Re: [Python-Dev] [python-committers] Do we need to sign Windows files with GnuPG?
Am 05.04.15 um 06:43 schrieb Steve Dower: Now I just have to find the time to learn how to use it... I always sign with Kleopatra on Windows. It's really simple: just drag all files you want to sign onto it, configure detached signatures, and it will place the signature next to the original file. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] [python-committers] Do we need to sign Windows files with GnuPG?
Am 04.04.15 um 21:54 schrieb M.-A. Lemburg: FWIW: The PSF mostly uses StartSSL nowadays and they also support code signing certificates. Given that this option is a lot cheaper than Verisign, I think we should switch, unless there are significant reasons not to. We should revisit this in 2017. Agree - apparently the starlssl process for getting a signing cert is complex/obscure, so we should start early. Not really. Once you have the org verification it's really easy. Let me know if I can help providing PSF organization verification. I already completed that for the current cycle. I had asked the PSF for a StartSSL certificate when the previous certificate expired, and the PSF was not able to provide one. After waiting several weeks for the PSF to provide the certificate, Kurt then kindly went to Verisign. Kind regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Not being able to compile: make: *** [Programs/_freeze_importlib] Error 1
On Thu, 16 Apr 2015 18:09:01 -0300, Facundo Batista facundobati...@gmail.com wrote: Full trace here: http://linkode.org/TgkzZw90JUaoodvYzU7zX6 Before going into a deep debug, I thought about sending a mail to see if anybode else hit this issue, if it's a common problem, if there's a known workaround. Most likely you just need to run 'make touch' so that it doesn't try to rebuild stuff it doesn't need to (because we check in those particular build artifacts, like the frozen importlib). --David ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Python-Dev] Not being able to compile: make: *** [Programs/_freeze_importlib] Error 1
Hello! It's been a while since I compiled python and run the test suite. Now that I'm starting to work in a patch, wanted to do that as a sanity check, and even ./configure finishing ok, make fails :/ (I'm on Ubuntu Trusty, all packages updated, all dependencies theorically installed). Full trace here: http://linkode.org/TgkzZw90JUaoodvYzU7zX6 Before going into a deep debug, I thought about sending a mail to see if anybode else hit this issue, if it's a common problem, if there's a known workaround. Thanks!! -- .Facundo Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/ PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/ Twitter: @facundobatista ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Python3 Stable ABI
Am 13.04.15 um 23:28 schrieb Zachary Ware: In issue23903, I've created a script that will produce PC/python3.def by scraping the header files in Include. See my comment in the issue. Having a script to check is good; having it generate the def file automatically is bad. It's typically the case that changes to the header files didn't consider the stable ABI, so each change needs to be reviewed manually. Typically, further changes to other source files will be necessary. Regards, Martin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] [python-committers] Do we need to sign Windows files with GnuPG?
On 16.04.2015 21:34, Martin v. Löwis wrote: Am 04.04.15 um 21:54 schrieb M.-A. Lemburg: FWIW: The PSF mostly uses StartSSL nowadays and they also support code signing certificates. Given that this option is a lot cheaper than Verisign, I think we should switch, unless there are significant reasons not to. We should revisit this in 2017. Agree - apparently the starlssl process for getting a signing cert is complex/obscure, so we should start early. Not really. Once you have the org verification it's really easy. Let me know if I can help providing PSF organization verification. I already completed that for the current cycle. I had asked the PSF for a StartSSL certificate when the previous certificate expired, and the PSF was not able to provide one. After waiting several weeks for the PSF to provide the certificate, Kurt then kindly went to Verisign. When was that ? I never received such a request. The account I'm using was created in Dec 2014 and the validation received on 2014-12-17. This is valid for about a year: https://wiki.python.org/psf/PSF%20SSL%20Certificates Code signing certificates are valid for two years, so switching to StartSSL probably doesn't make much sense now, unless perhaps we want to switch to SHA2 and longer RSA keys (if that's possible for code signing certs - I'd have to check). -- Marc-Andre Lemburg eGenix.com Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Apr 17 2015) Python Projects, Coaching and Consulting ... http://www.egenix.com/ mxODBC Plone/Zope Database Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/ mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ...http://python.egenix.com/ : Try our mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! :: eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH Pastor-Loeh-Str.48 D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611 http://www.egenix.com/company/contact/ ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Python-Dev] How to behave regarding commiting
Hola! I'm asking this because quite some time passed since I was active in the development of our beloved language. I'm trying to not break any new rule not known by me. I opened a bug recently [0], somebody else proposed a patch that I like. However, that patch has no test. I will do a test for that code, but then what? Shall I just commit and push? Or the whole branch should be proposed for further reviewing? Thank you!! [0] http://bugs.python.org/issue23887 -- .Facundo Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/ PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/ Twitter: @facundobatista ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] How to behave regarding commiting
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Facundo Batista facundobati...@gmail.com wrote: Hola! I'm asking this because quite some time passed since I was active in the development of our beloved language. I'm trying to not break any new rule not known by me. I opened a bug recently [0], somebody else proposed a patch that I like. However, that patch has no test. I will do a test for that code, but then what? Shall I just commit and push? Or the whole branch should be proposed for further reviewing? Hi, Since writing a test for that patch is simple, I'd just commit it to the default branch. --Berker ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Not being able to compile: make: *** [Programs/_freeze_importlib] Error 1
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 6:34 PM, R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com wrote: Most likely you just need to run 'make touch' so that it doesn't try to rebuild stuff it doesn't need to (because we check in those particular build artifacts, like the frozen importlib). make touch didn't fix it, but when doing that I noticed this message: Modules/Setup.dist is newer than Modules/Setup; check to make sure you have all the updates you need in your Modules/Setup file. Usually, copying Modules/Setup.dist to Modules/Setup will work. I copied that file, and then make touch, and then the make finished OK!!! Should we update the developer guide with these instructions, or all this is unlikely to happen? Thanks!! -- .Facundo Blog: http://www.taniquetil.com.ar/plog/ PyAr: http://www.python.org/ar/ Twitter: @facundobatista ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
