Re: [Python-Dev] Tracker cleanup roadmap

2009-02-17 Thread Martin v. Löwis
 Let's improve the tracker UI to better fit our needs. Then, classify
 them bugs and separate garbage from real development. Lastly, bug
 reporters should get a better UI. That's it,  any help is welcome.

The plan sounds great. I can help with the deployment aspects (reviewing
tracker patches, and deploying them on the tracker site), but not much
beyond that (except for discussions, of course). Don't expect too much
help from other people - I have been waiting for volunteers to show up
helping with the tracker for more than a year now.

I suggest you prioritize things by bang for the buck (is that the
right saying?), starting with changes that take least effort
to implement. Discussions should be carried out on the tracker-discuss
list, and, of course, in the meta-tracker.

Good luck,
Martin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


[Python-Dev] Patch logging module for IronPython compatibility

2009-02-17 Thread Michael Foord

Hello all,

Issue 5287 is a patch for the logging module for compatibility with
IronPython. IronPython provides sys._getframe but it throws an exception
if you call it with a non-zero depth. This may be fixed in a future
version of IronPython.

http://bugs.python.org/issue5287

It doesn't at all change the behaviour on other platforms (does an
explicit platform check I'm afraid) but fixes a nasty problem with the
logging module not working at all on IronPython. As this is a bugfix for
IronPython at least and IronPython 2.6 is currently being worked on
(tracking Python 2.6) it would be great to get this into 2.6-maint.

All the best,

Michael

--
http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog



___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] To 3.0.2 or not to 3.0.2?

2009-02-17 Thread Victor Stinner
Le Tuesday 17 February 2009 08:52:20 Lennart Regebro, vous avez écrit :
 On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 00:50, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
  Can you explain the difficulty with porting setuptools in more detail?

 Oh, it just exposes a bug in distutils. It probably means I'll have to
 make a test for python version, and if it is 3.0.1, monkey-patch
 distutils. I haven't really looked into if there is any other
 possibilities yet, I'm concentrating to make it run for 3.1 trunk
 first.

That's funny, because the failing code does compare versions :-)

...
  File c:\Python30\lib\distutils\cygwinccompiler.py, line 314, in __init__
if self.gcc_version = 2.91.57:
  File c:\Python30\lib\distutils\version.py, line 64, in __le__
c = self._cmp(other)
  File c:\Python30\lib\distutils\version.py, line 341, in _cmp
return cmp(self.version, other.version)
NameError: global name 'cmp' is not defined

-- 
Victor Stinner aka haypo
http://www.haypocalc.com/blog/
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] Patch logging module for IronPython compatibility

2009-02-17 Thread Michael Foord

Michael Foord wrote:

Hello all,

Issue 5287 is a patch for the logging module for compatibility with
IronPython. IronPython provides sys._getframe but it throws an exception
if you call it with a non-zero depth. This may be fixed in a future
version of IronPython.

http://bugs.python.org/issue5287

It doesn't at all change the behaviour on other platforms (does an
explicit platform check I'm afraid) but fixes a nasty problem with the
logging module not working at all on IronPython. As this is a bugfix for
IronPython at least and IronPython 2.6 is currently being worked on
(tracking Python 2.6) it would be great to get this into 2.6-maint.


I've submitted an alternative patch that catches the error _getframe 
raises on IronPython. As it is possible that _getframe will work on 
IronPython in the future (although it is likely to be enabled by a 
switch as tracking Python frames has a performance cost) this is a 
slightly more future proof solution.


Michael


All the best,

Michael




--
http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog


___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] To 3.0.2 or not to 3.0.2?

2009-02-17 Thread Samuele Pedroni

Victor Stinner wrote:

Le Tuesday 17 February 2009 08:52:20 Lennart Regebro, vous avez écrit :
  

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 00:50, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:


Can you explain the difficulty with porting setuptools in more detail?
  

Oh, it just exposes a bug in distutils. It probably means I'll have to
make a test for python version, and if it is 3.0.1, monkey-patch
distutils. I haven't really looked into if there is any other
possibilities yet, I'm concentrating to make it run for 3.1 trunk
first.



  
Didn't a test fail because of this? seems the underlying issue is that 
this part of the stdlib didn't have enough test coverage. It seems that 
having very good/improving test coverage like is recommended  for 
3rd-party project wanting to switch would be a good goal for 3.0 
evolution too. We know from PyPy experience that while always improving 
the test suite coverage is quite spotty at times.


___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] Wow!

2009-02-17 Thread Lie Ryan
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:04:35 +1300, Greg Ewing wrote:

 Leif Walsh wrote:
 
 If only we had a second Earth to mess with, we could just copy and
 swap.
 
 Or we could use a generational approach, doing all our messy stuff
 around the moon and copying to earth when we've got our traffic control
 issues sorted out.

Oh great, people not only trashed on the ground, but also the space. Have 
you never seen the garbage bin sign?

Wait a minute... the standard lib must have something about this...
import walle

___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] Closing outdated Mac issues

2009-02-17 Thread Ronald Oussoren


On 15 Feb, 2009, at 21:13, Daniel (ajax) Diniz wrote:


Hi,

In the discussion of a feature request for MacPython[1], the OP  
(hhas) said:


   As of Python 2.6/3.0, all Mac-specific modules are deprecated/ 
eliminated
   from the standard library and there are no longer any plans to  
submit

   appscript for possible inclusion. This issue should be rejected and
   closed.

