Re: please set up a mod_python core group

2006-01-22 Thread Greg Stein
On Thu, Jan 19, 2006 at 03:04:43PM -0500, Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 19 Jan 2006, Jorey Bump wrote:
> 
> >+1 here, but since the build process and typical MPM differs among 
> >platforms, could we see a list that this group represents?
> 
> This group would not represent any platforms when acting in _this_ 
> capacity. One of the group's responsibility would be to decide whether 
> sufficient number of platforms were represented by tests done by anyone on 
> this mailing list (including anyone from this group, of course).

Right. The +1 votes for a release simply represents the view, "is this
codebase ready for a release?" Whatever measures may apply is
completely irrelevant. If those with binding votes want to say +1 just
because it is Tuesday, then fine. But they're responsible for the
outcome, so I'm sure they'll want to take a little more caution.

What we're talking about is "who sets the direction? who has the final
say? who defines what mod_python is really about?"

Cheers,
-g

-- 
Greg Stein, http://www.lyra.org/


Re: please set up a mod_python core group

2006-01-22 Thread Greg Stein
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 08:01:07PM -0500, Jorey Bump wrote:
>...
> >So, please, take a few moments to decide amongst yourselves who
> >should have binding votes on mod_python (i.e., who has earned it),
>...
> I vote that Grisha gets all three votes. Benevolent dictatorship is the 
> Python way, after all.

But that isn't how Apache works. Therefore, it is a non-starter.

Cheers,
-g

-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ... ASF Chairman ... http://www.apache.org/