Re: [python-committers] Save the date: Core developer sprints

2018-03-08 Thread Carol Willing
Thanks Steve. Happy to pitch in with organizing if it would be helpful (and it 
can be done remotely).

Carol

> On Mar 8, 2018, at 2:21 PM, Mariatta Wijaya  > wrote:
> 
> Thanks for organizing!
> 
> I should be able to attend for the whole week this time :) Looking forward to 
> it.
> 
> Mariatta Wijaya
> 
> ᐧ
> ___
> python-committers mailing list
> python-committers@python.org 
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
> Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/


Re: [python-committers] Save the date: Core developer sprints

2018-03-08 Thread Mariatta Wijaya
Thanks for organizing!

I should be able to attend for the whole week this time :) Looking forward
to it.

Mariatta Wijaya

ᐧ
___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/


[python-committers] Reminder: 3.6.5rc1 cutoff coming up

2018-03-08 Thread Ned Deily
A quick reminder that it's time for our next quarterly maintenance release of 
Python 3.6.  The cutoff for 3.6.5rc1 is planned for 2018-03-12 end-of-the-day 
AOE.  Please get any bug fixes and doc changes in before then.  Expect that any 
changes merged after the 3.6.5rc1 cutoff will be released in 3.6.6 which is 
currently scheduled for 2018-06 (along with 3.7.0).

Also, a reminder that 3.6.x has been out in the field for nearly 15 months now 
and thanks to all of your hard work in previous feature releases and during the 
3.6 development phase, the 3.6 release series has seen remarkably quick 
adoption to overall great acclaim.  Now that 3.6 has reached a certain level of 
maturity, it is important for all of us to continue to focus on stability for 
all of its downstream users.  A key assumption of our maintenance strategy for 
years has been that we as a project will only maintain the most recent bugfix 
(or security) release.  In other words, when we release x.y.z, we immediately 
drop support for x.y.z-1.  To do that, we implicitly promise to users that they 
can "painlessly" upgrade from any x.y.n to x.y.z where n < z.  To try to keep 
that promise, we strive to make no incompatible changes in x.y.z without 
*really* good reasons.  I think it is important as 3.6 moves along in its 
lifecycle to put ourselves in the shoes of our users and ask ourselve
 s if a change is really appropriate at this stage.  There's no hard and fast 
rule here, just continue to use your best judgement.  When in doubt, ask!

FYI, I've adjusted the 3.6.x release schedule to allow for 2 additional 
quarterly maintenance releases after 3.7.0 releases instead of just one.  That 
means the final bugfix release for the 3.6 series is planned to be 3.6.8 in 
2018-12, 6 months after 3.7.0 releases and 2 years after 3.6.0 first released.  
Thereafter, only security issues will be accepted and addressed for the 
remaining life of 3.6.

Thanks again!
--Ned

https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0494/

--
  Ned Deily
  n...@python.org -- []

___
python-committers mailing list
python-committers@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Code of Conduct: https://www.python.org/psf/codeofconduct/