[issue24132] Direct sub-classing of pathlib.Path
Christophe BAL <projet...@gmail.com> added the comment: Hello. What about AbstractPath instead of _PurePath ? Le 28/03/2018 à 02:30, qb-cea a écrit : > qb-cea <quentin.bou...@cea.fr> added the comment: > > Hi all, > > I made a pull request proposing a fix for this issue. There is still quite a > lot to be done: > - I exposed some variables (and probably methods too) that used to be > hidden; > - I did not update the documentation; > - I did not add a proper test. > > I will try to fix those by the end of the week. > > The patch mainly consists of two things: > - having Path (resp. PurePath) be a variable pointing at either > (Pure)PosixPath or (Pure)WindowsPath, depending on the platform (like Kevin > Norris suggested); > - introducing two new abstract classes _PurePath and ConcretePath from > which PurePosixPath, PureWindowsPath and PosixPath, WindowsPath classes > inherit; > - removing the _Flavor classes, and redistributing their method to > platform-specific classes. > > Ideally I would like _PurePath to become a public class, but I could not come > up with a proper name. Any feedback is more than welcome =] > > -- > > ___ > Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> > <https://bugs.python.org/issue24132> > ___ -- ___ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue24132> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24132] Direct sub-classing of pathlib.Path
Christophe BAL <projet...@gmail.com> added the comment: Mistyping : /search for class PPath/ with two P. Le 08/11/2017 à 13:59, Christophe BAL a écrit : > Christophe BAL <projet...@gmail.com> added the comment: > > For the moment, you can take a look at this little script that acheives > subclassing of Path : > https://github.com/bc-python/mistool/blob/master/mistool/os_use.py > (search for class Path). > > Le 08/11/2017 à 09:55, Paul Moore a écrit : >> Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> added the comment: >> >> @elguavas the problem is, no-one has proposed a patch. There's not likely to >> be much movement on this until someone provides one. >> >> -- >> >> ___ >> Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> >> <https://bugs.python.org/issue24132> >> ___ > -- > > ___ > Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> > <https://bugs.python.org/issue24132> > ___ -- ___ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue24132> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24132] Direct sub-classing of pathlib.Path
Christophe BAL <projet...@gmail.com> added the comment: For the moment, you can take a look at this little script that acheives subclassing of Path : https://github.com/bc-python/mistool/blob/master/mistool/os_use.py (search for class Path). Le 08/11/2017 à 09:55, Paul Moore a écrit : > Paul Moore <p.f.mo...@gmail.com> added the comment: > > @elguavas the problem is, no-one has proposed a patch. There's not likely to > be much movement on this until someone provides one. > > -- > > ___ > Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> > <https://bugs.python.org/issue24132> > ___ -- ___ Python tracker <rep...@bugs.python.org> <https://bugs.python.org/issue24132> ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24132] Direct sub-classing of pathlib.Path
Changes by Christophe BAL projet...@gmail.com: -- title: Direct sub-classing of pathless.Path - Direct sub-classing of pathlib.Path ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24132 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24132] Direct sub-classing of pathlib.Path
Christophe BAL added the comment: Hello. I will give a real example in 5 hours after my job. I will try tomorrow a solution to ease the subclassing using another dedicazted class PathPlus, sorry for the name. The idea would be to use this new class for customization, and also to define WindowsPath and PosixPath sub-classing this new class. By default PathPlus would be an empty class. I do not know if this works well. Maybe my idea is a bad one. *Christophe BAL* *Enseignant de mathématiques en Lycée **et développeur Python amateur* *---* *French math teacher in a Lycée **and **Python **amateur developer* 2015-05-06 13:05 GMT+02:00 Antoine Pitrou rep...@bugs.python.org: Antoine Pitrou added the comment: The Path classes were not designed to be subclassable by the user. I'm not against making subclassing easier, but someone will have to propose a viable approach for that. -- versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24132 ___ -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24132 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24132] Direct sub-classing of pathlib.Path
