Re: 3.0 - bsddb removed
On Sun, 2009-03-22 at 15:55 +, Sean wrote: Anyone got any thoughts about what to use as a replacement. I need something (like bsddb) which uses dictionary syntax to read and write an underlying (fast!) btree or similar. gdbm -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: 3.0 - bsddb removed
Sean seandc at att.net writes: Anyone got any thoughts about what to use as a replacement. I need something (like bsddb) which uses dictionary syntax to read and write an underlying (fast!) btree or similar. pybsddb is just not included in the core. It's still distributed separately. http://www.jcea.es/programacion/pybsddb.htm -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: 3.0 - bsddb removed
Sean sea...@att.net wrote: Anyone got any thoughts about what to use as a replacement. I need something (like bsddb) which uses dictionary syntax to read and write an underlying (fast!) btree or similar. sqlite. bsddb gave me no end of trouble with threads, but sqlite worked brilliantly. You would need to make a dictionary interface to sqlite, eg http://code.activestate.com/recipes/576638/ Or do something a bit simpler yourself. -- Nick Craig-Wood n...@craig-wood.com -- http://www.craig-wood.com/nick -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: 3.0 - bsddb removed
On Mar 23, 3:30 am, Nick Craig-Wood n...@craig-wood.com wrote: You would need to make a dictionary interface to sqlite, eg http://code.activestate.com/recipes/576638/ Or do something a bit simpler yourself. Another option is to use the 'shove' module: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/shove Similar API to shelve, shove-able objects can be treated just like dicts, and it supports sqlite as a backend amongst many many others. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
