Re: [Python-Dev] SPARC testers (and buildbot!) needed

2012-08-09 Thread Antoine Pitrou 

Le 09/08/2012 01:26, Floris Bruynooghe a écrit :


What Martin said; SPARC under Linux is probably a hobbyist platform.
Enterprise users of Solaris SPARC systems can still volunteer to provide and
maintain a buildslave.



Is http://wiki.python.org/moin/BuildBot the relevant documentation?


Yes, it is, but parts of it may be out of date. Please amend the 
instructions where necessary :-)



It still seems to refer to subversion, I presume that is no longer
needed and just mercurial will do?


True.


 I've set up a blank solaris 10
zone on a sparc T1000 with the OpenCSW toolchain (gcc 4.6.3) on our
server and installed buildslave.  According to the instructions this
is the point where I ask for a slave name and password.


Ok, I'll send you one in a couple of days (away from Paris right now).


Also, would it make sense to support OpenCSW more out of the box?
Currently we carry some patches for setup.py in order to pick up e.g.
sqlite from /opt/csw etc.  Would there be an interest in supporting
this?


I don't know, what is OpenCSW?
I think the answer also depends on the complexity of said patches.

Regards

Antoine.


___
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Python-Dev] SPARC testers (and buildbot!) needed

2012-08-09 Thread Martin v. Löwis 

Am 09.08.12 01:26, schrieb Floris Bruynooghe:

According to the instructions this
is the point where I ask for a slave name and password.


Sent in a private message.


Also, would it make sense to support OpenCSW more out of the box?
Currently we carry some patches for setup.py in order to pick up e.g.
sqlite from /opt/csw etc.  Would there be an interest in supporting
this?


If all that needs to be done is to add /opt/csw into search lists
where a search list already exists, I see no problem doing so - except
that this could be considered a new feature, so it might be only
possible to do it for 3.4.

If the patches are more involved, we would have to consider them
on a case-by-case basis.

Regards,
Martin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Python-Dev] python 3.3 b2

2012-08-09 Thread Eli Bendersky 
> As I've explained on python-committers, it's currently on hold pending
> the resolution of some importlib issues as well as a bug with the
> cross-compiling code.  I won't issue a concrete date, but I expect the
> release to be made some time before next Sunday.
>

The release dates on python.org aren't up-to-date. Could you update them
with the latest estimate(s). It doesn't have to be precise, but surely
there will be no RC2 release 3 days from now.

Eli
___
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Python-Dev] SPARC testers (and buildbot!) needed

2012-08-09 Thread Floris Bruynooghe 
On 9 August 2012 08:22, "Martin v. Löwis"  wrote:
> Am 09.08.12 01:26, schrieb Floris Bruynooghe:
>
>> According to the instructions this
>> is the point where I ask for a slave name and password.
>
>
> Sent in a private message.

Thanks, it seems to be working fine.  I triggered a build for 27 and
3.x.  I'm assuming other builds will just be triggered automatically
when needed from now on?

>> Also, would it make sense to support OpenCSW more out of the box?
>> Currently we carry some patches for setup.py in order to pick up e.g.
>> sqlite from /opt/csw etc.  Would there be an interest in supporting
>> this?
>
> If all that needs to be done is to add /opt/csw into search lists
> where a search list already exists, I see no problem doing so - except
> that this could be considered a new feature, so it might be only
> possible to do it for 3.4.

It is for 2.x, setup.py seems to have changed substantially in 3.x and
I haven't built that yet with OpenCSW but I presume I just need to
find the right place there too.  I'll open an issue for it instead of
discussing it here.


Regards,
Floris
___
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Python-Dev] SPARC testers (and buildbot!) needed

2012-08-09 Thread Floris Bruynooghe 
On 9 August 2012 08:11, Antoine Pitrou  wrote:
> Le 09/08/2012 01:26, Floris Bruynooghe a écrit :
>> Also, would it make sense to support OpenCSW more out of the box?
>> Currently we carry some patches for setup.py in order to pick up e.g.
>> sqlite from /opt/csw etc.  Would there be an interest in supporting
>> this?
>
> I don't know, what is OpenCSW?
> I think the answer also depends on the complexity of said patches.

