Re: [Python-Dev] Issues to be closed: objections?
On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, Daniel (ajax) Diniz wrote: http://bugs.python.org/issue809887 Improve pdb breakpoint feedback Why this one? John ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Issues to be closed: objections?
John J Lee wrote: On Mon, 16 Feb 2009, Daniel (ajax) Diniz wrote: http://bugs.python.org/issue809887 Improve pdb breakpoint feedback Why this one? Nice catch, this makes no sense. The patch even applies almost cleanly. I'll update it and set the others to pending, so further objections can be voiced. Thank for reviewing, John! Daniel ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
[Python-Dev] Issues to be closed: objections?
Hi, I've marked some issues (25 now) to close, mostly because: - there was no reply from OP, nor a clear justification for the issue; - there are messages explaining why the issue is invalid; - the OSes/versions of the report suggest the issue is currently invalid; However, I've been mistaken about the desirability of leaving an issue open a couple of times in last days. So, I'd really appreciate if someone could take a quick look at the issues below to avoid any undesirable closing. I'll also mark them as pending later today, and plan to wait until the weekend before closing. Any suggestion/criticism about this plan would be welcome too. Thanks everybody for all the support, helping, patience and enduring the spam! Daniel http://bugs.python.org/issue1231081 platform.processor() could be smarter http://bugs.python.org/issue1251921 Fail codecs.lookup() on 'mbcs' and 'tactis' http://bugs.python.org/issue1248119 pdb 'next' does not skip list comprehension http://bugs.python.org/issue1169633 Install fail code 2932 after fail to copy python_icon.exe http://bugs.python.org/issue100 csv reader barfs encountering quote when quote_none is set http://bugs.python.org/issue1044299 compile error with stlport http://bugs.python.org/issue1047540 Turtle.py hangs Idle http://bugs.python.org/issue995956 TclError with intel's hypertheading http://bugs.python.org/issue1001150 hotspot profiler does not work correctly on P4 CPUs with HT http://bugs.python.org/issue974635 Slice indexes passed to __getitem__ are wrapped http://bugs.python.org/issue974159 Starting a script in OSX within a specific folder http://bugs.python.org/issue949667 file write() method and non-blocking mode. http://bugs.python.org/issue815753 SCO_SV: many modules cannot be imported http://bugs.python.org/issue727732 getpath.c-generated prefix wrong for Tru64 scripts http://bugs.python.org/issue875654 add support for installations compiled for debugging http://bugs.python.org/issue872815 How to pass the proxy server use socket http://bugs.python.org/issue854918 Configurable SSL handshake http://bugs.python.org/issue835176 [2.3.2] bz2 test failure on AIX 4.3.2, Tru64 UNIX http://bugs.python.org/issue809887 Improve pdb breakpoint feedback http://bugs.python.org/issue780354 socket.makefile() isn't compatible with marshal/cPickle/etc http://bugs.python.org/issue775340 OSX 'freeze' bug http://bugs.python.org/issue4191 urlparse normalize URL path http://bugs.python.org/issue1682241 Problems with urllib2 read() http://bugs.python.org/issue1210326 comma separated cookie values http://bugs.python.org/issue5072 urllib.open sends full URL after GET command instead of local path ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Issues to be closed: objections?
On 2009-02-16 18:50, Daniel (ajax) Diniz wrote: Hi, I've marked some issues (25 now) to close, mostly because: - there was no reply from OP, nor a clear justification for the issue; - there are messages explaining why the issue is invalid; - the OSes/versions of the report suggest the issue is currently invalid; However, I've been mistaken about the desirability of leaving an issue open a couple of times in last days. So, I'd really appreciate if someone could take a quick look at the issues below to avoid any undesirable closing. I'll also mark them as pending later today, and plan to wait until the weekend before closing. Any suggestion/criticism about this plan would be welcome too. Thanks everybody for all the support, helping, patience and enduring the spam! Daniel http://bugs.python.org/issue1231081 platform.processor() could be smarter FYI: I've closed this one. -- Marc-Andre Lemburg eGenix.com Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Feb 16 2009) Python/Zope Consulting and Support ...http://www.egenix.com/ mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/ mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ...http://python.egenix.com/ ::: Try our new mxODBC.Connect Python Database Interface for free ! eGenix.com Software, Skills and Services GmbH Pastor-Loeh-Str.48 D-40764 Langenfeld, Germany. CEO Dipl.-Math. Marc-Andre Lemburg Registered at Amtsgericht Duesseldorf: HRB 46611 http://www.egenix.com/company/contact/ ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Issues to be closed: objections?
