[Python-Dev] Re: RFC for PEP 663: Improving and Standardizing Enum str(), repr(), and format() behaviors
On 7/21/21 5:33 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > I don't have any substantive comments on what you're proposing (aside > from "Yes, that sounds reasonable to me"), so my comments below are > just some minor suggested clarifications for the PEP text. Thanks, PEP updated. -- ~Ethan~ ___ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/KGK3P2L26GMKSMLN5RI2FLY4YITZVY2R/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
[Python-Dev] [slightly OT] cryptographically strong random.SystemRandom()
Greetings! A question [1] has arisen about the viability of `random.SystemRandom` in Pythons before and after the secrets module was introduced (3.5 I think) -- specifically does it give independent and uniform discrete distribution for cryptographic purposes across CPython 3.x versions? Any help appreciated! -- ~Ethan~ [1] https://stackoverflow.com/q/68319071/208880 ___ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/JH5BS7FBK3EA4I7NJDD6GG3G56YXMDFC/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
[Python-Dev] Re: SC 2020 recommendation for PEP 634
On 12/7/20 11:29 AM, Brett Cannon wrote: After much deliberation, the 2020 SC will be making a recommendation to the 2021 SC to accept PEP 634 (although this was not a unanimous decision). This seems very odd. The Steering Council is elected to make decisions, but it feels like the current SC is passing the buck. You (the current SC) have spent much time on this, so it seems that you are in the best position to make a final decision. If you don't, then the next SC may have to also spend a lot of time on the issue as well to be comfortable accepting your recommendation -- time that could be better spent on other issues. If you (the current SC) were actually accepting PEP 634, would the vote be the same? Then accept it, and let's all move on. -- ~Ethan~ ___ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/EP7GRKHV7OGRA5S44LIELFMVKILEUS2I/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