Christophe BAL added the comment: Here are for example two extra methods that I have implemented. def __sub__(cls, path): This magic method allows to use ``onepath - anotherpath`` instead of the long version ``onepath.relative_to(anotherpath)`` given by ``pathlib.Path``. return cls.relative_to(path) def _ppath_common_with(cls, paths): This method returns the path of the smaller common folder of the current path and at least one paths. python:: from mistool import os_use path = os_use.PPath(/Users/projects/source/doc) path_1 = os_use.PPath(/Users/projects/README) path_2 = os_use.PPath(/Users/projects/source/misTool/os_use.py) print(path.common_with((path_1, path_2))) if not isinstance(paths, (list, tuple)): paths = [paths] commonparts = list(cls.parts) for onepath in paths: i = 0 for common, actual in zip(commonparts, onepath.parts): if common == actual: i += 1 else: break commonparts = commonparts[:i] if not commonparts: break commonpath = pathlib.Path() for part in commonparts: commonpath /= part return commonpath *Christophe BAL* *Enseignant de mathématiques en Lycée **et développeur Python amateur* *---* *French math teacher in a Lycée **and **Python **amateur developer* 2015-05-06 14:13 GMT+02:00 Christophe BAL rep...@bugs.python.org: Christophe BAL added the comment: Hello. I will give a real example in 5 hours after my job. I will try tomorrow a solution to ease the subclassing using another dedicazted class PathPlus, sorry for the name. The idea would be to use this new class for customization, and also to define WindowsPath and PosixPath sub-classing this new class. By default PathPlus would be an empty class. I do not know if this works well. Maybe my idea is a bad one. *Christophe BAL* *Enseignant de mathématiques en Lycée **et développeur Python amateur* *---* *French math teacher in a Lycée **and **Python **amateur developer* 2015-05-06 13:05 GMT+02:00 Antoine Pitrou rep...@bugs.python.org: Antoine Pitrou added the comment: The Path classes were not designed to be subclassable by the user. I'm not against making subclassing easier, but someone will have to propose a viable approach for that. -- versions: +Python 3.5 -Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24132 ___ -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24132 ___ -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24132 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24132] Direct sub-classing of pathlib.Path
Christophe BAL added the comment: Are you the author of path lib ? *Christophe BAL* *Enseignant de mathématiques en Lycée **et développeur Python amateur* *---* *French math teacher in a Lycée **and **Python **amateur developer* 2015-05-06 21:01 GMT+02:00 Paul Moore rep...@bugs.python.org: Paul Moore added the comment: I have no problem with that - it's a style choice certainly. As I said, I'd like to see simpler subclassing of pathlib objects. I just think it'll be quite hard to do (given the complexities of classes for Windows/Unix as well as pure and concrete paths). So if it's just about examples like this, I personally would take the easier route and just go with standalone functions. If someone else felt strongly enough to design and implement a subclassing solution, that's fine though. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24132 ___ -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24132 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24132] Direct sub-classing of pathlib.Path
Christophe BAL added the comment: I don't agree with you. I prefer to add new functionalities to the paths I use. This is the power of OOP. It is easier and cleaner to use *mypath.common_with(otherpath)* than *common_with(**mypath, **other path)* . Python is highly OOP, so you can't say *don't use subclassing in your case*. As a user, I should have the possibility to use the method I want. Another example is the use of *onepath - anotherpath* instead of *onepath.relative_to(**another path)* . That's the power of the magic method to add this kind of feature. *Christophe BAL* *Enseignant de mathématiques en Lycée **et développeur Python amateur* *---* *French math teacher in a Lycée **and **Python **amateur developer* 2015-05-06 20:21 GMT+02:00 Paul Moore rep...@bugs.python.org: Paul Moore added the comment: For that type of function, I'd suggest you use a standalone function rather than subclassing and methods or operator overloading. You don't gain enough to be worth the complexity of having to subclass path objects. And duck typing means that your function works for any subclass of (Pure)Path without change. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24132 ___ -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24132 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24132] Direct sub-classing of pathlib.Path
