[issue17845] Clarify successful build message
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: Patch to modify setup.py comments on successful build -- keywords: +patch nosy: +Yogesh.Chaudhari Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30758/issue17845.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17845 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17953] sys.modules cannot be reassigned
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: You are most welcome Brett. I am just starting to contribute with this doc fix. Didn't think a small detail in it will generate such a long debate in the python-committers mailing list. Is there a plan in action for 'fixing' Misc/NEWS. I now realize that this change is too small to warrant an entry there, however, as someone new to the list, I simply followed http://docs.python.org/devguide/patch.html. Doing a make patchcheck warns about no changes to Misc/NEWS. IMHO it would be great if this tool can look at the files changed (or maybe at-least just the directory, or even, simply number of lines modified) and decide if an entry is required in Misc/News. Of-course this is from my perspective. I would like to get your view on this and help about the solution if possible. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17953 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17953] sys.modules cannot be reassigned
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: That sounds good. I will open up an issue (if not for anything else other than to get more eyes on this issue) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17953 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18053] Add checks for Misc/NEWS in make patchcheck
New submission from Yogesh Chaudhari: Based on the threads about http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-committers/2013-May/002529.html and discussion on http://bugs.python.org/issue17953; It would be good to add some (very high level)checks inside patchcheck that will tell the user if Misc/NEWS needs to be updated for the patch created. As of now the patchcheck utility adds a notice to modify Misc/NEWS for every patch. IMO this notice should be based on some simple checks. eg: number of lines modified and/or directories changed (that might give a clue about ignoring minor changes in documentation and considering changes in Python core or major changes in Libs etc) based on which make patchcheck should generate warnings for changing Misc/NEWS. -- messages: 189942 nosy: Yogesh.Chaudhari priority: normal severity: normal status: open title: Add checks for Misc/NEWS in make patchcheck ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18053 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue18053] Add checks for Misc/NEWS in make patchcheck
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: I am not sure which component patchcheck corresponds to, so I have left that out and added people on nosy list in http://bugs.python.org/issue17953. If I have missed the concerned maintainer, kindly let me know. -- nosy: +brett.cannon, pitrou, r.david.murray, terry.reedy versions: +Python 2.7, Python 3.1, Python 3.2, Python 3.3, Python 3.4, Python 3.5 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue18053 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17953] sys.modules cannot be reassigned
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: Documentation added for sys.modules -- keywords: +patch nosy: +Yogesh.Chaudhari Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30305/issue17953.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17953 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17914] add os.cpu_count()
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: Minor modifications based on review comments. 1. Change mib array size to 2, 2. return value set to 0 consistently (in C code), and 3. removed IRIX #defines -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30282/issue17914-6.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17914 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17914] add os.cpu_count()
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: Typo fix -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30284/issue17914-7.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17914 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17914] add os.cpu_count()
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: @Stinner: 1. While I agree with your idea of what you have done in test_os, (particularly, for determining if platform is supported or not) there seems to be no reason(AFAIK) to have a shutil for cpu_count. I agree with neologox there. 2. Also I am not comfortable with the idea of having multiple 'implementations' of cpu_count. There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it. 3. The idea of returning 1 by default does not seem to serve a useful purpose. It should be left to the end-user to decide what needs to be done based on error/actual_value received from system. (+1 to Antoine and nedbat) For eg, a. Let's say someone works on scheduling and power managment modules. It is important to know that the platform does not support providing cpu_count() instead of giving 1. This will ensure that they don't go about erroneously setting wrong options for scheduler and/or overclocking the CPU too much(or too little). b. On the other hand if another user just wants to use a cpu_count number from a his application to determine the number of threads to spawn he can set th = cpu_count() or 1 (on a side note: *usually* for programs that are non IO intensive and require no/little synchronization it is best to spawn cpu_count() number of threads) These are just 2 examples to demonstrate that it must be the end-user who decides what to do with the proper_value or reasonable_error_value given by cpu_count() 4. +1 to Antoine on last comment ;-) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17914 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17962] Broken OpenSSL version in Windows builds
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: I would like to take a crack at it. Would it be possible(I mean permission wise)? How can I proceed? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17962 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9856] Change object.__format__(s) where s is non-empty to a TypeError
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: +1 to Terry for If its class does not override .__format__, then it seems that it should act the same as a direct object instance -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue9856 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17914] add os.cpu_count()
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: Modified patch based on further comments and review. 1. Removed *everything* from os.py 2. removed typecasting for ncpu where not required. 3. removed redundant comments -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30246/issue17914-5.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17914 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17962] Broken OpenSSL version in Windows builds
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: @Antoine and @Georg: You are right. There is nothing much to be done. The only difference is those of auto-generated files like Makefile and other config files created after running ./config script. This just needs a simple add/commit from the openssl site. It seems there is nothing else AFAICS -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17962 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17914] add os.cpu_count()
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: Based on the last 3 messages by Ned, Charles and Antoine, I keep thinking that arguments made by Charles are very valid ones and that it would be better to return 1. I say this (partly from the 'type' argument, but), mainly, *if* its known that the underlying libraries are returning 1 on failure. *If* that is the case I see no reason try to return None (which, btw, will never happen if none of the calls return non-positive values ever). -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17914 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17890] argparse: mutually exclusive groups full of suppressed args can cause AssertionErrors
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: @Terry: Thanks for the info. I seem to have the elusive * after my username now. I am not sure how this works, but can you review/test/apply the patch now? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17890 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17940] extra code in argparse.py
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: I guess that was simple enough. I am new to this issue tracker for Cpython. How will the patch review/commit proceed? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17940 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17962] Broken OpenSSL version in Windows builds
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: The following patch will make use of 1.0.1e version of OpenSSL -- keywords: +patch nosy: +Yogesh.Chaudhari Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30232/issue17962.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17962 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9856] Change object.__format__(s) where s is non-empty to a TypeError
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
@Eric:
when you say: If the type of the object really is object, then it can use
string formatting. It's only for non-objects that I want to add the error..
