Re: [Python-mode] python.el (from gnu emacs) vs python-mode.el

2011-10-23 Thread Andreas Röhler

Am 22.10.2011 22:24, schrieb Brendan Miller:

What features does python-mode.el have above the version of python.el
that is included in GNU emacs? How do they compare?



M-x py- TAB displays a buffer with commands implemented by python-mode.el

resp. M-x python- TAB for python.el

As command names are self-explaining, you should get a kind of review 
that way.


as for features provided lately, have a look at the 
Announcements-section at


https://launchpad.net/python-mode


I recently tried to get ipython.el working, and found it had a
dependency on python-mode.el...



stuff from ipython.el has been merged into python-mode.el

Just do M-x ipython


This has prompted me to wonder what

the real differences between these modes are.

Does ropemacs work with python-mode.el?


Please put this question in

https://answers.launchpad.net/python-mode

As other people might have that question too, that will be helpful.

Thanks,

Andreas

--
https://launchpad.net/python-mode
https://launchpad.net/s-x-emacs-werkstatt/




___
Python-mode mailing list
Python-mode@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-mode



___
Python-mode mailing list
Python-mode@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-mode


[Python-mode] python.el (from gnu emacs) vs python-mode.el

2011-10-22 Thread Brendan Miller
What features does python-mode.el have above the version of python.el
that is included in GNU emacs? How do they compare?

I recently tried to get ipython.el working, and found it had a
dependency on python-mode.el... This has prompted me to wonder what
the real differences between these modes are.

Does ropemacs work with python-mode.el?
___
Python-mode mailing list
Python-mode@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-mode


Re: [Python-mode] python.el cleanup

2011-04-06 Thread Christoph Scholtes

Hi Andreas,

On 3/30/2011 8:10 AM, Andreas Röhler wrote:


glad to see Emacs python facilities improve. As you mention
python-mode.el, there are some remarks in python.el which I feel are not
correct. If some solution predates historically another, there are
usually some setbacks from being the first.


I am not sure which remarks you are referring to here.


OTOH from my perspective python-mode.el has still some point in proceding.


I don't think anybody is saying otherwise.


Hopefully we may discuss the pro and cons to the benefit of users, which
flavour they may choose finally. As you might have been remarked, its
interwoven to an extend, you can seldom discern it clearly to the one or
other origin.


To me, it really doesn't matter where it originated from or who was 
first. If it works great, great, if it does not, let's improve it. The 
goal should be the best Python support for Emacs possible.



BTW I'm not blaming the GNU's side. Just wanted to point at the issue so
we might hopefully reduce the obstacles.


Here, I am also not sure what issue or obstacles you are referring to.

Christoph
___
Python-mode mailing list
Python-mode@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-mode


Re: [Python-mode] python.el cleanup

2011-04-06 Thread Glenn Morris
Stefan Monnier wrote:

 The problem was with some of the other contributors, from what I remember.

For example, Andreas Roehler has issues with copyright assignments:

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-03/msg00029.html


Besides that, in 2008 an attempt was made to make a list of all the
contributors (it's presumably out-of-date now). The next step would be
for someone to figure out how much each person wrote. See

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-02/msg02156.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-02/msg02234.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-02/msg02201.html

and related messages.
___
Python-mode mailing list
Python-mode@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-mode


Re: [Python-mode] python.el cleanup

2011-04-05 Thread Stefan Monnier
Please don't reply on this list.


Stefan

 Andreas == Andreas Röhler andreas.roeh...@online.de writes:

 Am 05.04.2011 00:24, schrieb Glenn Morris:
 Stefan Monnier wrote:
 
 The problem was with some of the other contributors, from what I remember.
 
 For example, Andreas Roehler has issues with copyright assignments:
 
 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-03/msg00029.html
 
 

 So it is. My views didn't change since.


 Besides that, in 2008 an attempt was made to make a list of all the
 contributors (it's presumably out-of-date now). The next step would be
 for someone to figure out how much each person wrote.

 Computing is about ideas, not about counting code-lines.

 Even if a developer noticed a bug at the other side, which helped him to
 choose the right alternative, the other part is involved. Copyright in
 computing is such a nonsense, it's a shame pretending it.

 But let's come to some mistakes more neareby:

 - Stating someone signed the copyright-papers or not doesn't belong into the
 comment section of a code-file. That why I coming upon and the only reason
 so far.

 - The problems of Emacs' Python edits don't result from the existence of two
 different development branches, where _all_ developers have some merits of
 every side, as pointed at above. The problems result rather from a lack of
 imagination what's needed to have an environment as state of the art.