OpenCSW is a community effort (CSW == Community SoftWare) to build a
repository of GNU/Linux userland binaries for Solaris.  It makes
package management as simple as on GNU/Linux, e.g.: "pkgutil --install
wget gcc4core libsqlite3_dev" which would otherwise be a very long and
laborious exercise.  It is very well maintained and I consider it a
must for any Solaris box which isn't tightly locked down.

As said in my other mail the patches are rather trivial but I will
open an issue to discuss there.

Regards,
Floris
___
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Python-Dev] SPARC testers (and buildbot!) needed

2012-08-09 Thread Floris Bruynooghe 
Hi,

On 8 August 2012 11:30, Stefan Krah  wrote:
> Could someone with access to a SPARC machine (perhaps with a modern version
> of Debian-sparc) grab a clone from http://hg.python.org/cpython/ and run
> the test suite?

One more thing that might be interesting, the OpenCSW project provides
access to their build farm to upstream maintainers.  They say
various/all versions of solaris are available and compilers etc are
already setup, but I have never tried this out.  In case someone is
interested in this, see
http://www.opencsw.org/extend-it/signup/to-upstream-maintainers/

Regards,
Floris
___
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] peps: 3.3 schedule update.

2012-08-09 Thread Eli Bendersky 
Awesome, thanks!

On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 9:47 PM, georg.brandl wrote:

> http://hg.python.org/peps/rev/fdf8b99178c4
> changeset:   4497:fdf8b99178c4
> user:Georg Brandl 
> date:Thu Aug 09 20:48:06 2012 +0200
> summary:
>   3.3 schedule update.
>
> files:
>   pep-0398.txt |  8 
>   1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
>
> diff --git a/pep-0398.txt b/pep-0398.txt
> --- a/pep-0398.txt
> +++ b/pep-0398.txt
> @@ -42,10 +42,10 @@
>
>  (No new features beyond this point.)
>
> -- 3.3.0 beta 2: July 21, 2012
> -- 3.3.0 candidate 1: August 4, 2012
> -- 3.3.0 candidate 2: August 18, 2012
> -- 3.3.0 final: September 1, 2012
> +- 3.3.0 beta 2: August 11, 2012
> +- 3.3.0 candidate 1: August 25, 2012
> +- 3.3.0 candidate 2: September 8, 2012
> +- 3.3.0 final: September 22, 2012
>
>  .. don't forget to update final date above as well
>
>
> --
> Repository URL: http://hg.python.org/peps
>
> ___
> Python-checkins mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-checkins
>
>
___
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Python-Dev] SPARC testers (and buildbot!) needed

2012-08-09 Thread Martin v. Löwis 

Thanks, it seems to be working fine.  I triggered a build for 27 and
3.x.  I'm assuming other builds will just be triggered automatically
when needed from now on?


Indeed; you have probably seen it happening in the waterfall already.

Thanks for providing that slave.

Regards,
Martin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Python-Dev] python 3.3 b2

2012-08-09 Thread Georg Brandl 

On 09.08.2012 10:48, Eli Bendersky wrote:


As I've explained on python-committers, it's currently on hold pending
the resolution of some importlib issues as well as a bug with the
cross-compiling code.  I won't issue a concrete date, but I expect the
release to be made some time before next Sunday.


The release dates on python.org  aren't up-to-date. Could you
update them with the latest estimate(s). It doesn't have to be precise, but
surely there will be no RC2 release 3 days from now.


Now they are up to date again.

Georg

___
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Python-Dev] SPARC testers (and buildbot!) needed

2012-08-09 Thread Martin v. Löwis 

Sent in a private message.


Thanks, it seems to be working fine.


Actually, there appears to be a glitch in the network setup: it appears
that connections to localhost are not possible in your zone. The tests
fail with an assertion

self.assertEqual(cm.exception.errno, errno.ECONNREFUSED)
AssertionError: 128 != 146

where 128 is ENETUNREACH. It would be good if localhost was reachable
on a build slave.

Also, if you haven't done so, please make sure that the build slave
restarts when the zone or the machine is restarted. Don't worry that
restarting will abort builds in progress - that happens from time
to time on any slave.

Regards,
Martin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com