Re: Python dress

2017-09-13 Thread Sean DiZazzo
On Wednesday, September 13, 2017 at 3:02:18 PM UTC-7, bream...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 13, 2017 at 10:43:47 PM UTC+1, Sean DiZazzo wrote:
> > On Tuesday, September 12, 2017 at 9:18:12 AM UTC-7, larry@gmail.com 
> > wrote:
> > > Not too many females here, but anyway:
> > > 
> > > https://svahausa.com/collections/shop-by-interest-1/products/python-code-fit-flare-dress
> > > 
> > > (And if any guys want to wear this, there's nothing wrong with that.)
> > 
> > I'm going to buy it for my girl wear it to all of my work parties.  :)
> 
> What is she going to wear? :)
> 
> --
> Kindest regards.
> 
> Mark Lawrence.

She's gonna wear the geek dress with pride!  She knows.

There's a nice little Coco Chanel I have picked out for myself.  :P
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Python dress

2017-09-13 Thread Thomas Jollans
On 2017-09-13 02:54, Rick Johnson wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 12, 2017 at 6:59:32 PM UTC-5, Gregory Ewing wrote:
>> Larry Martell wrote:
>>> https://svahausa.com/collections/shop-by-interest-1/products/python-code-fit-flare-dress
>>
>> The only disadvantage might be the GIL interfering with
>> parallel processing using multiple machines in a
>> laundromat.
> 
> Oh, not the only disadvantage: being that 5 of the machines
> are running Python3, and 4 are running Python2, and one is
> still stubbornly running Python1, and being that the owner
> forgot to mark them, if we put the dress in the wrong
> machine -- *BOOM* -- exceptions all over the floor. 
> 
> Can anyone think of a way to version-test these machines
> without wasting a quarter, or requiring the services of a
> clean-up crew?
> 

Should "yield" at the machine in a menacing, regal voice. if it yields,
it is Python 2.3 or newer.


-- 
Thomas Jollans
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Python dress

2017-09-13 Thread Thomas Jollans
On 2017-09-13 02:12, MRAB wrote:
> On 2017-09-13 00:32, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
>> The amusing thing to my mind is that the pro-discrimination,
>> anti-equality
>> faction also tend to be the most conservative[1] pro-monarchy faction.
>> I don't
>> recall seeing them go into paroxysms of gender confusion when Prince
>> Charles,
>> Duke of Edinburgh, appears in public wearing a kilt.
>>
> You do know that Prince Charles is the Prince of Wales and that the Duke
> of Edinburgh is his father, don't you? :-)

Big difference. One will never be king, the other should never be king.



-- 
Thomas Jollans
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Python dress

2017-09-12 Thread Steven D'Aprano
On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 01:12:25 +0100, MRAB wrote:

>> I don't recall seeing them go into paroxysms of
>> gender confusion when Prince Charles,
>> Duke of Edinburgh, appears in public wearing a kilt.
> 
> You do know that Prince Charles is the Prince of Wales and that the Duke
> of Edinburgh is his father, don't you? :-)

Ah, yes, thanks for the correction. Of course I was thinking about Prince 
Philip, not Charles.


-- 
Steven D'Aprano
“You are deluded if you think software engineers who can't write 
operating systems or applications without security holes, can write
virtualization layers without security holes.” —Theo de Raadt
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Python dress

2017-09-12 Thread Steve D'Aprano
On Wed, 13 Sep 2017 02:16 am, Larry Martell wrote:

> Not too many females here, but anyway:
> 
>
https://svahausa.com/collections/shop-by-interest-1/products/python-code-fit-flare-dress

Was expecting a dress in a snake-skin pattern.

Was pleasantly surprised to see Insertion Sort in Python on a dress!


> (And if any guys want to wear this, there's nothing wrong with that.)

Assuming they can fit in the offered sizes :-)

Here in Australia, we're having an expensive, divisive, non-binding exercise in
political propaganda, a postal survey on whether or not to continue allowing
discrimination in marriage. The pro-discrimination side has run a TV
advertisement claiming that equal rights for marriage is just the first step
that will end with our sons being told they can wear dresses to school (and
possibly even lions and lambs lying down together in the field).

Apparently that's meant to be the end of the world as we know it, or something.

The amusing thing to my mind is that the pro-discrimination, anti-equality
faction also tend to be the most conservative[1] pro-monarchy faction. I don't
recall seeing them go into paroxysms of gender confusion when Prince Charles,
Duke of Edinburgh, appears in public wearing a kilt.





[1] Gosh, that's a shocker. Bet you didn't see that coming.

-- 
Steve
“Cheer up,” they said, “things could be worse.” So I cheered up, and sure
enough, things got worse.

-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Python dress

2017-09-12 Thread Leam Hall

On 09/12/2017 04:00 PM, Ben Finney wrote:

Larry Martell  writes:


https://svahausa.com/collections/shop-by-interest-1/products/python-code-fit-flare-dress
(And if any guys want to wear this, there's nothing wrong with that.)


Boo, the code is not PEP 8 conformant :-)

If it weren't for the bad code style, I might consider it. The dress
looks good!



Note that a google search of "python muscle shirt" didn't seem to come 
up with any code. Wonder why?  :P

--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Python dress

2017-09-12 Thread Ben Finney
Larry Martell  writes:

> https://svahausa.com/collections/shop-by-interest-1/products/python-code-fit-flare-dress
> (And if any guys want to wear this, there's nothing wrong with that.)

Boo, the code is not PEP 8 conformant :-)

If it weren't for the bad code style, I might consider it. The dress
looks good!

-- 
 \  “Contentment is a pearl of great price, and whosoever procures |
  `\it at the expense of ten thousand desires makes a wise and |
_o__)  happy purchase.” —J. Balguy |
Ben Finney

-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list


Re: Python dress

2017-09-12 Thread Jona Azizaj
It looks very nice, thanks for sharing :)


On 09/12/2017 06:16 PM, Larry Martell wrote:
> Not too many females here, but anyway:
>
> https://u434.ct.sendgrid.net/wf/click?upn=PEGtk34F2vzY-2FdDEgdADyR5WgaJXp3kK7yjjfCP4LBGKF2bSjvTFWCFYRlwVAQZ5HEeMdCPRw1tUKRf8HLGvHzOQQS1VCWAz-2FXnHFw36zPHseeHhMMPaOQoGFSuR98b4_-2Bhtkm6SDKcrqjRFK9GSlahGOHKvvNKRPEMAZ1tASX-2BnljYyh-2BoqYVc1h6KEMOxobwDxM8Dr0Jy9ZrPUamH2ONoCofjMh1-2F1ZTp8vs28IRq9-2FV-2BKG81NQ1WNnZqms0swnJ63OL0Ai78Q-2FoPsl-2B1T4gBR3ASVhYWQVYVs5TlijuEpg79GoCU7Mxh4SuDwC2QJQ4zf51XQJ-2BcNmZPwKUzr6oO6UidvYAoYDYNMp4HWhnC4-3D
>
> (And if any guys want to wear this, there's nothing wrong with that.)

-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list