If that is the current state of Mac modules, there are no less than 17
issues* that should be closed, 4 bug reports** that might be kept open
and 4 mixed-cases*** that might be obsolete/irrelevant.

Besides amounting to 1% of open issues, these can divert efforts to
bogus issues: I've submitted a patch for one of the mixed-cases (bug +
feature request), but now don't think it was worth it.

So, if someone could reassure / clarify the rules for closing these in
general and/or take a quick look at specific issues, that would be a
great help.


The Carbon bindings in 2.6 are deprecated and I don't intend to work  
on fixing them, and would advise against trying to fix issues with  
these modules unless you're personally affected by them.





Issue lists below.

Regards,
Daniel

[1] http://bugs.python.org/issue916013


Should have been closed ages ago.




* Feature requests and implementation polishing issues:

http://bugs.python.org/issue706585 Expose FinderInfo in FSCatalogInfo


Closed as won't fix.



http://bugs.python.org/issue706592 Carbon.File.FSSpec should accept
non-existing pathnames


Closed as won't fix.



http://bugs.python.org/issue776533 Carbon.Snd module SPB constructor  
shadowed


Closed as fixed (after reapplying the patch on the trunk)




http://bugs.python.org/issue779285 Carbon Event ReceiveNextEvent


Left this open for now, I have to have a better look at the actual  
code to check if it is worthwhile to keep this issue open.



http://bugs.python.org/issue806149 aetools.TalkTo methods can be  
obscured


Closed as won't fix



http://bugs.python.org/issue822005 Carbon.CarbonEvt.ReceiveNextEvent  
args wrong


Left this open for now, seems to be related to issue779285.



http://bugs.python.org/issue852150 Can't send Apple Events without
WindowServer connection


Closed as won't fix.



http://bugs.python.org/issue853656 Carbon.CF.CFURLRef should be  
easier to create


Closed as won't fix.




http://bugs.python.org/issue869649 Quicktime missing funcitonality


Closed as won't fix, even the C-level API is deprecated.



http://bugs.python.org/issue878560 Add a console window for Carbon
MacPython applets


Closed as won't fix.

[... Skip other issues ... : I'll have a look at these later on ]



** Probably out of  date, irrelevant or both:

http://bugs.python.org/issue779153 bgen requires Universal Headers,
not OS X dev headers


Should be closed, I'm not planning on recreating the Carbon bindings.




http://bugs.python.org/issue602291 Bgen should learn about booleans


This one is not related to OSX, appearently at least some people  
actually use Bgen for creating wrapper code.





http://bugs.python.org/issue775321 plistlib error handling

http://bugs.python.org/issue985064 plistlib crashes too easily on  
bad files


Plistlib is in the generic standard library in 2.6 and 3.0. I haven't  
checked yet if these issues are relevant at this point in time.


Ronald


___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ronaldoussoren%40mac.com




smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] draft 3.1 release schedule

2009-02-17 Thread Gregor Lingl



Benjamin Peterson schrieb:

On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 10:59 AM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote...
  



Something like this?

3.1a1 March 7
3.1a2 April 4
3.1b1 May 2
3.1rc1 May 30
3.1rc2 June 13
3.1 Final June 27

That sounds reasonable. I will try to enforce a fairly strict
stability policy during the beta and RCs.
  



I've started a list on the release PEP [1].

[1] http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0375/
  

Is the intention to release 2.7 and 3.1 in parallel?

I suspect, comparing this to

http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0373/

that there is some name mangling in pep-0375?

Regards,
Gregor
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] To 3.0.2 or not to 3.0.2?

2009-02-17 Thread Benjamin Peterson
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:25 AM, Samuele Pedroni pedro...@openend.se wrote:
 Didn't a test fail because of this? seems the underlying issue is that this
 part of the stdlib didn't have enough test coverage. It seems that having
 very good/improving test coverage like is recommended  for 3rd-party project
 wanting to switch would be a good goal for 3.0 evolution too. We know from
 PyPy experience that while always improving the test suite coverage is quite
 spotty at times.

No, a test didn't fail. Our new distutils maintainer, Tarek Ziade,
though, has been increasing the distutils test coverage greatly.



-- 
Regards,
Benjamin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


[Python-Dev] 2 very interesting projects - Python / Finance

2009-02-17 Thread David Russell
Dear Python Group,

 

First of all sorry for the unsolicited email,

 

I have attached two very interesting long term Python projects in the
Frankfurt area, Financial industry.

 

I am working exclusively with the client on both requirements,
interviews and contracts can be arranged very quickly.

 

You will be involved in a project to develop the next generation of
financial trading systems, this will be the biggest, fastest trading
system of its kind in the world and will be used on a global scale.

 

Financial experience is not a must, they are looking more for technical
skills here.

 

If the projects look interesting to you please feel free to contact me
on the contact details below.

 

Thank you for your help,

 

Best Regards

 

David

 

Large Financial Institution - Frankfurt

 

Senior Python C/C++ Developer  (f/m)

 

Tasks/Responsibilities

Software developer for a complex electronic trading system.