M.-A. Lemburg wrote: http://bugs.python.org/issue1231081 platform.processor() could be smarter Thanks, Marc-Andre! If anyone else feels like closing some of these issues, go ahead (no need to report back, I'll find it out later). My rather bureaucratic approach is just to avoid a possible trigger-happiness on my part :) Daniel ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Issues to be closed: objections?
Daniel (ajax) Diniz wrote: Hi, I've marked some issues (25 now) to close, mostly because: - there was no reply from OP, nor a clear justification for the issue; - there are messages explaining why the issue is invalid; - the OSes/versions of the report suggest the issue is currently invalid; However, I've been mistaken about the desirability of leaving an issue open a couple of times in last days. So, I'd really appreciate if someone could take a quick look at the issues below to avoid any undesirable closing. I'll also mark them as pending later today, and plan to wait until the weekend before closing. Any suggestion/criticism about this plan would be welcome too. I believe items changed from open to pending get closed automatically after a couple of weeks (this should be documented, I hope), so that there is no need to revisit. Thanks everybody for all the support, helping, patience and enduring the spam! Daniel http://bugs.python.org/issue1231081 platform.processor() could be smarter http://bugs.python.org/issue1251921 Fail codecs.lookup() on 'mbcs' and 'tactis' http://bugs.python.org/issue1248119 pdb 'next' does not skip list comprehension http://bugs.python.org/issue1169633 Install fail code 2932 after fail to copy python_icon.exe http://bugs.python.org/issue100 csv reader barfs encountering quote when quote_none is set http://bugs.python.org/issue1044299 compile error with stlport http://bugs.python.org/issue1047540 Turtle.py hangs Idle http://bugs.python.org/issue995956 TclError with intel's hypertheading http://bugs.python.org/issue1001150 hotspot profiler does not work correctly on P4 CPUs with HT http://bugs.python.org/issue974635 Slice indexes passed to __getitem__ are wrapped http://bugs.python.org/issue974159 Starting a script in OSX within a specific folder http://bugs.python.org/issue949667 file write() method and non-blocking mode. http://bugs.python.org/issue815753 SCO_SV: many modules cannot be imported http://bugs.python.org/issue727732 getpath.c-generated prefix wrong for Tru64 scripts http://bugs.python.org/issue875654 add support for installations compiled for debugging http://bugs.python.org/issue872815 How to pass the proxy server use socket http://bugs.python.org/issue854918 Configurable SSL handshake http://bugs.python.org/issue835176 [2.3.2] bz2 test failure on AIX 4.3.2, Tru64 UNIX http://bugs.python.org/issue809887 Improve pdb breakpoint feedback http://bugs.python.org/issue780354 socket.makefile() isn't compatible with marshal/cPickle/etc http://bugs.python.org/issue775340 OSX 'freeze' bug http://bugs.python.org/issue4191 urlparse normalize URL path http://bugs.python.org/issue1682241 Problems with urllib2 read() http://bugs.python.org/issue1210326 comma separated cookie values http://bugs.python.org/issue5072 urllib.open sends full URL after GET command instead of local path ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/python-python-dev%40m.gmane.org ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Issues to be closed: objections?
On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Terry Reedy tjre...@udel.edu wrote: Daniel (ajax) Diniz wrote: Hi, I've marked some issues (25 now) to close, mostly because: - there was no reply from OP, nor a clear justification for the issue; - there are messages explaining why the issue is invalid; - the OSes/versions of the report suggest the issue is currently invalid; However, I've been mistaken about the desirability of leaving an issue open a couple of times in last days. So, I'd really appreciate if someone could take a quick look at the issues below to avoid any undesirable closing. I'll also mark them as pending later today, and plan to wait until the weekend before closing. Any suggestion/criticism about this plan would be welcome too. I believe items changed from open to pending get closed automatically after a couple of weeks (this should be documented, I hope), so that there is no need to revisit. No, that feature hasn't yet been implemented. -- Regards, Benjamin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] Issues to be closed: objections?
Daniel (ajax) Diniz writes: M.-A. Lemburg wrote: http://bugs.python.org/issue1231081 platform.processor() could be smarter Thanks, Marc-Andre! If anyone else feels like closing some of these issues, go ahead (no need to report back, I'll find it out later). My rather bureaucratic approach is just to avoid a possible trigger-happiness on my part :) What you are doing is formal process. It only becomes bureaucracy when you try to make others do the same. ;-) Thank you very much for the work and letting us know about the process you follow! ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
