- Original Message -
> Greetings everyone, we had a productive session at flock and actually
> covered everything that was in my email message about a potential agenda.
> Here's the notes:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Toshio/Flock2013_Python_Guidelines
>
Thanks for posting this, Toshio. Few comments:
- The wheel proposal seems nice, although we should probably also cover the
case where upstream _only_ distributes wheel and not tarball (shouldn't be a
big deal).
- Shebang lines - So, it seems that we should both check the pip shebang line
and point %{__python} to %{__python2}, right?
- Naming of Python modules - this section is a bit confusing for me. What is
the outcome/which way does it suggest to use? (I'm personally in favour of SRPM
python-setuptools and RPMS python{2,3}-setuptools - with python2-setuptools
possibly having "Provides: python-setuptools").
> Note that we now need to:
>
> 1) Turn the notes into a guideline draft for the FPC
> 2) discuss some of the issues more broadly (here and in the packaging
>mailing list).
> 3) change some of the conclusions we had at flock due to that
>discussion. For instance, I discussed the pypy idea we had at flock
>(symlinking the purelib site-packages into pypy's site-packages) with one
>of the upstream pypy developers and he didn't feel it was a good idea.
>With that feedback, I think we want to go back to the drawing board with
>that one.
>
> -Toshio
--
Regards,
Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda.
___
python-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/python-devel