The software developer will work in the implementation team of the
trading

system; tasks include:

- Requirements Analysis

- Development of a Scripting framework based on Python

- Specification

- Implementation

Target platform will be Linux.

 

Qualifications/Required Skills (Mandatory)

Rock Solid Python and C/C++ knowledge

Integration of Python with C/C++ libraries

Automated Testing

Good overview and knowledge of open source software

Experience of software development in large projects

Good communications skills

Ability to work in project teams

A good command of English is a must.

 

Additional Domain  Business Skills

Knowledge of derivatives trading an advantage, in particular U.S.
options.

 

Additional Information:

Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Start ASAP for a minimum of 6 months

Rate - Negotiable

 

This is an urgent requirement please contact me or send me your cv as
soon as possible.

 

Contact: David Russell - Account manager

email: david.russ...@fdmgroup.com

Tel: +49 (0) 69 756 0050

Web: www.fdmgroup.com

 

 


///

 

Large Financial Institution - Frankfurt am Main

 

Performance / High Availability Test Automation Engineer (f/m)

 

Tasks/Responsibilities

Developer of automated test procedures for a high-performance electronic
trading system.

The engineer will work in the Performance and Technical Test team of the
project; tasks include:

- Requirements Analysis

- Development of distributed transaction feed procedures, mostly
in Python

- Implementation of automated result analysis

- Design and implementation of test procedures for
failover/recovery scenarios in a multi-tier environment

- Supervision of regular runs of the automated performance test
suite.

Target platform will be Linux.

 

Qualifications/Required Skills

Python scripting

Deep (3 years) knowledge of Linux, with a focus in the areas

  - Performance monitoring and tuning

  - Messaging architectures

Performance testing experience, for latency and throughput, incl. data
aggregation and reporting Good communications skills Experience of
software development in large projects Good overview and knowledge of
open source software Ability to work in an international project team.

 

A good command of English is a must.

 

Additional Domain  Business Skills

Knowledge of statistical data analysis methods would be an advantage.

Experience in mechanisms of interfacing C/C++ and Python would also be
advantageous.

Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Start ASAP to 31.12.09 with good extension prospects for 2010

Rate - Negotiable

 

This is an urgent requirement please contact me or send me your cv as
soon as possible.

 

Contact: David Russell - Account manager

email: david.russ...@fdmgroup.com

Tel: +49 (0) 69 756 0050

Web: www.fdmgroup.com

 

 

 

David Russell

Account Manager

 

FDM Group

 


 

 

Beethoven Strasse 4,

60325 Frankfurt am Main

Germany

david.russ...@fdmgroup.com mailto:ka...@fdmgroup.com 

 

Tel:  + 49 (0) 69 756 0050

Cell: + 49 (0) 173 3592288

Fax: + 49 (0) 69 756 00555

 

www.fdmgroup.com http://www.fdmgroup.com/   www.fdmacademy.com
http://www.fdmacademy.com/  

BRIGHTON, LONDON, MANCHESTER, LUXEMBOURG, FRANKFURT, ZURICH  NEW YORK

 

 

 


This message is from FDM Group Plc, and may contain information that is 
confidential or privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, please 
delete the message and any attachments and notify the sender.  This email is 
not intended to create legally binding commitments on behalf of FDM Group Plc, 
nor do its contents reflect the corporate views or policies of FDM.  Any 
unauthorised disclosure, use or dissemination, either whole or partial, is 
prohibited. FDM Group Plc is a private limited company registered in England 
(Reg. No. 2542980).



This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star 

Re: [Python-Dev] draft 3.1 release schedule

2009-02-17 Thread Benjamin Peterson
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:55 AM, Gregor Lingl gregor.li...@aon.at wrote:

 I've started a list on the release PEP [1].

 [1] http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0375/


 Is the intention to release 2.7 and 3.1 in parallel?

No.


 I suspect, comparing this to

 http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0373/

 that there is some name mangling in pep-0375?

It seems I left 2.7 in the prose a few times. I've fixed that now.



-- 
Regards,
Benjamin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] draft 3.1 release schedule

2009-02-17 Thread Barry Warsaw

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

On Feb 17, 2009, at 8:55 AM, Gregor Lingl wrote:


Is the intention to release 2.7 and 3.1 in parallel?


I don't think we should this time.  We want to get 3.1 out sooner than  
the typical 18 month development cycle, and I think we should  
concentrate on making that a great release without worrying about also  
trying to get 2.7 out.


:Barry

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)

iQCVAwUBSZrJ7HEjvBPtnXfVAQJEKAP/fQ/SWqCNYmPQreBdN4Y7BKC4+K0f9Kk6
7DuVEyjd/BI9luqLxeGgZFdm9cwBXNkrSQ0Vw9wGx5rjGWRxPhAzWPh3tSEUQzFb
wpQCqGkwktb7dxub4f+aeYBWJ802jrapfDXY48iRuGopCstm4IevjkZCesnMwrf7
fpOX6VDx5IQ=
=y5N7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


[Python-Dev] 2 very interesting projects - Python / Finance

2009-02-17 Thread David Russell
Dear Python Development Group,

 

First of all sorry for the unsolicited email,

 

I have attached two very interesting long term Python projects in the
Frankfurt area, Financial industry.

