Re: more itertools
On 01/09/2015 03:20, Chris Angelico wrote: On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Mark Lawrence <breamore...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: Thanks Chris, and Chris Angelico. Just to make sure I'm not completely barking can you try a search on pypi, as I know I've found it that way in the past, but literally not right now. The first hit I get for 'itertools' is picklable-itertools 0.1.1 with a weight of 9, 'more-itertools' finds nothing, 'more_itertools' takes you to https://pypi.python.org/pypi/langchangetrack/0.1.0. Or am I simply having another "shouldn't try this at stupid o'clock in the morning" phases? No, you're not barking. Or if you are, so am I. That's the exact same results I see. I wonder if the search is not currently looking at package names? A few quick searches for 'psycopg2', 'docstringargs', 'pytz', and such shows that a bunch of packages either aren't found at all, or are much lower in the list than something that references it. Other packages, like 'clize' and 'docutils', do come up at the top; they have their own names also in their descriptions. Looks like it's time to go to the bug tracker. ChrisA Okay, but I don't intend doing that too quickly as I'm all ready shattered, it being 03:45 and all that. But then you go to check which bug tracker and what do you find but https://bitbucket.org/pypa/pypi/issues/326/some-packages-not-showing-up-when -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
more itertools
This contained the itertool recipes and was available on pypi but looks like it's gone. Can anybody tell me if it's defunct, superceeded or what? -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: more itertools
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 11:42 AM, Mark Lawrence <breamore...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > This contained the itertool recipes and was available on pypi but looks like > it's gone. Can anybody tell me if it's defunct, superceeded or what? This one? https://pypi.python.org/pypi/more-itertools/ Though it hasn't been updated in a while, so it's possible you're talking about something else. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: more itertools
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Mark Lawrence <breamore...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > This contained the itertool recipes and was available on pypi but looks like > it's gone. Can anybody tell me if it's defunct, superseded or what? What do you mean? It's still there AFAICT: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/more-itertools Still installs fine too: $ pip install more-itertools Collecting more-itertools Downloading more-itertools-2.2.tar.gz Installing collected packages: more-itertools Running setup.py install for more-itertools Successfully installed more-itertools-2.2 $ python Python 2.7.10 (default, Jul 17 2015, 01:43:42) [GCC 4.2.1 Compatible Apple LLVM 6.1.0 (clang-602.0.53)] on darwin Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. >>> import more_itertools >>> Cheers, Chris P.S. It annoys me that the most of "recipes", which IME normally need no tweaking whatsoever, aren't just part of itertools proper. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: more itertools
Mark Lawrencewrites: > ... > can you try a search on pypi, as I know I've found > it that way in the past, but literally not right now. I have recently made a similar experience with "Products.CMFPlacefulWorkflow". Searching for this product does not find the package but "https://pypi.python.org/pypi/Products.CMFPlacefulWorkflow; leads to the package page. Apparently, the "PyPI" search started to behave strangely. Someone may need to file a bug report. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: more itertools
On 01/09/2015 02:52, Chris Rebert wrote: On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 6:42 PM, Mark Lawrence <breamore...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: This contained the itertool recipes and was available on pypi but looks like it's gone. Can anybody tell me if it's defunct, superseded or what? What do you mean? It's still there AFAICT: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/more-itertools Still installs fine too: $ pip install more-itertools Collecting more-itertools Downloading more-itertools-2.2.tar.gz Installing collected packages: more-itertools Running setup.py install for more-itertools Successfully installed more-itertools-2.2 $ python Python 2.7.10 (default, Jul 17 2015, 01:43:42) [GCC 4.2.1 Compatible Apple LLVM 6.1.0 (clang-602.0.53)] on darwin Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. import more_itertools Cheers, Chris P.S. It annoys me that the most of "recipes", which IME normally need no tweaking whatsoever, aren't just part of itertools proper. Thanks Chris, and Chris Angelico. Just to make sure I'm not completely barking can you try a search on pypi, as I know I've found it that way in the past, but literally not right now. The first hit I get for 'itertools' is picklable-itertools 0.1.1 with a weight of 9, 'more-itertools' finds nothing, 'more_itertools' takes you to https://pypi.python.org/pypi/langchangetrack/0.1.0. Or am I simply having another "shouldn't try this at stupid o'clock in the morning" phases? -- My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask what you can do for our language. Mark Lawrence -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: more itertools
Mark Lawrencewrites: > ... > But then you go to check > which bug tracker and what do you find but > https://bitbucket.org/pypa/pypi/issues/326/some-packages-not-showing-up-when Thus, the reporting is already done. Hope, there will be a fix soon :-) -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
Re: more itertools
On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Mark Lawrence <breamore...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote: > Thanks Chris, and Chris Angelico. Just to make sure I'm not completely > barking can you try a search on pypi, as I know I've found it that way in > the past, but literally not right now. The first hit I get for 'itertools' > is picklable-itertools 0.1.1 with a weight of 9, 'more-itertools' finds > nothing, 'more_itertools' takes you to > https://pypi.python.org/pypi/langchangetrack/0.1.0. Or am I simply having > another "shouldn't try this at stupid o'clock in the morning" phases? No, you're not barking. Or if you are, so am I. That's the exact same results I see. I wonder if the search is not currently looking at package names? A few quick searches for 'psycopg2', 'docstringargs', 'pytz', and such shows that a bunch of packages either aren't found at all, or are much lower in the list than something that references it. Other packages, like 'clize' and 'docutils', do come up at the top; they have their own names also in their descriptions. Looks like it's time to go to the bug tracker. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list