Re: [python-committers] [PSF-Members] [Fwd: Re: Push rights for Ross Lagerwall]
Am 10.03.11 00:45, schrieb Steve Holden: On Mar 9, 2011, at 10:28 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: We don't need an explanation, we need a *solution*. Please speak for yourself only. Is it just you being upset to have to use paper, or is Ross Lagerwall actively refusing to put his signature on a piece of paper? Because Antoine is not entitled to include you in his "we" does not entitle you to put him in the singular. I doubt he is the only member who finds it difficult to understand why we are still using paper. I'd still like to understand whether this issue actually blocks the case at hand. Antoine originally wrote > I've told Ross it would be nice to send one if he hadn't > already done so, but I have obviously no way of checking whether > he did or not. So the next logical step would be to ask him. If Ross said that he did send the form, that would be good enough for me to proceed. That would also be a *solution*. Regards, Martin ___ python-committers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
[python-committers] Contirbutor Agreements
We received a contributor agreement from Boris Feld, Belfort, France by postal mail. I will send it by postal mail to our Administrator. I have not seen an agreement from Ross. If he sent one, I'd suggest he re-send it by attaching a scan to an email, given that it appears time is pressing. The Feld agreement took several weeks to wend its way to me. KBK On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 05:46 -0500, " Martin v. Löwis " wrote: > Am 10.03.11 00:45, schrieb Steve Holden: > > > > On Mar 9, 2011, at 10:28 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: > > > >>> We don't need an explanation, we need a *solution*. > >> > >> Please speak for yourself only. Is it just you being upset to have > >> to use paper, or is Ross Lagerwall actively refusing to put his > >> signature on a piece of paper? > >> > > Because Antoine is not entitled to include you in his "we" does not > > entitle you to put him in the singular. I doubt he is the only member > > who finds it difficult to understand why we are still using paper. > > I'd still like to understand whether this issue actually blocks the > case at hand. Antoine originally wrote > > > I've told Ross it would be nice to send one if he hadn't > > already done so, but I have obviously no way of checking whether > > he did or not. > > So the next logical step would be to ask him. If Ross said that > he did send the form, that would be good enough for me to proceed. > That would also be a *solution*. > > Regards, > Martin > ___ > python-committers mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers > ___ python-committers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Re: [python-committers] [PSF-Members] [Fwd: Re: Push rights for Ross Lagerwall]
> > I've told Ross it would be nice to send one if he hadn't > > already done so, but I have obviously no way of checking whether > > he did or not. > > So the next logical step would be to ask him. If Ross said that > he did send the form, that would be good enough for me to proceed. > That would also be a *solution*. Martin, why don't you implement your solution yourself, if you think the process is not a problem? That would be a good way of putting money where your mouth is. I'm obviously not going to do that work for you. I'm not paid by the PSF to solve paperwork. ___ python-committers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Re: [python-committers] [PSF-Members] [Fwd: Re: Push rights for Ross Lagerwall]
So the next logical step would be to ask him. If Ross said that he did send the form, that would be good enough for me to proceed. That would also be a *solution*. Martin, why don't you implement your solution yourself, if you think the process is not a problem? That would be a good way of putting money where your mouth is. I'm obviously not going to do that work for you. I'm not paid by the PSF to solve paperwork. Just for the record: neither am I. However, sending an email to Ross wasn't that difficult. Regards, Martin ___ python-committers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Re: [python-committers] [PSF-Members] [Fwd: Re: Push rights for Ross Lagerwall]
Le jeudi 10 mars 2011 à 11:25 -0500, "Martin v. Löwis" a écrit : > >> So the next logical step would be to ask him. If Ross said that > >> he did send the form, that would be good enough for me to proceed. > >> That would also be a *solution*. > > > > Martin, why don't you implement your solution yourself, if you think the > > process is not a problem? That would be a good way of putting money > > where your mouth is. > > > > I'm obviously not going to do that work for you. I'm not paid by the PSF > > to solve paperwork. > > Just for the record: neither am I. However, sending an email to Ross > wasn't that difficult. Right, sending a mail isn't difficult. Do you volunteer to do the necessary work (sending emails, following up on them, etc.) each and every time the need for requesting and checking contributor agreements arises? Thank you Antoine. ___ python-committers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Re: [python-committers] [PSF-Members] [Fwd: Re: Push rights for Ross Lagerwall]
On Mar 10, 2011, at 11:43 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > Le jeudi 10 mars 2011 à 11:25 -0500, "Martin v. Löwis" a écrit : So the next logical step would be to ask him. If Ross said that he did send the form, that would be good enough for me to proceed. That would also be a *solution*. >>> >>> Martin, why don't you implement your solution yourself, if you think the >>> process is not a problem? That would be a good way of putting money >>> where your mouth is. >>> >>> I'm obviously not going to do that work for you. I'm not paid by the PSF >>> to solve paperwork. >> >> Just for the record: neither am I. However, sending an email to Ross >> wasn't that difficult. > > Right, sending a mail isn't difficult. Do you volunteer to do the > necessary work (sending emails, following up on them, etc.) each and > every time the need for requesting and checking contributor agreements > arises? > > Thank you Antoine: Your point will be more effectively made without this continual sniping at anyone who responds to you. That wasn't intended as a serious question, was it? UYou know Martin won't have time to do that. As a matter of fact, though, the PSF has an administrator who is perfectly capable of doing just this if it's the best process we have, she just hasn't been involved in processing new developers in the past. So Pat should probably get involved in defining what the process is. Let's work towards a solution, please. regards Steve ___ python-committers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Re: [python-committers] [PSF-Members] [Fwd: Re: Push rights for Ross Lagerwall]
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Steve Holden wrote: > On Mar 10, 2011, at 11:43 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > >> Le jeudi 10 mars 2011 à 11:25 -0500, "Martin v. Löwis" a écrit : > So the next logical step would be to ask him. If Ross said that > he did send the form, that would be good enough for me to proceed. > That would also be a *solution*. Martin, why don't you implement your solution yourself, if you think the process is not a problem? That would be a good way of putting money where your mouth is. I'm obviously not going to do that work for you. I'm not paid by the PSF to solve paperwork. >>> >>> Just for the record: neither am I. However, sending an email to Ross >>> wasn't that difficult. >> >> Right, sending a mail isn't difficult. Do you volunteer to do the >> necessary work (sending emails, following up on them, etc.) each and >> every time the need for requesting and checking contributor agreements >> arises? >> >> Thank you > > Antoine: > > Your point will be more effectively made without this continual sniping at > anyone who responds to you. That wasn't intended as a serious question, was > it? UYou know Martin won't have time to do that. > > As a matter of fact, though, the PSF has an administrator who is perfectly > capable of doing just this if it's the best process we have, she just hasn't > been involved in processing new developers in the past. So Pat should > probably get involved in defining what the process is. > > Let's work towards a solution, please. > > regards > Steve I have spoken to Van Lindberg, and he and I will be driving/discussing the best approach for electronic CLAs/signing. We will drive this on a PSF level. ___ python-committers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
Re: [python-committers] [PSF-Members] [Fwd: Re: Push rights for Ross Lagerwall]
Le jeudi 10 mars 2011 à 12:00 -0500, Jesse Noller a écrit : > I have spoken to Van Lindberg, and he and I will be driving/discussing > the best approach for electronic CLAs/signing. We will drive this on a > PSF level. Thank you! ___ python-committers mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-committers