 

I am working exclusively with the client on both requirements,
interviews and contracts can be arranged very quickly.

 

You will be involved in a project to develop the next generation of
financial trading systems, this will be the biggest, fastest trading
system of its kind in the world and will be used on a global scale.

 

Financial experience is not a must, they are looking more for technical
skills here.

 

If the projects look interesting to you please feel free to contact me
on the contact details below.

 

Thank you for your help,

 

Best Regards

 

David

 

Large Financial Institution - Frankfurt

 

Senior Python C/C++ Developer  (f/m)

 

Tasks/Responsibilities

Software developer for a complex electronic trading system.

The software developer will work in the implementation team of the
trading

system; tasks include:

- Requirements Analysis

- Development of a Scripting framework based on Python

- Specification

- Implementation

Target platform will be Linux.

 

Qualifications/Required Skills (Mandatory)

Rock Solid Python and C/C++ knowledge

Integration of Python with C/C++ libraries

Automated Testing

Good overview and knowledge of open source software

Experience of software development in large projects

Good communications skills

Ability to work in project teams

A good command of English is a must.

 

Additional Domain  Business Skills

Knowledge of derivatives trading an advantage, in particular U.S.
options.

 

Additional Information:

Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Start ASAP for a minimum of 6 months

Rate - Negotiable

 

This is an urgent requirement please contact me or send me your cv as
soon as possible.

 

Contact: David Russell - Account manager

email: david.russ...@fdmgroup.com

Tel: +49 (0) 69 756 0050

Web: www.fdmgroup.com

 

 


///

 

Large Financial Institution - Frankfurt am Main

 

Performance / High Availability Test Automation Engineer (f/m)

 

Tasks/Responsibilities

Developer of automated test procedures for a high-performance electronic
trading system.

The engineer will work in the Performance and Technical Test team of the
project; tasks include:

- Requirements Analysis

- Development of distributed transaction feed procedures, mostly
in Python

- Implementation of automated result analysis

- Design and implementation of test procedures for
failover/recovery scenarios in a multi-tier environment

- Supervision of regular runs of the automated performance test
suite.

Target platform will be Linux.

 

Qualifications/Required Skills

Python scripting

Deep (3 years) knowledge of Linux, with a focus in the areas

  - Performance monitoring and tuning

  - Messaging architectures

Performance testing experience, for latency and throughput, incl. data
aggregation and reporting Good communications skills Experience of
software development in large projects Good overview and knowledge of
open source software Ability to work in an international project team.

 

A good command of English is a must.

 

Additional Domain  Business Skills

Knowledge of statistical data analysis methods would be an advantage.

Experience in mechanisms of interfacing C/C++ and Python would also be
advantageous.

Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Start ASAP to 31.12.09 with good extension prospects for 2010

Rate - Negotiable

 

This is an urgent requirement please contact me or send me your cv as
soon as possible.

 

Contact: David Russell - Account manager

email: david.russ...@fdmgroup.com

Tel: +49 (0) 69 756 0050

Web: www.fdmgroup.com

 

 

 

David Russell

Account Manager

 

FDM Group

 


 

 

Beethoven Strasse 4,

60325 Frankfurt am Main

Germany

david.russ...@fdmgroup.com mailto:ka...@fdmgroup.com 

 

Tel:  + 49 (0) 69 756 0050

Cell: + 49 (0) 173 3592288

Fax: + 49 (0) 69 756 00555

 

www.fdmgroup.com http://www.fdmgroup.com/   www.fdmacademy.com
http://www.fdmacademy.com/  

BRIGHTON, LONDON, MANCHESTER, LUXEMBOURG, FRANKFURT, ZURICH  NEW YORK

 

 

 


This message is from FDM Group Plc, and may contain information that is 
confidential or privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, please 
delete the message and any attachments and notify the sender.  This email is 
not intended to create legally binding commitments on behalf of FDM Group Plc, 
nor do its contents reflect the corporate views or policies of FDM.  Any 
unauthorised disclosure, use or dissemination, either whole or partial, is 
prohibited. FDM Group Plc is a private limited company registered in England 
(Reg. No. 2542980).



This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by 

Re: [Python-Dev] Tracker cleanup report

2009-02-17 Thread Daniel (ajax) Diniz
Paul Moore wrote:
 2009/2/16 Daniel (ajax) Diniz aja...@gmail.com:
 Hi,
 Here's a summary of what's been accomplished and what's almost done.
 This kinda marks the end of this Bug Season for me, but I'd like to do
 at least one more installment before PyCon.

 Can I, for one, offer a *huge* round of applause for what you've
 achieved. It's great to see the tracker getting some serious
 attention.

Thank you, but I can only take a small part of the kudos. It's been a
collective work, involving from the BDFL to issue reporters. Also,
lots of people have been taking care of the tracker.

Notably, Christian Heimes has done a lot of cleanup and updating in
early 2008, Facundo did the same earlier (2005, IIRC) and Benjamin
went through a lot of tickets during the 2.6/3.0 release cycle.

