Hi, folks.

Since the previous discussion was suspended without consensus, I wrote
a new PEP for it. (Thank you Victor for reviewing it!)

This PEP looks very similar to PEP 623 "Remove wstr from Unicode",
but for encoder APIs, not for Unicode object APIs.

URL (not available yet): https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0624/

---

PEP: 624
Title: Remove Py_UNICODE encoder APIs
Author: Inada Naoki <songofaca...@gmail.com>
Status: Draft
Type: Standards Track
Content-Type: text/x-rst
Created: 06-Jul-2020
Python-Version: 3.11


Abstract
========

This PEP proposes to remove deprecated ``Py_UNICODE`` encoder APIs in
Python 3.11:

* ``PyUnicode_Encode()``
* ``PyUnicode_EncodeASCII()``
* ``PyUnicode_EncodeLatin1()``
* ``PyUnicode_EncodeUTF7()``
* ``PyUnicode_EncodeUTF8()``
* ``PyUnicode_EncodeUTF16()``
* ``PyUnicode_EncodeUTF32()``
* ``PyUnicode_EncodeUnicodeEscape()``
* ``PyUnicode_EncodeRawUnicodeEscape()``
* ``PyUnicode_EncodeCharmap()``
* ``PyUnicode_TranslateCharmap()``
* ``PyUnicode_EncodeDecimal()``
* ``PyUnicode_TransformDecimalToASCII()``

.. note::

   `PEP 623  <https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0623/>`_ propose to remove
   Unicode object APIs relating to ``Py_UNICODE``. On the other hand, this PEP
   is not relating to Unicode object. These PEPs are split because they have
   different motivation and need different discussion.


Motivation
==========

In general, reducing the number of APIs that have been deprecated for
a long time and have few users is a good idea for not only it
improves the maintainability of CPython, but it also helps API users
and other Python implementations.


Rationale
=========

Deprecated since Python 3.3
---------------------------

``Py_UNICODE`` and APIs using it are deprecated since Python 3.3.


Inefficient
-----------

All of these APIs are implemented using ``PyUnicode_FromWideChar``.
So these APIs are inefficient when user want to encode Unicode
object.


Not used widely
---------------

When searching from top 4000 PyPI packages [1]_, only pyodbc use
these APIs.

* ``PyUnicode_EncodeUTF8()``
* ``PyUnicode_EncodeUTF16()``

pyodbc uses these APIs to encode Unicode object into bytes object.
So it is easy to fix it. [2]_


Alternative APIs
================

There are alternative APIs to accept ``PyObject *unicode`` instead of
``Py_UNICODE *``. Users can migrate to them.


=========================================
==========================================
Deprecated API                            Alternative APIs
=========================================
==========================================
``PyUnicode_Encode()``                    ``PyUnicode_AsEncodedString()``
``PyUnicode_EncodeASCII()``               ``PyUnicode_AsASCIIString()`` \(1)
``PyUnicode_EncodeLatin1()``              ``PyUnicode_AsLatin1String()`` \(1)
``PyUnicode_EncodeUTF7()``                \(2)
``PyUnicode_EncodeUTF8()``                ``PyUnicode_AsUTF8String()`` \(1)
``PyUnicode_EncodeUTF16()``               ``PyUnicode_AsUTF16String()`` \(3)
``PyUnicode_EncodeUTF32()``               ``PyUnicode_AsUTF32String()`` \(3)
``PyUnicode_EncodeUnicodeEscape()``       ``PyUnicode_AsUnicodeEscapeString()``
``PyUnicode_EncodeRawUnicodeEscape()``
``PyUnicode_AsRawUnicodeEscapeString()``
``PyUnicode_EncodeCharmap()``             ``PyUnicode_AsCharmapString()`` \(1)
``PyUnicode_TranslateCharmap()``          ``PyUnicode_Translate()``
``PyUnicode_EncodeDecimal()``              \(4)
``PyUnicode_TransformDecimalToASCII()``    \(4)
=========================================
==========================================

Notes:

(1)
   ``const char *errors`` parameter is missing.

(2)
   There is no public alternative API. But user can use generic
   ``PyUnicode_AsEncodedString()`` instead.

(3)
   ``const char *errors, int byteorder`` parameters are missing.

(4)
   There is no direct replacement. But ``Py_UNICODE_TODECIMAL``
   can be used instead. CPython uses
   ``_PyUnicode_TransformDecimalAndSpaceToASCII`` for converting
   from Unicode to numbers instead.


Plan
====

Python 3.9
----------

Add ``Py_DEPRECATED(3.3)`` to following APIs. This change is committed
already [3]_. All other APIs have been marked ``Py_DEPRECATED(3.3)``
already.

* ``PyUnicode_EncodeDecimal()``
* ``PyUnicode_TransformDecimalToASCII()``.

Document all APIs as "will be removed in version 3.11".


Python 3.11
-----------

These APIs are removed.