I am confused. Let me demonstrate what I'm thinking according to the statement
above.
First let us take a 'non-object':
integer=1
type(integer) != object
True
As of now it returns the following:
integer.__format__(s)
'1'
Which seems natural.
But after this patch should it return an error
Also now consider an object:
f = object()
type(f)
class 'object'
This will return the following after the patch as it does now which is:
f.__format__('')
'object object at 0xb75b7b48'
Does this mean that 'integer' should give an error, however, 'f' should give
something that appears messy?
I may be mistaken in my interpretation of the statement, so kindly let me know
if there is something else that I am not clearly understanding.
--
nosy: +Yogesh.Chaudhari
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9856
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9856] Change object.__format__(s) where s is non-empty to a TypeError
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
Please replace
integer.__format__(s)
with
integer.__format__('')
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9856
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17914] add os.cpu_count()
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: @STINNER: I don't understand. Where exactly should the patch handle this? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17914 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17914] add os.cpu_count()
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: Modified patch based on review by neologix -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30236/issue17914-4.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17914 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13461] Error on test_issue_1395_5 with Python 2.7 and VS2010
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: This patch should work for 2.7 branch -- hgrepos: +191 keywords: +patch nosy: +Yogesh.Chaudhari Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30238/issue13461-27.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13461 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13461] Error on test_issue_1395_5 with Python 2.7 and VS2010
Changes by Yogesh Chaudhari mr.yog...@gmail.com: -- hgrepos: -191 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13461 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue13461] Error on test_issue_1395_5 with Python 2.7 and VS2010
Changes by Yogesh Chaudhari mr.yog...@gmail.com: Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30239/issue13461-3x.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue13461 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17940] extra code in argparse.py
Changes by Yogesh Chaudhari mr.yog...@gmail.com: -- hgrepos: -190 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17940 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17890] argparse: mutually exclusive groups full of suppressed args can cause AssertionErrors
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: @terry and @paul: I have 2 argparse related patches, sitting idle for quiet sometime now. Can you suggest any more names who can take this forward? (I could not find anyone else related to argparse in http://docs.python.org/devguide/experts.html) -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17890 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue9856] Change object.__format__(s) where s is non-empty to a TypeError
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment:
It's this case that is currently an error, but it need not be:
format(object(), '1')
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
TypeError: non-empty format string passed to object.__format__
I believe that should continue to remain an error. Please note that this works
format(object(), '')
'object object at 0xb74fd688'
From what I can tell, specifying '1' or '2' or '100' makes no sense because
unlike string or int (and like list or tuple ) this 'number' does not
represent anything sensible.
This works fine as it should:
format('q', '5')
'q'
format(1, '5')
'1'
format(1, '05')
'1'
But this does not and IMHO *should* not 'work'
format([1,2,3], '5')
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
TypeError: non-empty format string passed to object.__format__
format((1,2,3), '5')
Traceback (most recent call last):
File stdin, line 1, in module
TypeError: non-empty format string passed to object.__format__
an object() CANNOT have specific behavior like str or int. You can of-course
argue as to what kind of error/exception/warning this may raise, but it does
not make any sense (AFAIK) to 'fix' this.