Martin, Benjamin, Victor and Hirokazu have spent a lot of time tidying
things up lately, and some nice fellows like Antoine, Mark, Nick
Coghlan, Amaury, and most cited above are constantly reviewing tickets
and offering feedback. Some people help fighting spam (e.g. Skip,
IIRC). Brett is hors concours regarding time spent for any
Python-related effort, so I won't mention him :D

There's also those recently organizing tickets in their area of
interest: Tarek is on top of distutils issues with lots of help from
Akira Kitada, Georg even has auto-assignment for doc issues, Jesse
Noller with multiprocessing, etc. Of course, this has always happened
to some degree, so lots of people have done that in the past, then
reduced their level of tracker-handling activity, are now back and
helping with lots of issues, e.g. Jack Jansen and Ronald Oussoren.

These are all from the top of my head, from diving into hundreds of
reports and following the tracker activity. Lots of other people I
fail to mention have taken the task of dealing with tickets for
themselves.

So kudos to everyone that invest time handling bugs, feature requests,
janitorial tasks and the eventual PEBKAC.

Thanks for the support!
Cheers,
Daniel
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] Closing outdated Mac issues

2009-02-17 Thread Daniel (ajax) Diniz
Hi Ned,

Ned Deily wrote:
 Other than Mac/Modules, the rest of the Mac/ directory is mainly stuff
 used for building or going into the OS X installer images, including
 things like IDLE.app.  These are used in 2.x and in 3.x.

Thanks, knowing that makes the ticket handling easier!

 There are 40 C files, two headers and 69 python files in /Mac in
 trunk. The 2.6 (and 2.5.x) docs say development has stopped and that
 they'd be replaced in 2.5. So ISTM closing RFEs for these modules
 would be an improvement.

  Honestly, fixing them is fine but since the modules are deprecated but
  still in existence in 2.x, but they are definitely nothing above a
  normal priority issue.
 OK, I'll let the bug reports open. What about RFEs?

 I think the reasonable thing to do is close them as not to be
 fixed/implemented.  At this point, the chances that someone would fix
 them are pretty slim and, in many cases, I'm sure the module is either
 obsolete because other, and better supported, solutions are now
 available, like PyObjC or appscript.  If people feel strongly about an
 issue, they can always ask to re-open it.

OK, Ronald is helping sort them and I'll clean whatever is left based
on your combined feedback.

 Taking a quick look at your list, the only ones that may be worth
 looking at are the plistlib ones since it lives on in 3.x.  I think all
 the rest are deprecated and gone in 3.x.

OK, plistlib is a keeper in my list now.

Thanks a lot for the feedback (and for helping with the Mac installers!)  :)

Regards,
Daniel
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] 2 very interesting projects - Python / Finance

2009-02-17 Thread Aahz
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009, David Russell wrote:

 Dear Python Development Group,
 
 First of all sorry for the unsolicited email,

This is spam, and you have now jeopardized your correct posting to the
Python Job Board.  The other website administrators will be informed and
we will discuss whether spamming python-dev warrants withdrawing it.
-- 
Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com)   * http://www.pythoncraft.com/

Weinberg's Second Law: If builders built buildings the way programmers wrote 
programs, then the first woodpecker that came along would destroy civilization.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] Closing outdated Mac issues

2009-02-17 Thread Daniel (ajax) Diniz
Hi, Ronald,

Ronald Oussoren wrote:

 On 15 Feb, 2009, at 21:13, Daniel (ajax) Diniz wrote:

 Hi,

 In the discussion of a feature request for MacPython[1], the OP (hhas) said:

   As of Python 2.6/3.0, all Mac-specific modules are deprecated/eliminated
   from the standard library and there are no longer any plans to submit
   appscript for possible inclusion. This issue should be rejected and
   closed.
[...]
 So, if someone could reassure / clarify the rules for closing these in
 general and/or take a quick look at specific issues, that would be a
 great help.

 The Carbon bindings in 2.6 are deprecated and I don't intend to work on 
 fixing them, and would advise against trying to fix issues with these modules 
 unless you're personally affected by them.

OK.

 [1] http://bugs.python.org/issue916013

 Should have been closed ages ago.

[snip]
 http://bugs.python.org/issue776533 Carbon.Snd module SPB constructor shadowed

 Closed as fixed (after reapplying the patch on the trunk)
[...]
 http://bugs.python.org/issue779285 Carbon Event ReceiveNextEvent

 Left this open for now, I have to have a better look at the actual code to 
 check if it is worthwhile to keep this issue open.

Wow, thanks a lot for taking care of all these issues! If you need a
hand to close, assign or just update any of them, I'd be glad to help.
I'll put any closing of these on hold until you're done, I have no
hurry :)

 http://bugs.python.org/issue779153 bgen requires Universal Headers,
 not OS X dev headers

 Should be closed, I'm not planning on recreating the Carbon bindings.

OK, I'll add a 'will close unless someone who needs this comes
forward' note on this one, but will leave it open for a while as it
might help in wrapping code.


 http://bugs.python.org/issue602291 Bgen should learn about booleans

 This one is not related to OSX, appearently at least some people actually use 
 Bgen for creating wrapper code.

Thanks, will update it and leave open.

 http://bugs.python.org/issue775321 plistlib error handling

 http://bugs.python.org/issue985064 plistlib crashes too easily on bad files

 Plistlib is in the generic standard library in 2.6 and 3.0. I haven't checked 
 yet if these issues are relevant at this point in time.

They are not, I'll work on tests/patches for them.