 So please, let's not jump into that eternal copyright loop. Let's go on
 bug-fixing and maybe building the environment afterwards.

 Cheers

 Andreas

 --
 https://code.launchpad.net/~a-roehler/python-mode/python-mode-components
 https://code.launchpad.net/s-x-emacs-werkstatt/




 
 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-02/msg02156.html
 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-02/msg02234.html
 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2008-02/msg02201.html
 
 and related messages.
 

___
Python-mode mailing list
Python-mode@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-mode


Re: [Python-mode] python.el cleanup

2011-04-04 Thread Stefan Monnier
 ;; That isn't covered by an FSF copyright assignment (?), unlike this
 ;; code, and seems not to be well-maintained for Emacs (though I've
 ;; submitted fixes).

 I've said before, but it's worth repeating.  While I still believe that at
 some point I did sign a copyright assignment for my contributions to
 python-mode.el, I also have absolutely no problem signing one again if for
 whatever (unimportant) reason, the FSF does not have one on file from me.

The problem was with some of the other contributors, from what
I remember.


Stefan
___
Python-mode mailing list
Python-mode@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-mode


Re: [Python-mode] python.el cleanup

2011-04-04 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Apr 04, 2011, at 05:46 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote:

 ;; That isn't covered by an FSF copyright assignment (?), unlike this
 ;; code, and seems not to be well-maintained for Emacs (though I've
 ;; submitted fixes).

 I've said before, but it's worth repeating.  While I still believe that at
 some point I did sign a copyright assignment for my contributions to
 python-mode.el, I also have absolutely no problem signing one again if for
 whatever (unimportant) reason, the FSF does not have one on file from me.

The problem was with some of the other contributors, from what
I remember.

Is there a way to check specifically?  I'm sure we could get Skip, Tim, and
Ken to sign papers if necessary.

-Barry


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Python-mode mailing list
Python-mode@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-mode


Re: [Python-mode] python.el cleanup

2011-04-04 Thread skip

 The problem was with some of the other contributors, from what I
 remember.

Barry Is there a way to check specifically?  I'm sure we could get
Barry Skip, Tim, and Ken to sign papers if necessary.

I have also volunteered relatively recently (within the last couple months)
to wet sign again (which I did probably 10 years ago for the GNU folks).

Skip
___
Python-mode mailing list
Python-mode@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-mode


Re: [Python-mode] python.el cleanup

2011-03-30 Thread Andreas Röhler

Am 30.03.2011 04:58, schrieb Christoph Scholtes:

Stefan Monniermonn...@iro.umontreal.ca  writes:


Could you just clarify why they're considered obsolete (e.g. what would
the user use instead)?


`python-shell' is not needed since Dave's mode already had
'run-python' to invoke the python interpreter. It offers no advantages
over run-python as far as I can tell except being able to toggle
between a Python and a Jython shell (see below for comments on that).

`python-comint-filter-function' is only called from `python-shell'.

`python-file-queue' is never populated anywhere, only read from
`python-comint filter-function'.

`python-default-interpreter' is only used by `python-shell' and not,
as advertised in its documentation, on first visiting a Python mode
buffer.

`python-python-command-args' and `python-jython-command-args' are only
used in the `python-toggle-shell' function.

`python-which-shell', `python-which-args' and `python-which-bufname'
are used for toggling between the Python and Jython shell.

Finally, `python-toggle-shell'. I think, that we should provide a better
solution for this and therefore remove the current implementation. This
code came from python-mode.el, if I traced that back right.



Hi Christoph,

glad to see Emacs python facilities improve. As you mention 
python-mode.el, there are some remarks in python.el which I feel are not 
correct. If some solution predates historically another, there are 
usually some setbacks from being the first.


OTOH from my perspective python-mode.el has still some point in proceding.

Hopefully we may discuss the pro and cons to the benefit of users, which 
flavour they may choose finally. As you might have been remarked, its 
interwoven to an extend, you can seldom discern it clearly to the one or 
other origin.


BTW I'm not blaming the GNU's side. Just wanted to point at the issue so 
we might hopefully reduce the obstacles.


Cheers


Andreas

--
https://code.launchpad.net/~a-roehler/python-mode/python-mode-components
https://code.launchpad.net/s-x-emacs-werkstatt/






Python interpreter selection should be universal and not only support Jython
and CPython, but also IronPyton, PyPy etc. I would like to implement a
better solution for this as soon as Fabian's changes are installed. I am
using IronPython quite a bit and it would be nice to be able to switch
flexibly between different interpreters.

Christoph




___
Python-mode mailing list
Python-mode@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-mode


Re: [Python-mode] python.el cleanup

2011-03-30 Thread Barry Warsaw
Thanks for CC'ing me.  I'm now subscribed to emacs-devel via Gmane.