* ``PyUnicode_Encode()``
* ``PyUnicode_EncodeASCII()``
* ``PyUnicode_EncodeLatin1()``
* ``PyUnicode_EncodeUTF7()``
* ``PyUnicode_EncodeUTF8()``
* ``PyUnicode_EncodeUTF16()``
* ``PyUnicode_EncodeUTF32()``
* ``PyUnicode_EncodeUnicodeEscape()``
* ``PyUnicode_EncodeRawUnicodeEscape()``
* ``PyUnicode_EncodeCharmap()``
* ``PyUnicode_TranslateCharmap()``
* ``PyUnicode_EncodeDecimal()``
* ``PyUnicode_TransformDecimalToASCII()``


Alternative ideas
=================

Instead of just removing deprecated APIs, we may be able to use thier
names with different signature.


Make some private APIs public
------------------------------

``PyUnicode_EncodeUTF7()`` doesn't have public alternative APIs.

Some APIs have alternative public APIs. But they are missing
``const char *errors`` or ``int byteorder`` parameters.

We can rename some private APIs and make them public to cover missing
APIs and parameters.

============================= ================================
 Rename to                     Rename from
============================= ================================
``PyUnicode_EncodeASCII()``    ``_PyUnicode_AsASCIIString()``
``PyUnicode_EncodeLatin1()``   ``_PyUnicode_AsLatin1String()``
``PyUnicode_EncodeUTF7()``     ``_PyUnicode_EncodeUTF7()``
``PyUnicode_EncodeUTF8()``     ``_PyUnicode_AsUTF8String()``
``PyUnicode_EncodeUTF16()``    ``_PyUnicode_EncodeUTF16()``
``PyUnicode_EncodeUTF32()``    ``_PyUnicode_EncodeUTF32()``
============================= ================================

Pros:

* We have more consistent API set.

Cons:

* We have more public APIs to maintain.
* Existing public APIs are enough for most use cases, and
  ``PyUnicode_AsEncodedString()`` can be used in other cases.


Replace ``Py_UNICODE*`` with ``Py_UCS4*``
-----------------------------------------

We can replace ``Py_UNICODE`` (typedef of ``wchar_t``) with
``Py_UCS4``. Since builtin codecs support UCS-4, we don't need to
convert ``Py_UCS4*`` string to Unicode object.


Pros:

* We have more consistent API set.
* User can encode UCS-4 string in C without creating Unicode object.

Cons:

* We have more public APIs to maintain.
* Applications which uses UTF-8 or UTF-32 can not use these APIs
  anyway.
* Other Python implementations may not have builtin codec for UCS-4.
* If we change the Unicode internal representation to UTF-8, we need
  to keep UCS-4 support only for these APIs.


Replace ``Py_UNICODE*`` with ``wchar_t*``
-----------------------------------------

We can replace ``Py_UNICODE`` to ``wchar_t``.

Pros:

* We have more consistent API set.
* Backward compatible.

Cons:

* We have more public APIs to maintain.
* They are inefficient on platforms ``wchar_t*`` is UTF-16. It is
  because built-in codecs supports only UCS-1, UCS-2, and UCS-4
  input.


Rejected ideas
==============

Using runtime warning
---------------------

These APIs doesn't release GIL for now. Emitting a warning from
such APIs is not safe. See this example.

.. code-block::

   PyObject *u = PyList_GET_ITEM(list, i);  // u is borrowed reference.
   PyObject *b = PyUnicode_EncodeUTF8(PyUnicode_AS_UNICODE(u),
           PyUnicode_GET_SIZE(u), NULL);
   // Assumes u is still living reference.
   PyObject *t = PyTuple_Pack(2, u, b);
   Py_DECREF(b);
   return t;

If we emit Python warning from ``PyUnicode_EncodeUTF8()``, warning
filters and other threads may change the ``list`` and ``u`` can be
a dangling reference after ``PyUnicode_EncodeUTF8()`` returned.

Additionally, since we are not changing behavior but removing C APIs,
runtime ``DeprecationWarning`` might not helpful for Python
developers. We should warn to extension developers instead.


Discussions
===========

* `Plan to remove Py_UNICODE APis except PEP 623
  
<https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/thread/S7KW2U6IGXZFBMGS6WSJB26NZIBW4OLE/#S7KW2U6IGXZFBMGS6WSJB26NZIBW4OLE>`_
* `bpo-41123: Remove Py_UNICODE APIs except PEP 623:
<https://bugs.python.org/issue41123>`_


References
==========

.. [1] Source package list chosen from top 4000 PyPI packages.
   
(https://github.com/methane/notes/blob/master/2020/wchar-cache/package_list.txt)

.. [2] pyodbc -- Don't use PyUnicode_Encode API #792
   (https://github.com/mkleehammer/pyodbc/pull/792)

.. [3] Uncomment Py_DEPRECATED for Py_UNICODE APIs (GH-21318)
   
(https://github.com/python/cpython/commit/9c3840870814493fed62e140cfa43c2883e12181)


Copyright
=========

This document has been placed in the public domain.

-- 
Inada Naoki  <songofaca...@gmail.com>
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/THXVM7FZVT56B7CPEDIYKJG6VMAYIEK5/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to