Thanks for handling these and for the valuable feedback, Ronald!

Daniel
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] Tracker cleanup report

2009-02-17 Thread Daniel (ajax) Diniz
Brett Cannon wrote:

 Ditto from me! And I will eventually get to the bugs assigned to me 
 (hopefully starting some time this week).


No hurry, just let me know if you see stupid mistakes on my part (I've
once or twice added an issue as its own dependency) :)

Daniel
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] Tracker cleanup report

2009-02-17 Thread Daniel (ajax) Diniz
Jack Jansen wrote:
 I had a cursory look at these issues as they came by, and I didn't see any 
 that struck me as still being relevant.


Thanks a lot for the feedback, Jack!

Daniel
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] 2 very interesting projects - Python / Finance

2009-02-17 Thread David Russell
Dear Aahz,

I understand your point but the line should be drawn between somebody
selling Viagra or insurance to someone like me who is offering an
opportunity to a suitable candidate to work on a Python project
developing a new global trading system for a world leading financial
institution.

I am not trying to sell something or take something away from anybody
nor am I offering something that does not exist, I am broadcasting a
realistic, solid opportunity to a group of people that may benefit from
it. 

Looking at the current global job climate I would have thought this type
of email would be welcomed by the Python community?

If you don't agree then do what you have to do and report me to the
other web administrators.

Maybe you should start a list that users can join to receive project
offers? It makes sense.

Best regards

David Russell
Account Manager

FDM Group

Beethoven Strasse 4,
60325 Frankfurt am Main
Germany


-Original Message-
From: Aahz [mailto:a...@pythoncraft.com] 
Sent: 17 February 2009 15:39
To: David Russell
Cc: Python-Dev@python.org
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] 2 very interesting projects - Python / Finance

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009, David Russell wrote:

 Dear Python Development Group,
 
 First of all sorry for the unsolicited email,

This is spam, and you have now jeopardized your correct posting to the
Python Job Board.  The other website administrators will be informed and
we will discuss whether spamming python-dev warrants withdrawing it.
-- 
Aahz (a...@pythoncraft.com)   *
http://www.pythoncraft.com/

Weinberg's Second Law: If builders built buildings the way programmers
wrote 
programs, then the first woodpecker that came along would destroy
civilization.


This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk


This message is from FDM Group Plc, and may contain information that is 
confidential or privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, please 
delete the message and any attachments and notify the sender.  This email is 
not intended to create legally binding commitments on behalf of FDM Group Plc, 
nor do its contents reflect the corporate views or policies of FDM.  Any 
unauthorised disclosure, use or dissemination, either whole or partial, is 
prohibited. FDM Group Plc is a private limited company registered in England 
(Reg. No. 2542980).



This e-mail has been scanned for all viruses by Star Internet. The
service is powered by MessageLabs. For more information on a proactive
anti-virus service working around the clock, around the globe, visit:
http://www.star.net.uk

___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] 2 very interesting projects - Python / Finance

2009-02-17 Thread Tim Peters
[Aahz]
 ...
 This is spam, and you have now jeopardized your correct posting to the
 Python Job Board.  The other website administrators will be informed and
 we will discuss whether spamming python-dev warrants withdrawing it.

To be fair, a python-dev moderator approved the posting, so in their
judgment it wasn't spam.

It was in my judgment, but someone else approved it before I managed
to hit the discard button.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] 2 very interesting projects - Python / Finance

2009-02-17 Thread Steve Holden
David:

Perhaps you'd  like to give me your company's internal mailing list
address so I can drop your staff a line when I hear of Python
conferences going on your area. Or maybe that's not what the list is for?

This list, as is clearly stated at

  http://www.python.org/community/lists/

is for work on developing Python. Hence your posting (and your
protestations of innocence) is unsolicited commercial email, AKA spam.
Python users who are looking for jobs know about the jobs board, where
you have already submitted vacancy notices (now jeopardized by this
anti-social act). Please stop now - if you must reply, feel free to do
so by private email.

regards
 Steve

David Russell wrote:
 Dear Aahz,
 
 I understand your point but the line should be drawn between somebody
 selling Viagra or insurance to someone like me who is offering an
 opportunity to a suitable candidate to work on a Python project
 developing a new global trading system for a world leading financial
 institution.
 
 I am not trying to sell something or take something away from anybody
 nor am I offering something that does not exist, I am broadcasting a
 realistic, solid opportunity to a group of people that may benefit from
 it. 
 
 Looking at the current global job climate I would have thought this type
 of email would be welcomed by the Python community?
 
 If you don't agree then do what you have to do and report me to the
 other web administrators.
 
 Maybe you should start a list that users can join to receive project
 offers? It makes sense.
 
 Best regards
 
 David Russell
 Account Manager
 
 FDM Group
 
 Beethoven Strasse 4,
 60325 Frankfurt am Main
 Germany
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Aahz [mailto:a...@pythoncraft.com] 
 Sent: 17 February 2009 15:39
 To: David Russell
 Cc: Python-Dev@python.org
 Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] 2 very interesting projects - Python / Finance
 
 On Tue, Feb 17, 2009, David Russell wrote:
 Dear Python Development Group,

 First of all sorry for the unsolicited email,
 
 This is spam, and you have now jeopardized your correct posting to the
 Python Job Board.  The other website administrators will be informed and
 we will discuss whether spamming python-dev warrants withdrawing it.


