[Python-Dev] State of json in 2.7
It looks like simplejson 2.1.0 and 2.1.1 have been released: http://bob.pythonmac.org/archives/2010/03/10/simplejson-210/ http://bob.pythonmac.org/archives/2010/03/31/simplejson-211/ It looks like any changes that didn't come from the Python tree didn't go into the Python tree, either. I guess we can't put these changes into 2.7 anymore? How can we make this better next time? Cheers, Dirkjan ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] State of json in 2.7
2010/6/22 Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl: I guess we can't put these changes into 2.7 anymore? How can we make this better next time? Never have externally maintained packages. -- Regards, Benjamin ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] State of json in 2.7
[cc'ing Bob on his gmail address; didn't have any other address handy so I don't know if this will actually get to him] On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 09:54, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl wrote: It looks like simplejson 2.1.0 and 2.1.1 have been released: http://bob.pythonmac.org/archives/2010/03/10/simplejson-210/ http://bob.pythonmac.org/archives/2010/03/31/simplejson-211/ It looks like any changes that didn't come from the Python tree didn't go into the Python tree, either. Has anyone asked Bob why he did this? There might be a logical reason. -Brett ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] State of json in 2.7
On Tuesday, June 22, 2010, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote: [cc'ing Bob on his gmail address; didn't have any other address handy so I don't know if this will actually get to him] On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 09:54, Dirkjan Ochtman dirk...@ochtman.nl wrote: It looks like simplejson 2.1.0 and 2.1.1 have been released: http://bob.pythonmac.org/archives/2010/03/10/simplejson-210/ http://bob.pythonmac.org/archives/2010/03/31/simplejson-211/ It looks like any changes that didn't come from the Python tree didn't go into the Python tree, either. Has anyone asked Bob why he did this? There might be a logical reason. I've just been busy. It's not trivial to move patches from one to the other, so it's not something that has been easy for me to get around to actually doing. It seems that more often than not when I have had time to look at something, it didn't line up well with python's release schedule. (and speaking of busy I'm en route for a week long honeymoon so don't expect much else from me on this thread) -bob ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
Re: [Python-Dev] State of json in 2.7
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 12:56 PM, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote: Never have externally maintained packages. Seriously! I concur with this. Fortunately, it's not a real problem in this case. There's the (maintained) simplejson package, and the unmaintained json package. And simplejson works with older versions of Python, too, :-) -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr.fdrake at gmail.com A storm broke loose in my mind. --Albert Einstein ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
