Re: Input() in Python3

2011-04-25 Thread Mel
Westley Martínez wrote:

 On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:08:20AM -0400, Mel wrote:
[ ... ]
 But sys.exit() doesn't return a string.  My fave is
 
 Python 2.6.5 (r265:79063, Apr 16 2010, 13:09:56)
 [GCC 4.4.3] on linux2
 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
  import sys
  a = int (input ('enter a number '))
 enter a number sys.setrecursionlimit(1)
 Exception RuntimeError: 'maximum recursion depth exceeded while calling a
 Python object' in type 'exceptions.RuntimeError' ignored
[ ... ]

 What?

I guess sys.setrecursionlimit was meant to be called with a large number.  
Calling it with a small one roadblocks the interpreter.  Luckily, there can 
be just enough room to call setrecursionlimit again with something 
reasonable to get it all back.  Not enough room for `eval 
(sys.setrecursionlimit (2000)`, though.

Mel.

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Input() in Python3

2011-04-25 Thread Jayme Proni Filho
Hey!

Try to use like this: http://sprunge.us/RcYb

change values for understanding code.


Good ideas guys!
---
Jayme Proni Filho
Skype: jaymeproni
Twitter: @jaymeproni
Phone: +55 - 17 - 3631 - 6576
Mobile: +55 - 17 - 9605 - 3560
e-Mail: jaymeproni at yahoo dot com dot br
---
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Input() in Python3

2011-04-23 Thread Westley Martínez
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 10:08:20AM -0400, Mel wrote:
 Westley Martínez wrote:
  On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 04:49:19PM +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
 
  U NO. NO NO NO. What if someone enters os.exit() as their
  number? You shouldn't eval() unchecked user input!
  
  Chris Angelico
  
  Right, there's no way to check you're getting a number, however using:
  
  a = int(input('enter a number  ')) # use float() for floats
  
  will raise an exception if it can't convert the string.
 
 But sys.exit() doesn't return a string.  My fave is
 
 Python 2.6.5 (r265:79063, Apr 16 2010, 13:09:56) 
 [GCC 4.4.3] on linux2
 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
  import sys
  a = int (input ('enter a number '))
 enter a number sys.setrecursionlimit(1)
 Exception RuntimeError: 'maximum recursion depth exceeded while calling a 
 Python object' in type 'exceptions.RuntimeError' ignored
 Exception RuntimeError: 'maximum recursion depth exceeded while calling a 
 Python object' in type 'exceptions.RuntimeError' ignored
 Error in sys.excepthook:
 RuntimeError: maximum recursion depth exceeded
 
 Original exception was:
 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File stdin, line 1, in module
 RuntimeError: maximum recursion depth exceeded while calling a Python object
  int (0)
 Exception RuntimeError: 'maximum recursion depth exceeded while calling a 
 Python object' in type 'exceptions.RuntimeError' ignored
 Exception RuntimeError: 'maximum recursion depth exceeded while calling a 
 Python object' in type 'exceptions.RuntimeError' ignored
 Error in sys.excepthook:
 RuntimeError: maximum recursion depth exceeded
 
 Original exception was:
 Traceback (most recent call last):
   File stdin, line 1, in module
 RuntimeError: maximum recursion depth exceeded while calling a Python object
  
 
 
   Mel.
 

What?
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Input() in Python3

2011-04-23 Thread harrismh777

Chris Rebert wrote:

Well, it pretty much*was*  totally removed; it was prone to misuse and
had very few legitimate uses. It's just that raw_input() also got
renamed simultaneously.
What were you using it for? There are often much better alternatives.


For the purpose pretty much described in PEP 3111... education.

Teaching new programmers  input, control, arithmetic, logic, and output 
 works best with simple built-ins. IMHO


I want to teach young folks how to get stuff into their simple programs, 
crank on them a bit, and spit out the results... without having to teach 
them imports, libraries, etc.


Keep in mind that some of this stuff is very simple (say trivial) and is 
being used to provide a way to get the data 'they are expecting' into 
the program easily, with a prompt.


This was the great concept in BASIC, and REXX, and others.  The C 
language broke with this concept by declaring that the language does not 
provide I/O   ... only in the standard library, as functions!


The beauty of Python (as I've noted before) is that it can be used in an 
uber-sophisticated way... AND it can also be taught to children!  Having 
thought a little more about that, I suppose that I agree that input() 
should return a raw string. After all, the students aren't really 
entering numbers are they?? They are entering strings of characters 
that need to be converted into numbers... easily explained... I was just 
surprised to find that issue so hotly debated... again, why remove 
something that works.


The wisdom was to use a system call instead, right?



kind regards,

m harris
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Input() in Python3

2011-04-22 Thread harrismh777
My interactive scripts are giving errors on the input(). I discovered 
another fairly significant change in Python3, as discussed in PEP 3111.