Christophe BAL added the comment: OK. I will try to find a way to achieve an easier and cleaner way to sub class pathlib.Path and co. What is the good way to propose a patch ? *Christophe BAL* *Enseignant de mathématiques en Lycée **et développeur Python amateur* *---* *French math teacher in a Lycée **and **Python **amateur developer* 2015-05-06 21:09 GMT+02:00 Paul Moore rep...@bugs.python.org: Paul Moore added the comment: Are you the author of path lib ? Nope, that's Antoine. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24132 ___ -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24132 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24132] Direct sub-classing of pathless.Path
New submission from Christophe BAL: Hello. I have noticed a problem with the following code. from pathlib import Path class PPath(Path): def __init__(self, *args, **kwargs): super().__init__(*args, **kwargs) test = PPath(dir, test.txt) This gives the following error message. Traceback (most recent call last): File /Users/projetmbc/test.py, line 14, in module test = PPath(dir, test.txt) File /anaconda/lib/python3.4/pathlib.py, line 907, in __new__ self = cls._from_parts(args, init=False) File /anaconda/lib/python3.4/pathlib.py, line 589, in _from_parts drv, root, parts = self._parse_args(args) File /anaconda/lib/python3.4/pathlib.py, line 582, in _parse_args return cls._flavour.parse_parts(parts) AttributeError: type object 'PPath' has no attribute '_flavour' This breaks the sub-classing from Python point of view. There is an ugly hack to sub-class Path but it's a bit unpythonic. -- messages: 242643 nosy: projetmbc priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Direct sub-classing of pathless.Path type: behavior versions: Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24132 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24108] fnmatch.translate('*.txt') fails
Christophe BAL added the comment: Ok. But in that case, the official documentation should be updated because it saids that string regex is *'.*\\.txt\\Z(?ms)'* and not *'.*\\.txt$'*. On the other hand, using this writing seems a bit strange. The 2nd one should do the job. *Christophe BAL* *Enseignant de mathématiques en Lycée **et développeur Python amateur* *---* *French math teacher in a Lycée **and **Python **amateur developer* 2015-05-01 21:42 GMT+02:00 Merlijn van Deen rep...@bugs.python.org: Merlijn van Deen added the comment: As far as I can see, the regex is correct: \Z Matches only at the end of the string. (?iLmsux) The group matches the empty string; the letters set the corresponding flags: (...) - re.M (multi-line), - re.S (dot matches all) See https://docs.python.org/3.4/library/re.html Do you have an example where the regex does not match a file it should match (or matches a file it shouldn't)? -- nosy: +valhallasw ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24108 ___ -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24108 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24108] fnmatch.translate('*.txt') fails
New submission from Christophe BAL: Hello. I find the following bug on Python 3.4. import fnmatch, re regex = fnmatch.translate('*.txt') regex '.*\\.txt\\Z(?ms)' The string regex should be '.*\\.txt$'. -- components: asyncio messages: 242346 nosy: gvanrossum, haypo, projetmbc, yselivanov priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: fnmatch.translate('*.txt') fails versions: Python 3.4 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24108 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24108] fnmatch.translate('*.txt') fails
Christophe BAL added the comment: Oups, sorry I want to say that you are totally RIGHT, and I am definitely WRONG. :-) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24108 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue24108] fnmatch.translate('*.txt') fails
Christophe BAL added the comment: You're totally wrong and I am wrong. There is still the tiny problem of the documentation. Thanks for all. *Christophe BAL* *Enseignant de mathématiques en Lycée **et développeur Python amateur* *---* *French math teacher in a Lycée **and **Python **amateur developer* 2015-05-01 22:16 GMT+02:00 Merlijn van Deen rep...@bugs.python.org: Merlijn van Deen added the comment: They are subtly different; the new regex also matches filenames with newlines, the old one doesn't (see Issue #6665 [1]). Patch (although crazily minor) attached. With some fuzz, it applies on everything from 2.6..default. [1] https://bugs.python.org/issue6665 -- assignee: - docs@python components: +Documentation -asyncio keywords: +patch nosy: +docs@python Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file39261/default.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24108 ___ -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue24108 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com