Re: Django packages - proposed name changes

2012-01-24 Thread Matthias Runge
On 18/01/12 14:47, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:

>> 
> 
> Well, if I understand it correctly, the Python packaging guidelines
> say, that the Python 2 modules should be named python-* and Python
> 3 modules python3-*, so I would go with that (although I agree that
> it is a mess :) ).
> 

Ok, I just opened a new review request for python-django-debug-toolbar
instead of django-debug-toolbar.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=784239

Right?
-- 
Matthias Runge 
   
___
python-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/python-devel

Re: Django packages - proposed name changes

2012-01-24 Thread Frank Murphy

On 18/01/12 13:47, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:



Well, if I understand it correctly, the Python packaging guidelines say, that 
the Python 2 modules should be named python-* and Python 3 modules python3-*,


Can the python sig, not ask that python2 is python2
and python3 be as it is.
Then when python4 comes along call it python4.

Then ask for changes to be approved, for say F18\19?
and rebuild\obsolete as necessary.

--
Regards,

Frank Murphy
UTF_8 Encoded
___
python-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/python-devel