.send(). My second complaint is about headers/trailers data type. Currently we are passing a sequence of buffers (tipically a list) but I think we should pass plain bytes instead. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10882 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10882] Add os.sendfile()
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Patch in attachment removes offset and return just the number of bytes sent as an integer. Tests and documentation are updated accordingly. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20733/sendfile_v8.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10882 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11177] Set asyncore create_socket default argument
New submission from Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: At the current state asyncore implicitly supports TCP (SOCK_STREAM) sockets only, despite UDP support might be added in the future. For simplicity, create_socket() should assume TCP/IP by default. This would avoid the user to import socket and specify the two constants every time, which is annoying. -- files: asyncore_create_socket.patch keywords: patch messages: 128327 nosy: giampaolo.rodola priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Set asyncore create_socket default argument versions: Python 3.3 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20735/asyncore_create_socket.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11177 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11177] Set asyncore create_socket default argument
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: -- assignee: - giampaolo.rodola ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11177 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11181] TLS end connection not detected properly in retrbinary
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Please provide more information. Have you actually seen this happen? retrlines method isn't currently looking for EOF. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11181 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10084] SSL support for asyncore
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Initial draft of a patch including tests and a new ssl_dispatcher subclass. asynchat needs to be changed as well, probably by using a mixin class. -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20752/asyncore_ssl_v1.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10084 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11214] test_asyncore fails on AIX
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: I'd say the test can be removed. It's not really important. -- assignee: - giampaolo.rodola ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11214 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11227] [DOC] asyncore - use 'Host' header in HTTP example
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Patch looks fine to me. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11227 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11232] asyncore - don't throw a traceback when a client disconnects in echo server example
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: +1 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11232 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11257] asyncore stores unnecessary object references
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Such code should be rewritten via weakref. Can you write a patch? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11257 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11259] asynchat does not check if terminator is negative integer
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: What do you mean by constructions like self.ac_in_buffer[:n] will lead to misbehaviour.? Please try to be more precise (e.g. by providing a piece of code which demonstrates the issue). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11259 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11274] asyncore does not support epoll
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: This is not easy to do. See: http://bugs.python.org/issue6692 Closing out as duplicate. -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola resolution: - duplicate status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11274 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11273] asyncore creates selec (or poll) on every iteration
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11273 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11257] asyncore stores unnecessary object references
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: I'd be fine with this. My only concern are performances. I've tried this: http://code.google.com/p/pyftpdlib/issues/attachmentText?id=152aid=-7106494857544071944name=bench.pytoken=bd350bbd6909c7c2a70da55db15d24ed Results: plain dict: 722.26 Mb/sec WeakValueDictionary: 659.76 Mb/sec -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11257 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11281] smtplib: add ability to bind to specific source IP address/port
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: +1, this has been done for other modules such as ftplib as well and probably could be done for others such as httplib and poplib. -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11281 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11281] smtplib: add ability to bind to specific source IP address/port
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: I would like to add source_ip and source_port parameters to smtplib.SMTP, default to '' and 0 respectively. It would be better to provide a unique source_address parameter defaulting to None, for consistency with socket.create_connection() expecting a (addr, port) tuple. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11281 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11289] smtplib context manager
New submission from Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: Patch in attachment provides a context manager for SMTP class so that it can be used with the with statement. -- messages: 129096 nosy: giampaolo.rodola, pitrou priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: smtplib context manager versions: Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11289 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11281] smtplib: add ability to bind to specific source IP address/port
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Seems like the signature of Lib.test.mock_socket.create_connection does not match socket.create_connection since 2.7. You can add a fake parameter which does nothing. What is the notation for the new keyword arguments? fun(a, b, c=None, d=None) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11281 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11289] smtplib context manager
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Ouch! Here. =) -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20845/smtplib_context_manager.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11289 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11289] smtplib context manager
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: is print really necessary in the test? no, my mistake -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11289 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11281] smtplib: add ability to bind to specific source IP address/port
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Yes, you must update Doc/library/smtplib.rst and write tests. If you're not the one who's gonna commit the patch you can ignore Doc/whatsnew/3.3.srt and Misc/NEWS changes. Updating the docstring is usually optional but I see smtplib module is already well documented so I'd update docstrings as well. As for how to write a patch see: http://www.python.org/dev/faq/#patches ...or search in the bug tracker for committed patches, such as: http://bugs.python.org/issue8807 http://svn.python.org/view?view=revisionrevision=84144 -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11281 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11287] Add context manager support to dbm modules
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11287 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11281] smtplib: add ability to bind to specific source IP address/port
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: We already have 3 places where a tuple is used: socket.socket.bind socket.create_connection http.client.HTTPConnection Changing this notation in smtplib for such a rarely used feature is not worth the effort, imo. Also, I would not add two new SMTP attributes. Passing a tuple to socket.create_connection() is just fine. If you want to know the source address afterwards you can use socket.getsockname(). PS - I modified smtplib.py in meantime. Please update your local copy. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11281 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11291] poplib suppresses exception on QUIT
New submission from Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: Unlike ftplib, smtplib and probably others, poplib suppresses error_proto exceptions on quit(). I'm not sure in what circumstances a POP3 server can return a negative response on QUIT but if this happens poplib should raise an exception. Users who don't care about QUIT response can use the new close() method. For backward compatibility patch should only be applied to Python 3.3 . -- files: poplib_quit.patch keywords: patch messages: 129114 nosy: giampaolo.rodola, pitrou priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: poplib suppresses exception on QUIT versions: Python 3.3 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20846/poplib_quit.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11291 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11049] add tests for test.support
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Can we commit this patch? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11049 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11281] smtplib: add ability to bind to specific source IP address/port
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment:
Follow my comments:
+ source_address=('', 0)):
Make that default to None instead and pass it as-is to
socket.create_connection().
