Re: [Python-Dev] for...else
On 28/07/2017 20:57, MRAB wrote: On 2017-07-28 10:17, Michel Desmoulin wrote: elif break and elif None: I'd like that very much. It's weird a break the semantic of break and None, but it's in such a dark corner of Python anyway I don't bother. Surely it would not be "elif break", but "elif not break"? To me, anything beginning with "else" or "elif" suggests an alternative branch, not an additional one (YMMV): if condition: do_something else: do_something_completely_different Therefore I would find "if not break" or even "and if not break" more intuitive. Best wishes Rob Cliffe Le 27/07/2017 à 21:19, MRAB a écrit : On 2017-07-27 03:34, Mike Miller wrote: On 2017-07-26 16:36, MRAB wrote: "nobreak" would introduce a new keyword, but "not break" wouldn't. Whenever I've used the for-else, I've put a # no-break right next to it, to remind myself as much as anyone else. for...: not break: is the best alternative I've yet seen, congrats. Perhaps in Python 5 it can be enabled, with for-else: used instead for empty iterables, as that's what I expected the first few dozen times. For empty iterables, how about "elif None:"? :-) ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/rob.cliffe%40btinternet.com --- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. http://www.avg.com ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] for...else
On 2017-07-28 10:17, Michel Desmoulin wrote: elif break and elif None: I'd like that very much. It's weird a break the semantic of break and None, but it's in such a dark corner of Python anyway I don't bother. Surely it would not be "elif break", but "elif not break"? Le 27/07/2017 à 21:19, MRAB a écrit : On 2017-07-27 03:34, Mike Miller wrote: On 2017-07-26 16:36, MRAB wrote: "nobreak" would introduce a new keyword, but "not break" wouldn't. Whenever I've used the for-else, I've put a # no-break right next to it, to remind myself as much as anyone else. for...: not break: is the best alternative I've yet seen, congrats. Perhaps in Python 5 it can be enabled, with for-else: used instead for empty iterables, as that's what I expected the first few dozen times. For empty iterables, how about "elif None:"? :-) ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Python-Dev] Summary of Python tracker Issues
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2017-07-21 - 2017-07-28)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open6088 (+30)
closed 36736 (+57)
total 42824 (+87)
Open issues with patches: 2337
Issues opened (72)
==
#26732: multiprocessing sentinel resource leak
http://bugs.python.org/issue26732 reopened by haypo
#28734: argparse: successive parsing wipes out nargs=? values
http://bugs.python.org/issue28734 reopened by paul.j3
#29512: regrtest refleak: implement bisection feature
http://bugs.python.org/issue29512 reopened by haypo
#30188: test_nntplib: random EOFError in setUpClass()
http://bugs.python.org/issue30188 reopened by haypo
#30778: test_bsddb3 crash on x86 Windows XP 2.7
http://bugs.python.org/issue30778 reopened by haypo
#30985: Set closing variable in asyncore at close
http://bugs.python.org/issue30985 opened by walkhour
#30986: Add --include-py argument to Tools/msi/make_zip.py
http://bugs.python.org/issue30986 opened by Segev Finer
#30987: Support for ISO-TP protocol in SocketCAN
http://bugs.python.org/issue30987 opened by Pier-Yves Lessard
#30988: Exception parsing invalid email address headers starting or en
http://bugs.python.org/issue30988 opened by timb07
#30989: Sort only when needed in TimedRotatingFileHandler's getFilesTo
http://bugs.python.org/issue30989 opened by Lovesh Harchandani
#30990: Calls to C functions using `.__call__` don't get sent to profi
http://bugs.python.org/issue30990 opened by ppperry
#30991: test_ctypes ,test_dbm and test_ssl fail on arm64 (aarch64) ar
http://bugs.python.org/issue30991 opened by jonny789
#30992: Invalid PGP Key Prevents Archive Validation
http://bugs.python.org/issue30992 opened by cwprogram
#30995: Support logging.getLogger(style='{')
http://bugs.python.org/issue30995 opened by mitar
#30996: add coroutine AbstractEventLoop.sock_close
http://bugs.python.org/issue30996 opened by cfy
#30997: TestCase.subTest and expectedFailure
http://bugs.python.org/issue30997 opened by ronaldoussoren
#30999: statistics module: add "key" keyword argument to median, mode,
http://bugs.python.org/issue30999 opened by gerion
#31000: Test failure in resource module on ZFS
http://bugs.python.org/issue31000 opened by larry
#31001: IDLE: Add tests for configdialog highlight tab
http://bugs.python.org/issue31001 opened by terry.reedy
#31002: IDLE: Add tests for configdialog keys tab
http://bugs.python.org/issue31002 opened by terry.reedy
#31004: IDLE, configdialog: Factor out FontTab class from ConfigDialog
http://bugs.python.org/issue31004 opened by terry.reedy
#31005: caught and stored exception creates a reference cycle outside
http://bugs.python.org/issue31005 opened by vojtechfried
#31006: typing.NamedTuple should add annotations to its constructor (_
http://bugs.python.org/issue31006 opened by Antony.Lee
#31007: ERROR: test_pipe_handle (test.test_asyncio.test_windows_utils.