I was a little flabbergasted to discover that input() was proposed to be 
removed 'totally' from 3000. Of course I agree with PEP 3111 and am 
thankful that input() is still a built-in.  doh.


The problem is that the behavior was significantly changed, again, 
causing existing code to break un-necessarily. So, input() used to be 
equivalent to:


   eval(raw_input(prompt)) -- value


now we get this for input():


   raw_input(prompt) -- string


I'm not whining or anything, just wondering why? Could someone enlighten 
me please?


Anyway, it looks like the best fix for 2.x -- 3.x  code changes:

change:a = input(enter a number  )

to:a = eval(input(enter a number  ))


Again, this is just another example where leaving the advertised 
interface alone would have made more sense... unless of course, I'm 
missing something important here.


kind regards,
m harris

--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Input() in Python3

2011-04-22 Thread Chris Angelico
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 4:22 PM, harrismh777 harrismh...@charter.net wrote:
 now we get this for input():

   raw_input(prompt) -- string

I would have to say that the 2.x behaviour of input() is a mistake
that's being corrected in 3.x. With a simple name like input(), it
should do something simple and straightforward - not eval() the
expression.

 to:        a = eval(input(enter a number  ))

U NO. NO NO NO. What if someone enters os.exit() as their
number? You shouldn't eval() unchecked user input!

Chris Angelico
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Input() in Python3

2011-04-22 Thread Chris Angelico
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
 U NO. NO NO NO. What if someone enters os.exit() as their
 number? You shouldn't eval() unchecked user input!

Whoops, I meant sys.exit() - but you probably knew that already.

ChrisA
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Input() in Python3

2011-04-22 Thread Chris Rebert
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 11:22 PM, harrismh777 harrismh...@charter.net wrote:
 My interactive scripts are giving errors on the input(). I discovered
 another fairly significant change in Python3, as discussed in PEP 3111.

 I was a little flabbergasted to discover that input() was proposed to be
 removed 'totally' from 3000. Of course I agree with PEP 3111 and am thankful
 that input() is still a built-in.  doh.

Well, it pretty much *was* totally removed; it was prone to misuse and
had very few legitimate uses. It's just that raw_input() also got
renamed simultaneously.
What were you using it for? There are often much better alternatives.

 The problem is that the behavior was significantly changed, again, causing
 existing code to break un-necessarily.

Python 3 has many unnecessary backwards-incompatible changes; the
Python devs have made this abundantly clear and one should be aware of
this before going into Python 3. And again, I don't think a behavior
change is the best way to conceptualize this, although from a user
perspective, there indeed isn't much difference between a behavior
change and a simultaneous removal and renaming.

 So, input() used to be equivalent to:

   eval(raw_input(prompt)) -- value


 now we get this for input():


   raw_input(prompt) -- string


 I'm not whining or anything, just wondering why? Could someone enlighten me
 please?

 Anyway, it looks like the best fix for 2.x -- 3.x  code changes:

 change:    a = input(enter a number  )

 to:        a = eval(input(enter a number  ))

Did you run your scripts through the 2to3 converter tool? This is one
of the many changes it can apply automatically.

 Again, this is just another example where leaving the advertised interface
 alone would have made more sense... unless of course, I'm missing something
 important here.

input() was rarely used correctly and is quite trivially replaced.
raw_input() was used much more frequently, but was a bit awkwardly
named. Python 3 made use of its backwards-incompatible status to
rectify both of these problems at once. Writing correct code will be
now easier for newbies.

If you're porting stuff to Python 3, using 2to3 and reading the
summary of changes from 2.x are absolute necessities.

Cheers,
Chris
--
http://blog.rebertia.com
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Input() in Python3

2011-04-22 Thread Westley Martínez
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 04:49:19PM +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:
 On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 4:22 PM, harrismh777 harrismh...@charter.net wrote:
  now we get this for input():
 
    raw_input(prompt) -- string
 
 I would have to say that the 2.x behaviour of input() is a mistake
 that's being corrected in 3.x. With a simple name like input(), it
 should do something simple and straightforward - not eval() the
 expression.
 
  to:        a = eval(input(enter a number  ))
 
 U NO. NO NO NO. What if someone enters os.exit() as their
 number? You shouldn't eval() unchecked user input!
 
 Chris Angelico

Right, there's no way to check you're getting a number, however using:

a = int(input('enter a number  ')) # use float() for floats

will raise an exception if it can't convert the string.
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Input() in Python3

2011-04-22 Thread Mel
Westley Martínez wrote:
 On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 04:49:19PM +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:

 U NO. NO NO NO. What if someone enters os.exit() as their
 number? You shouldn't eval() unchecked user input!
 