+self.source_address = source_address
There's no need to store the source address as an instance attribute.
Just pass it as-is to socket.create_connection() in __init__ and connect
methods and then get rid of it.
I think source_address no longer makes sense in UNIX sockets / LMTP class.
Or at least, this is what I get if I try to bind() a UNIX socket:
import socket
sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_UNIX, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
sock.bind((, 0))
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
File string, line 1, in bind
TypeError: argument must be string or read-only character buffer, not tuple
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue11281
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10882] Add os.sendfile()
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: I'm going to commit the patch and then watch whether some of the buildbots turn red. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10882 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10882] Add os.sendfile()
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Committed in r88580. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10882 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11232] asyncore - don't throw a traceback when a client disconnects in echo server example
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Fixed. -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11232 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11259] asynchat does not check if terminator is negative integer
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Can you provide a patch including a test case? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11259 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11314] Subprocess suffers 40% process creation overhead penalty
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11314 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10882] Add os.sendfile()
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Thanks Georg. It seems we have a failure on Leopard: http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/all/builders/PPC%20Leopard%203.x/builds/1411/steps/test/logs/stdio Also, I think I can add support for AIX if someone gives me SSH access over an AIX box. I'm maintaining a separate project to port sendfile() on python 2: http://code.google.com/p/py-sendfile/ -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10882 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11232] asyncore - don't throw a traceback when a client disconnects in echo server example
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Sorry: fixed in r88581. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11232 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11323] os.sendfile() bo failure on solaris
New submission from Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: http://www.python.org/dev/buildbot/all/builders/sparc%20solaris10%20gcc%203.x/builds/2658/steps/test/logs/stdio Patch in attachment. -- files: sendfile-test.patch keywords: patch messages: 129411 nosy: giampaolo.rodola, loewis priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: os.sendfile() bo failure on solaris versions: Python 3.3 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20892/sendfile-test.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11323 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11214] test_asyncore fails on AIX
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Fixed in r88604, r88605, r88606 -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.3 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11214 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9795] nntplib.NNTP should support the context protocol
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Patch in attachment. -- keywords: +patch versions: +Python 3.3 -Python 3.2 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file20894/nntplib-context-manager.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9795 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10784] os.getpriority() and os.setpriority()
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Committed in r88608 including Py_RETURN_NONE and Py_BEGIN/END_ALLOW_THREADS changes. -- resolution: - fixed status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10784 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue10784] os.getpriority() and os.setpriority()
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Misc/NEWS updated in r88609. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue10784 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11323] os.sendfile() bo failure on solaris
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Committed in r88616. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11323 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11177] Set asyncore create_socket default argument
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Fixed in r88619. -- nosy: +josiah.carlson resolution: - fixed status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11177 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11291] poplib suppresses exception on QUIT
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Fixed in r88620. -- components: +Library (Lib) resolution: - fixed status: open - closed ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11291 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11281] smtplib: add ability to bind to specific source IP address/port
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: You are right, I haven't thought about that. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11281 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9795] nntplib.NNTP should support the context protocol
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: (socket.error, EOFError) after quit() indicates that the socket is disconnected, in which case we should not raise any error (or at least, this is the approach we're using in ftplib) while all other NNTPError related errors are not suppressed. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9795 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11323] os.sendfile() bo failure on solaris
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +rosslagerwall ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11323 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11325] compilation warning with sendfile
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Thanks. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11325 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11257] asyncore stores unnecessary object references
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: Unless there's a way to automatically call close() when a dispatcher instance is no longer referenced (and I can't think of anything to do that) I'd say we better close this as rejected. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11257 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue4761] create Python wrappers for openat() and others
Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com added the comment: What about Doc/whatsnew/3.3.rst? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue4761 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue11333] Add empty __slots__ to collections.abc abstract base classes
Changes by Giampaolo Rodola' g.rod...@gmail.com: -- nosy: +giampaolo.rodola ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue11333 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