-- 
Steve Holden+1 571 484 6266   +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC  http://www.holdenweb.com/

___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] 2 very interesting projects - Python / Finance

2009-02-17 Thread Steve Holden
Steve Holden wrote:
 David:
 
 Perhaps you'd  like to give me your company's internal mailing list
 address so I can drop your staff a line when I hear of Python
 conferences going on your area. Or maybe that's not what the list is for?
 
[...]
Just to close this out Aahz and I received an apologetic reply by
private email.

regards
 Steve
-- 
Steve Holden+1 571 484 6266   +1 800 494 3119
Holden Web LLC  http://www.holdenweb.com/

___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] 2 very interesting projects - Python / Finance

2009-02-17 Thread Michael Foord

Tim Peters wrote:

[Aahz]
  

...
This is spam, and you have now jeopardized your correct posting to the
Python Job Board.  The other website administrators will be informed and
we will discuss whether spamming python-dev warrants withdrawing it.



To be fair, a python-dev moderator approved the posting, so in their
judgment it wasn't spam.

  


I saw it in the queue and hit reject. I think he may have signed up and 
reposted - either that or I *didn't* hit reject when I intended to.


Michael

It was in my judgment, but someone else approved it before I managed
to hit the discard button.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/fuzzyman%40voidspace.org.uk
  



--
http://www.ironpythoninaction.com/
http://www.voidspace.org.uk/blog


___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] 2 very interesting projects - Python / Finance

2009-02-17 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman

On 17/02/2009 17:55, Steve Holden wrote:

is for work on developing Python. Hence your posting (and your
protestations of innocence) is unsolicited commercial email, AKA spam.
Python users who are looking for jobs know about the jobs board, where
you have already submitted vacancy notices (now jeopardized by this
anti-social act). Please stop now - if you must reply, feel free to do
so by private email.


I'd like to mention that python-nl got this, too, so he probably spammed 
a bunch of lists.


Cheers,

Dirkjan

___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


[Python-Dev] 30-bit PyLong digits in 3.1?

2009-02-17 Thread Mark Dickinson
A few months ago there was a discussion [1] about changing
Python's long integer type to use base 2**30 instead of base
2**15.  http://bugs.python.org/issue4258 was opened for this.

With much help from many people (but especially Antoine
and Victor), I've finally managed to put together an
essentially finished patch for this (see 30bit_longdigit14.patch
in the tracker).

I'd like to get this in for 3.1. Any objections or comments?
Is this PEP territory?

Summary of the patch:

* Apart from improved performance, the effects should be
  almost entirely invisible to users.

* By default, 30-bit digits are used only when both 32-bit
  and 64-bit integer types are available; otherwise the
  code falls back to the usual 15-bit digits.  For Unix, there's
  a configure option --enable-big-digits that overrides this
  default.  In particular, you can use --disable-big-digits
  to force 15-bit digit longs.

* There's a new structseq sys.int_info that looks like this:

 sys.int_info
sys.int_info(bits_per_digit=30, sizeof_digit=4)

  the sizeof_digit is mostly there to help out the sys.getsizeof
  tests in test_sys.

* Benchmarks show significant speedups (20% and more)
  for integer arithmetic
  on 64-bit systems, and lesser speedups on 32-bit systems.
  Operations with single-digit integers aren't affected much
  either way;  most of the benefit seems to be for operations
  with small multi-digit integers.

* There are more performance improvements planned (see
   the issue discussion for details);  I left them out of the
   current patch for simplicity, and because they still need
   proper testing and benchmarking.

Mark

[1] http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2008-November/083315.html
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] 30-bit PyLong digits in 3.1?

2009-02-17 Thread Martin v. Löwis
 I'd like to get this in for 3.1. Any objections or comments?

Can you please upload it to Rietveld also?

 Is this PEP territory?

I don't think so.

Martin

___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


[Python-Dev] Python 2.6.2 and 3.0.2

2009-02-17 Thread Barry Warsaw

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Thinking again about 3.0.2.

If we'd like to do bug fix releases before Pycon, I suggest Monday  
March 9th for code freeze and tagging.  That would mean a Tuesday  
March 10th release.


What do you think?
Barry

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)

iQCVAwUBSZsbpHEjvBPtnXfVAQK5xgP/XIKmhKSbQLQ4rZvknkhDTel6R8w14/7Z
lThGtuFJd3eKE4EOO3CP/zT8LT0rHTRkF1wGUZjyNoLW6bIQkGiTQYWxOsTV+Z7z
Ak49VzUpf0KySd4Nwtzn/KxQ+z/i3ts3z5YRD9eWBs0ZtTAiOelZrTxievcWZt+6
0PpsQWGb+14=
=caaa
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] 30-bit PyLong digits in 3.1?

2009-02-17 Thread Mark Dickinson
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
 Can you please upload it to Rietveld also?

Will do.  I'm getting a 500 Server Error at the moment, but I'll keep trying.

Mark
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] 30-bit PyLong digits in 3.1?

2009-02-17 Thread Guido van Rossum
Use the upload.py script (/static/upload.py) rather than the Create Issue page.