On Mar 30, 2011, at 04:10 PM, Andreas Röhler wrote:

glad to see Emacs python facilities improve. As you mention python-mode.el,
there are some remarks in python.el which I feel are not correct. If some
solution predates historically another, there are usually some setbacks from
being the first.  OTOH from my perspective python-mode.el has still some
point in proceding.  Hopefully we may discuss the pro and cons to the benefit
of users, which flavour they may choose finally.

Yes, let's please try to converge Python support in Emacs as much as
possible.  I've heard there are now 4 Python modes, which if true, is really
not helping users.

All history aside, I applaud efforts to find ways to consolidate the modes,
keeping in mind the features and behavior users find important from each of
the flavors.  Andreas is doing the majority of the work on python-mode.el
these days, and we have a vibrant community on python-mode@python.org and an
active project on Launchpad.  I personally am much more of a user than
developer these days (too busy with other things Pythonic), but by no means
the only person using python-mode.el.

Cheers,
-Barry


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Python-mode mailing list
Python-mode@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-mode


Re: [Python-mode] python.el

2011-02-05 Thread skip

Eric in all seriousness, please don't waste any more time on the free
Eric software foundation. I have decided to not support them anymore
Eric since Stallman told me that the needs of free software come before
Eric the needs of disabled people.

+1.

S

___
Python-mode mailing list
Python-mode@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-mode


Re: [Python-mode] python.el

2011-02-04 Thread Andreas Röhler

Am 03.02.2011 22:48, schrieb Aaron Culich:

On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:13 PM,s...@pobox.com  wrote:



Georg  - From reading emacs-devel, it seems that the python.el has made
Georg  changes to the mode and explicitly taken them out of the
Georg  copyright assignment for the FSF, so Emacs upstream can't include
Georg  them.

Georg  So now we are at three different python modes for Emacs... :|

I'm not sure I understand.  Someone forked python.el but won't allow the
changes to go back into the GNU version?  Wouldn't that violate the GPL or
LGPL.  Who did this?



Copyright assignment is an issue separate from the license itself. To the
extent that Dave's version is derived from the existing python.el then the
GNU GPL still applies to his version of python.el if he distributes it to
other people. He is the owner of the new code that he has written, so that
means if he finds someone that redistributes his code in a manner that is
violating the GNU GPL license, then he has the legal standing to pursue that
violation in court as the copyright holder. However, no one else has the
right to pursue it in court on his behalf; you could bring a case to court,
but it would be thrown out in just the same way as if you tried to bring a
lawsuit against someone illegally redistributing MS Word; you can't sue
someone for that, but Microsoft can if they chose to. The license, whether
free or proprietary, can only be enforced in the courts by the copyright
holder.

The issue of enforcement is one of reasons that the GNU project long ago
made a requirement that any code contributions accepted back into the code
base and officially branded as GNU software must also have any accompanying
copyright assignment.

There are other reasons, as well, including protection from patents so that
it would prevent someone from contributing source code to the GNU project on
one hand, and then on the other hand using patents against the same set of
code. You can read that in the language of one of the example copyright
assignment forms I've linked to below.

-Aaron

Here is some further reading:

An official statement about why they require copyright assignment:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-assign.html

An example of the copyright assignment form
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-09/msg00678.html

Excerpt from the above form intended to protect against harm from patents:


The Assigner hereby agrees that if it has or acquires hereafter any
patent or interface copyright or other intellectual property interest
dominating the program enhanced by the Work (or use of that program), such
dominating interest will not be used to undermine the effect of this
assignment, i.e. the Foundation and the general public will be licensed to
use, in that program and its derivative works, without royalty or
limitation, the subject matter of the dominating interest.  This license
provision will be binding on the assignees of, or other successors to, the
dominating interest, as well as on the Assigner.



Hi Aaron,

saw you digged into this only after sending my short statement with 
other post.
Sorry for that, would have been more explicit seeing the interest in the 
matter.


It is wast one beside.

FSF thinks by making these assignment provisions,
--partly to the extent of the contributors, setting
them on risk rather than the FSF itself-- to do
something good.

Far from that: by raising the level of
specification already it provides uncertainty rather
than certainty.

Let me point at the risks already introduced by GPL in
this globalised world. Any conflict around would
endanger contributors, as being summoned before a
Bostonian court many of them will not be able to pay
 the costs.

From this perspective GPL already bears a --rather
unspecified-- but potential menace and danger for all
using it.

Decided taking that risk, as you see. But I'm not
willing to take more.