 Chris Angelico
 
 Right, there's no way to check you're getting a number, however using:
 
 a = int(input('enter a number  ')) # use float() for floats
 
 will raise an exception if it can't convert the string.

But sys.exit() doesn't return a string.  My fave is

Python 2.6.5 (r265:79063, Apr 16 2010, 13:09:56) 
[GCC 4.4.3] on linux2
Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
 import sys
 a = int (input ('enter a number '))
enter a number sys.setrecursionlimit(1)
Exception RuntimeError: 'maximum recursion depth exceeded while calling a 
Python object' in type 'exceptions.RuntimeError' ignored
Exception RuntimeError: 'maximum recursion depth exceeded while calling a 
Python object' in type 'exceptions.RuntimeError' ignored
Error in sys.excepthook:
RuntimeError: maximum recursion depth exceeded

Original exception was:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File stdin, line 1, in module
RuntimeError: maximum recursion depth exceeded while calling a Python object
 int (0)
Exception RuntimeError: 'maximum recursion depth exceeded while calling a 
Python object' in type 'exceptions.RuntimeError' ignored
Exception RuntimeError: 'maximum recursion depth exceeded while calling a 
Python object' in type 'exceptions.RuntimeError' ignored
Error in sys.excepthook:
RuntimeError: maximum recursion depth exceeded

Original exception was:
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File stdin, line 1, in module
RuntimeError: maximum recursion depth exceeded while calling a Python object
 


Mel.

-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Input() in Python3

2011-04-22 Thread Benjamin Kaplan
On Apr 22, 2011 10:12 AM, Mel mwil...@the-wire.com wrote:

 Westley Martínez wrote:
  On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 04:49:19PM +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:

  U NO. NO NO NO. What if someone enters os.exit() as their
  number? You shouldn't eval() unchecked user input!
 
  Chris Angelico
 
  Right, there's no way to check you're getting a number, however using:
 
  a = int(input('enter a number  ')) # use float() for floats
 
  will raise an exception if it can't convert the string.

 But sys.exit() doesn't return a string.  My fave is

 Python 2.6.5 (r265:79063, Apr 16 2010, 13:09:56)
 [GCC 4.4.3] on linux2
 Type help, copyright, credits or license for more information.
  import sys
  a = int (input ('enter a number '))
 enter a number sys.setrecursionlimit(1)
 Exception RuntimeError: 'maximum recursion depth exceeded while calling a
 Python object' in type 'exceptions.RuntimeError' ignored
 Exception RuntimeError: 'maximum recursion depth exceeded while calling a
 Python object' in type 'exceptions.RuntimeError' ignored
 Error in sys.excepthook:
 RuntimeError: maximum recursion depth exceeded

 Original exception was:
 Traceback (most recent call last):
  File stdin, line 1, in module
 RuntimeError: maximum recursion depth exceeded while calling a Python
object
  int (0)
 Exception RuntimeError: 'maximum recursion depth exceeded while calling a
 Python object' in type 'exceptions.RuntimeError' ignored
 Exception RuntimeError: 'maximum recursion depth exceeded while calling a
 Python object' in type 'exceptions.RuntimeError' ignored
 Error in sys.excepthook:
 RuntimeError: maximum recursion depth exceeded

 Original exception was:
 Traceback (most recent call last):
  File stdin, line 1, in module
 RuntimeError: maximum recursion depth exceeded while calling a Python
object
 


Mel.


We're talking about python 3, not python 2. If you're using python 2, the
equivalent code would be int(raw_input()) and that isn't vulnerable to this
sort of thing.
 --
 http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Input() in Python3

2011-04-22 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Mel mwil...@the-wire.com wrote:
 But sys.exit() doesn't return a string.  My fave is

It doesn't return _at all_. Boom, process terminated.

Chris Angelico
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Input() in Python3

2011-04-22 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 06:25:51 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:

 On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Mel mwil...@the-wire.com wrote:
 But sys.exit() doesn't return a string.  My fave is
 
 It doesn't return _at all_. Boom, process terminated.


Technically it raises an exception, which can then be caught by the usual 
exception-handling mechanism. So it's not quite Boom.

 try:
... sys.exit(42)
... except SystemExit as e:
... print(e.code)
...
42



-- 
Steven
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Input() in Python3

2011-04-22 Thread Chris Angelico
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Steven D'Aprano
steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info wrote:
 On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 06:25:51 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:

 On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 12:08 AM, Mel mwil...@the-wire.com wrote:
 But sys.exit() doesn't return a string.  My fave is

 It doesn't return _at all_. Boom, process terminated.


 Technically it raises an exception, which can then be caught by the usual
 exception-handling mechanism. So it's not quite Boom.

Sure, but it still doesn't return anything. In any case, it's not
something you want to eval casually in the middle of asking the user
for an integer.

Chris Angelico
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list