http://bugs.python.org/issue31007 opened by haypo
#31008: FAIL: test_wait_for_handle (test.test_asyncio.test_windows_eve
http://bugs.python.org/issue31008 opened by haypo
#31010: test_socketserver.test_ForkingTCPServer(): threading_cleanup()
http://bugs.python.org/issue31010 opened by haypo
#31011: Users (except from the one who installed) not able to see pyt
http://bugs.python.org/issue31011 opened by Debarshi.Goswami
#31012: suggestion: allow termination argument in argparse to be speci
http://bugs.python.org/issue31012 opened by Leon Avery
#31013: gcc7 throws warning when pymem.h development header is used
http://bugs.python.org/issue31013 opened by Gabriel Somlo
#31014: webbrowser._synthesize uses outdated calling signature for web
http://bugs.python.org/issue31014 opened by jmsdvl
#31015: PyErr_WriteUnraisable should be more verbose in Python 2.7
http://bugs.python.org/issue31015 opened by christian.aguil...@foundry.com
#31016: [Regression] sphinx shows an EOF error when using python2.7 fr
http://bugs.python.org/issue31016 opened by doko
#31020: Add support for custom compressor in tarfile
http://bugs.python.org/issue31020 opened by insomniacslk
#31021: Clarify programming faq.
http://bugs.python.org/issue31021 opened by terry.reedy
#31022: ERROR: testRegularFile (test.test_socket.SendfileUsingSendTest
http://bugs.python.org/issue31022 opened by haypo
#31024: typing.Tuple is class but is defined as data inside https://do
http://bugs.python.org/issue31024 opened by Bernát Gábor
#31026: test_dbm fails when run directly
http://bugs.python.org/issue31026 opened by serhiy.storchaka
#31027: test_listcomps fails when run directly
http://bugs.python.org/issue31027 opened by serhiy.storchaka
#31028: test_pydoc fails when run directly
http://bugs.python.org/issue31028 opened by serhiy.storchaka
#31029: test_tokenize fails when run directly
http://bugs.python.org/issue31029 opened
Re: [Python-Dev] for...else
elif break and elif None: I'd like that very much. It's weird a break the semantic of break and None, but it's in such a dark corner of Python anyway I don't bother. Le 27/07/2017 à 21:19, MRAB a écrit : > On 2017-07-27 03:34, Mike Miller wrote: >> >> >> On 2017-07-26 16:36, MRAB wrote: >>> "nobreak" would introduce a new keyword, but "not break" wouldn't. >> >> Whenever I've used the for-else, I've put a # no-break right next to >> it, to >> remind myself as much as anyone else. >> >> for...: not break: is the best alternative I've yet seen, congrats. >> Perhaps in >> Python 5 it can be enabled, with for-else: used instead for empty >> iterables, as >> that's what I expected the first few dozen times. >> > For empty iterables, how about "elif None:"? :-) > ___ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/desmoulinmichel%40gmail.com > ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