As for copy-rights I'm protected by our domestic laws,
which promess even gratis assistance in certain cases
of conflicts. Why should I give up that protection by
signing up to US-courts?

Andreas

--
https://code.launchpad.net/~a-roehler/python-mode/python-mode-components
https://code.launchpad.net/s-x-emacs-werkstatt/



___
Python-mode mailing list
Python-mode@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-mode


Re: [Python-mode] python.el

2011-02-04 Thread Andreas Röhler

[ ... ]

  He must

have a big bee in his bonnet.




Always being patient with the genial.

Which permits being patient with the common one, including myself.

:-)

Cheers

Andreas
___
Python-mode mailing list
Python-mode@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-mode


Re: [Python-mode] python.el

2011-02-04 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Feb 04, 2011, at 09:16 AM, Andreas Röhler wrote:

However, let me clarify: Emacs _can_ include, as long it is GPL and it is.

But they won't.

And so we can.

Yes, we're not bound by the same copyright assignment policy.

It's just to give up the insane copyright-policy, where I see no legitime
reason for, which denigrates the GPL as such.

The FSF has their reasons, which I think are legitimate for them.

As much as I wish we could merge all the different versions and get
python-mode.el into GNU Emacs, it may simply be impossible - or not worth the
effort.  Apologies for fanning those old flames again.

-Barry


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Python-mode mailing list
Python-mode@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-mode


Re: [Python-mode] python.el

2011-02-04 Thread Andreas Röhler

Am 04.02.2011 16:30, schrieb Barry Warsaw:

On Feb 04, 2011, at 09:16 AM, Andreas Röhler wrote:


However, let me clarify: Emacs _can_ include, as long it is GPL and it is.


But they won't.


And so we can.


Yes, we're not bound by the same copyright assignment policy.


It's just to give up the insane copyright-policy, where I see no legitime
reason for, which denigrates the GPL as such.


The FSF has their reasons,


Hi Barry,

I'm consenting to that. There is some rationale.

 which I think are legitimate for them.


As much as I wish we could merge all the different versions and get
python-mode.el into GNU Emacs, it may simply be impossible - or not worth the
effort.


Policies tend to change. BTW assigned the disclaimer of FSF and there 
are some lines by me already in GNU Emacs. So assignment is not an 
absolute barrier even now.


:-)

Andreas

  Apologies for fanning those old flames again.


-Barry


___
Python-mode mailing list
Python-mode@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-mode


Re: [Python-mode] python.el

2011-02-04 Thread Eric S. Johansson

On 2/4/2011 12:37 PM, Andreas Röhler wrote:

Am 04.02.2011 16:30, schrieb Barry Warsaw:

On Feb 04, 2011, at 09:16 AM, Andreas Röhler wrote:



oh bloody hell, this is the third time I've seen you guys go around this barn.  
:-)  try something different like merging work with the other other python mode 
or be my coding slave...er, minion... ah, friend with editing privileges to help 
me make progress on accessibility needs.


in all seriousness, please don't waste any more time on the free software 
foundation. I have decided to not support them anymore since Stallman told me 
that the needs of free software come before the needs of disabled people.


---eric
___
Python-mode mailing list
Python-mode@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-mode


Re: [Python-mode] python.el

2011-02-03 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Feb 03, 2011, at 09:23 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:

- From reading emacs-devel, it seems that the python.el has made
changes to the mode and explicitly taken them out of the copyright
assignment for the FSF, so Emacs upstream can't include them.

So now we are at three different python modes for Emacs... :|

Wonderful.

http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/135075

We should reach out and see if there's another opportunity for them to adopt
python-mode.el.  Anybody want to take that on? :)

-Barry


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Python-mode mailing list
Python-mode@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-mode


Re: [Python-mode] python.el

2011-02-03 Thread Georg Brandl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Am 03.02.2011 22:13, schrieb s...@pobox.com:
 
 Georg - From reading emacs-devel, it seems that the python.el has made
 Georg changes to the mode and explicitly taken them out of the
 Georg copyright assignment for the FSF, so Emacs upstream can't include
 Georg them.
 
 Georg So now we are at three different python modes for Emacs... :|
 
 I'm not sure I understand.  Someone forked python.el but won't allow the
 changes to go back into the GNU version?  Wouldn't that violate the GPL or
 LGPL.  Who did this?

Sorry, the word author is missing in my original message.  See the thread
linked by Barry, in particular the message by Stefan Monnier, for more details.

Georg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk1LGwUACgkQN9GcIYhpnLBfZwCgj4NW4Z9Tw58iQkg861BoEaMX
G8wAoJQS+Vm5zrphK3Bj1kw9D/9OuZ9b
=WiY2
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Python-mode mailing list
Python-mode@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-mode


Re: [Python-mode] python.el

2011-02-03 Thread skip

Barry Wonderful.

