Re: release 3.2.10?

2006-07-18 Thread Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy


I'm +1 on going for 3.2.10.

You in Canada probably have it easier - I think we hit 96F/35C at some
point today or yesterday (I wouldn't know I'm in the office which has AC 
sunrise to sunset, I just listen to the news), and unfortunately (or not) 
due to work pressures I have no time for anything - no frolicking for me 
this summer :-(


Grisha

On Sun, 16 Jul 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote:


Graham Dumpleton wrote:

Jim Gallacher wrote ..

Shall we proceed with a 3.2.10 release with the current memory leak
fixes, or keep digging for more leaks?

Seeing as it's summer for most of us (except for Graham), I get the
feeling people don't have a lot of free time to spend on mod_python
right now.


Just because it is winter down here and I'm freezing my butt off doesn't
mean I am any less busy. :-(


Oh, I wasn't suggesting you were any less busy - just that folks in the
northern hemisphere may well choose to frolic in the summer sun rather
that hack away at mod_python in their spare time. :)

Jim



Re: release 3.2.10?

2006-07-18 Thread Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy


On Tue, 18 Jul 2006, Jim Gallacher wrote:


For 3.2.9 I called for 2 rounds of testing: one for the release
candidate and one for the final tarball. Do folks here feel that is
necessary for 3.2.10 or should I just jump right to the 3.2.10 final?
That tarball would still be subject to a vote on this list before an
official release. Cutting out the first step will save a few days.


I think what you term it doesn't matter - if it's voted down, it will be 
voted down, be it 3.2.10 RC or 3.2.10 Final (we'll just have to make a 
3.2.11 then).


So just go for it :-)

Grisha


Re: release 3.2.10?

2006-07-18 Thread Jorey Bump

Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy wrote:

(we'll just have to make a 
3.2.11 then).


Let's call that one the Spinal Tap version. :)


release 3.2.10?

2006-07-16 Thread Jim Gallacher
Shall we proceed with a 3.2.10 release with the current memory leak
fixes, or keep digging for more leaks?

Seeing as it's summer for most of us (except for Graham), I get the
feeling people don't have a lot of free time to spend on mod_python
right now. Personally I think we should release 3.2.10 now and make a
concerted effort to do a code review before a 3.3 release in October /
November.

Jim


release 3.2.10?

2006-07-16 Thread Graham Dumpleton
Jim Gallacher wrote ..
 Shall we proceed with a 3.2.10 release with the current memory leak
 fixes, or keep digging for more leaks?
 
 Seeing as it's summer for most of us (except for Graham), I get the
 feeling people don't have a lot of free time to spend on mod_python
 right now.

Just because it is winter down here and I'm freezing my butt off doesn't
mean I am any less busy. :-(

 Personally I think we should release 3.2.10 now and make a
 concerted effort to do a code review before a 3.3 release in October /
 November.

I agree we should just get the 3.2.10 release out. We are still going
to have to do the review for 3.3 anyway because some of the internal
structural changes I had to make in some areas to address some
issues have been significant.

Graham


Re: release 3.2.10?

2006-07-16 Thread Jim Gallacher
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
 Jim Gallacher wrote ..
 Shall we proceed with a 3.2.10 release with the current memory leak
 fixes, or keep digging for more leaks?

 Seeing as it's summer for most of us (except for Graham), I get the
 feeling people don't have a lot of free time to spend on mod_python
 right now.
 
 Just because it is winter down here and I'm freezing my butt off doesn't
 mean I am any less busy. :-(

Oh, I wasn't suggesting you were any less busy - just that folks in the
northern hemisphere may well choose to frolic in the summer sun rather
that hack away at mod_python in their spare time. :)

Jim