--
___
Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org
http://bugs.python.org/issue9856
___
___
Python-bugs-list mailing list
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12634] Random Remarks in class documentation
Changes by Yogesh Chaudhari mr.yog...@gmail.com: -- hgrepos: -188 ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12634 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17962] Broken OpenSSL version in Windows builds
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: I am not sure how http://www.openssl.org/source/openssl-1.0.1e.tar.gz can be provided to python svn. Doesn't that require svn credentials to check-out/add/check-in? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17962 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17940] extra code in argparse.py
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: Removed the duplicated code from argparse.py -- keywords: +patch nosy: +Yogesh.Chaudhari Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30214/issue17940.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17940 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17940] extra code in argparse.py
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: Remove extra code in argparse.py for 2.7 branch -- hgrepos: +190 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30215/issue17940-27.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17940 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17940] extra code in argparse.py
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: I have added a patch for default branch as well, because IMO the same issue exists in all branches -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17940 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17914] add os.cpu_count()
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: Based on the conversation and the particular inputs to the thread form neologix and ezio, I would like to submit this patch. It probably needs modification(s) as I am not sure what to do with the implementation that is already present in multiprocessing. This patch simply calls the os.cpu_count() from multiprocessing now and behaves as it would have previously. The test cases are also added to test_os similar to ones from multiprocessing. -- components: +2to3 (2.x to 3.x conversion tool) keywords: +patch nosy: +Yogesh.Chaudhari Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30217/issue17914.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17914 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17914] add os.cpu_count()
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: Appreciate everyone's feedback. I have modified the patch based on further messages in the thread. @Neologix modified posixmodule according to one in Trent's branch and used that for cpu_count(). Kindly suggest improvements/changes if any. @Ned: Thanks for the suggestions. I have applied them wherever applicable. However regarding And this I think will throw an exception in Python 3: `cpus = 1 or cpus == None`, because you can't compare None to 1. It does not throw any exceptions as of now. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30220/issue17914-1.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17914 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17914] add os.cpu_count()
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: @Serhiy Sorry, I missed your comments in the thread. I have made 2 changes and ignored the cpu_count() returning 0, because it returns -1 on failure, else give the number of CPUs. Also the test_os, checks for 0 return if that was to e the case. -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30223/issue17914-2.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17914 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17914] add os.cpu_count()
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: Returning None from C code sounds reasonable to me. Anyone else wants to pitch in with suggestions for/against this? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17914 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17914] add os.cpu_count()
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: Modified patch to return None from C code -- Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30226/issue17914-3.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17914 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17914] add os.cpu_count()
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: @Ned: if cpus is None, then this will raise an exception in Python 3: `cpus = 1 or cpus == None` I understand that cpus = INTEGER will raise an exception and have already modified the condition to remove that kind of check. I was merely stating that equality checks do not raise exception. eg: cpus = None cpus == 1 False cpus == None True Thanks for pointing me out in the right direction to remove those invalid checks and showing the use of proper alternatives at other places in the patch -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17914 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12634] Random Remarks in class documentation
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: Similar changes for 2.7 branch -- hgrepos: +188 Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30135/issue12634-27.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12634 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue12634] Random Remarks in class documentation
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: Based on Teery's comments, this patch makes the changes to the random remarks section of the class documentation -- keywords: +patch nosy: +Yogesh.Chaudhari Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30134/issue12634.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue12634 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17890] argparse: mutually exclusive groups full of suppressed args can cause AssertionErrors
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: I am not sure if I am missing something. I had filled out the form at http://www.python.org/psf/contrib/contrib-form/ on the day I submitted the patch and even got back an email from Ewa Jodlowska. However, I don't see any * after my name. I submitted the same form to contribut...@python.org and shot a mail to python-dev mailing list but there is no change. Any suggestions? -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17890 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17890] argparse: mutually exclusive groups full of suppressed args can cause AssertionErrors
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: A user generated line with multiple spaces may be essential if we are getting the usage data (particularly from) a csv file (that may have random spaces in certain fields) or some other form of stored or auto-generated data. -- ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17890 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17871] Wrong signature of TextTestRunner's init function
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: The changes in Docs/library/unittest.rst have been made to reflect proper arguments from Lib/unittest/runner.py -- keywords: +patch nosy: +Yogesh.Chaudhari Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30106/mywork.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17871 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17890] argparse: mutually exclusive groups full of suppressed args can cause AssertionErrors
Changes by Yogesh Chaudhari mr.yog...@gmail.com: -- keywords: +patch Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30108/7691d1d4b955.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17890 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17890] argparse: mutually exclusive groups full of suppressed args can cause AssertionErrors
Yogesh Chaudhari added the comment: Made similar required changes for version 2.7 -- nosy: +Yogesh.Chaudhari Added file: http://bugs.python.org/file30110/Issue17890-27.patch ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17890 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
[issue17890] argparse: mutually exclusive groups full of suppressed args can cause AssertionErrors
Changes by Yogesh Chaudhari mr.yog...@gmail.com: Removed file: http://bugs.python.org/file30108/7691d1d4b955.diff ___ Python tracker rep...@bugs.python.org http://bugs.python.org/issue17890 ___ ___ Python-bugs-list mailing list Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-bugs-list/archive%40mail-archive.com