Barry http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/135075

Wasn't a lot of our heartburn alwhile ago precipitated by Dave Love?  He of
the massive-patch-which-must-not-be-divided?  In fact, isn't he the original
author of the the python.el which *is* delivered with GNU Emacs?  He must
have a big bee in his bonnet.

Skip

___
Python-mode mailing list
Python-mode@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-mode


Re: [Python-mode] python.el

2011-02-03 Thread Georg Brandl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Am 03.02.2011 22:19, schrieb s...@pobox.com:
 
 Barry Wonderful.
 
 Barry http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/135075
 
 Wasn't a lot of our heartburn alwhile ago precipitated by Dave Love?  He of
 the massive-patch-which-must-not-be-divided?  In fact, isn't he the original
 author of the the python.el which *is* delivered with GNU Emacs?  He must
 have a big bee in his bonnet.

All true -- well, except for the last one, which I don't really know ;)

Georg
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk1LHaAACgkQN9GcIYhpnLBH2gCeKSzCOMd08HJUBmWZVfNJVW9T
uL4AniwgCOm6f6gC+fG007mayVZbWt4t
=H4q0
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Python-mode mailing list
Python-mode@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-mode


Re: [Python-mode] python.el

2011-02-03 Thread Aaron Culich
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 1:13 PM, s...@pobox.com wrote:


Georg - From reading emacs-devel, it seems that the python.el has made
Georg changes to the mode and explicitly taken them out of the
Georg copyright assignment for the FSF, so Emacs upstream can't include
Georg them.

Georg So now we are at three different python modes for Emacs... :|

 I'm not sure I understand.  Someone forked python.el but won't allow the
 changes to go back into the GNU version?  Wouldn't that violate the GPL or
 LGPL.  Who did this?


Copyright assignment is an issue separate from the license itself. To the
extent that Dave's version is derived from the existing python.el then the
GNU GPL still applies to his version of python.el if he distributes it to
other people. He is the owner of the new code that he has written, so that
means if he finds someone that redistributes his code in a manner that is
violating the GNU GPL license, then he has the legal standing to pursue that
violation in court as the copyright holder. However, no one else has the
right to pursue it in court on his behalf; you could bring a case to court,
but it would be thrown out in just the same way as if you tried to bring a
lawsuit against someone illegally redistributing MS Word; you can't sue
someone for that, but Microsoft can if they chose to. The license, whether
free or proprietary, can only be enforced in the courts by the copyright
holder.

The issue of enforcement is one of reasons that the GNU project long ago
made a requirement that any code contributions accepted back into the code
base and officially branded as GNU software must also have any accompanying
copyright assignment.

There are other reasons, as well, including protection from patents so that
it would prevent someone from contributing source code to the GNU project on
one hand, and then on the other hand using patents against the same set of
code. You can read that in the language of one of the example copyright
assignment forms I've linked to below.

-Aaron

Here is some further reading:

An official statement about why they require copyright assignment:
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-assign.html

An example of the copyright assignment form
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2002-09/msg00678.html

Excerpt from the above form intended to protect against harm from patents:

The Assigner hereby agrees that if it has or acquires hereafter any
 patent or interface copyright or other intellectual property interest
 dominating the program enhanced by the Work (or use of that program), such
 dominating interest will not be used to undermine the effect of this
 assignment, i.e. the Foundation and the general public will be licensed to
 use, in that program and its derivative works, without royalty or
 limitation, the subject matter of the dominating interest.  This license
 provision will be binding on the assignees of, or other successors to, the
 dominating interest, as well as on the Assigner.


___
Python-mode mailing list
Python-mode@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-mode


Re: [Python-mode] python.el

2011-02-03 Thread Barry Warsaw
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256

On Feb 03, 2011, at 10:13 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:

Would we be able to find all the contributors and get them to sign papers
for the FSF?  Otherwise there's no need to even think about that step.

At one point in the distant past we *did* that and sent it to the FSF (IIRC,
Tim Peters, Ken M. and myself at the very least).  IMHO, they lost the
paperwork and we've been lax about tracking it ever since getting rebuffed.

But aside from that, I would certainly be willing and able to assign copyright
for my changes.  Again.  I haven't looked at the changelogs in a long time so
I don't know how easy it would be to track everyone else down.  Tim, Ken,
Skip, Andreas, you should all be possible.  I don't know if that's enough.

- -Barry
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
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=+Rvs
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
___
Python-mode mailing list
Python-mode@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-mode