On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 12:36 PM, Mark Dickinson dicki...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 7:49 PM, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:
 Can you please upload it to Rietveld also?

 Will do.  I'm getting a 500 Server Error at the moment, but I'll keep 
 trying.

 Mark
 ___
 Python-Dev mailing list
 Python-Dev@python.org
 http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
 Unsubscribe: 
 http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org




-- 
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] 30-bit PyLong digits in 3.1?

2009-02-17 Thread Mark Dickinson
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
 Use the upload.py script (/static/upload.py) rather than the Create Issue 
 page.

Thanks.  That worked.

http://codereview.appspot.com/14105
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] To 3.0.2 or not to 3.0.2?

2009-02-17 Thread Georg Brandl
Benjamin Peterson schrieb:
 On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:25 AM, Samuele Pedroni pedro...@openend.se wrote:
 Didn't a test fail because of this? seems the underlying issue is that this
 part of the stdlib didn't have enough test coverage. It seems that having
 very good/improving test coverage like is recommended  for 3rd-party project
 wanting to switch would be a good goal for 3.0 evolution too. We know from
 PyPy experience that while always improving the test suite coverage is quite
 spotty at times.
 
 No, a test didn't fail. Our new distutils maintainer, Tarek Ziade,
 though, has been increasing the distutils test coverage greatly.

In addition to testing, this specific issue could have been found easily by
running something like pylint over the stdlib, because undefined globals
are one of the things they can detect with 100% accuracy...

The hard thing about pylint of course is to get the signal/noise ratio right :)

Georg

-- 
Thus spake the Lord: Thou shalt indent with four spaces. No more, no less.
Four shall be the number of spaces thou shalt indent, and the number of thy
indenting shall be four. Eight shalt thou not indent, nor either indent thou
two, excepting that thou then proceed to four. Tabs are right out.

___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] Issues to be closed: objections?

2009-02-17 Thread John J Lee

On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, Daniel (ajax) Diniz wrote:

http://bugs.python.org/issue809887 Improve pdb breakpoint feedback


Why this one?


John

___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] To 3.0.2 or not to 3.0.2?

2009-02-17 Thread Benjamin Peterson
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 3:02 PM, Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net wrote:
 Benjamin Peterson schrieb:
 On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 5:25 AM, Samuele Pedroni pedro...@openend.se wrote:
 Didn't a test fail because of this? seems the underlying issue is that this
 part of the stdlib didn't have enough test coverage. It seems that having
 very good/improving test coverage like is recommended  for 3rd-party project
 wanting to switch would be a good goal for 3.0 evolution too. We know from
 PyPy experience that while always improving the test suite coverage is quite
 spotty at times.

 No, a test didn't fail. Our new distutils maintainer, Tarek Ziade,
 though, has been increasing the distutils test coverage greatly.

 In addition to testing, this specific issue could have been found easily by
 running something like pylint over the stdlib, because undefined globals
 are one of the things they can detect with 100% accuracy...

Oh, does pylint support py3k now?


 The hard thing about pylint of course is to get the signal/noise ratio right 
 :)




-- 
Regards,
Benjamin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


[Python-Dev] -Qwarn and -3

2009-02-17 Thread Raymond Hettinger

If someone sets the -3 option to get py3k warnings, should the classic division 
warning get turned-on automatically?

Right now, I get no warnings for:

  python -3 -c 9 / 5



Raymond
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] -Qwarn and -3

2009-02-17 Thread Guido van Rossum
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Raymond Hettinger pyt...@rcn.com wrote:
 If someone sets the -3 option to get py3k warnings, should the classic
 division warning get turned-on automatically?

 Right now, I get no warnings for:

  python -3 -c 9 / 5

I think you have a point.

-- 
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] Issues to be closed: objections?

2009-02-17 Thread Daniel (ajax) Diniz
John J Lee wrote:
 On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, Daniel (ajax) Diniz wrote:

 http://bugs.python.org/issue809887 Improve pdb breakpoint feedback

 Why this one?

Nice catch, this makes no sense. The patch even applies almost
cleanly. I'll update it and set the others to pending, so further
objections can be voiced.

Thank for reviewing, John!

Daniel
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com


Re: [Python-Dev] Tracker cleanup roadmap

2009-02-17 Thread Brett Cannon
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 00:15, Martin v. Löwis mar...@v.loewis.de wrote:

  Let's improve the tracker UI to better fit our needs. Then, classify
  them bugs and separate garbage from real development. Lastly, bug
  reporters should get a better UI. That's it,  any help is welcome.

 The plan sounds great.


Yeah, the workflow needs work. I was hoping to try to clean it up once I got
the current workflow documented but you beat me to it (which is a good
thing).


 I can help with the deployment aspects (reviewing
 tracker patches, and deploying them on the tracker site), but not much
 beyond that (except for discussions, of course). Don't expect too much
 help from other people - I have been waiting for volunteers to show up
 helping with the tracker for more than a year now.


We can try another volunteer call at PyCon if we want. I can plug it heavily
during my talk.



 I suggest you prioritize things by bang for the buck (is that the
 right saying?)


It's actually most bang for your buck, but close enough.


 , starting with changes that take least effort
 to implement. Discussions should be carried out on the tracker-discuss
 list, and, of course, in the meta-tracker.


What Martin said. =)

-Brett
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com