Re: [Python-modules-team] [Openstack-devel] ITP: python-gear -- python-gear: pure python async library to interact with, gearman
On 10/02/2013 05:01 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > > > Julien Danjou wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 01 2013, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> >>> Could you please maintain this package using Git? It'd be nice, since >>> that's an OpenStack stuff, and that everything there is maintained >> using >>> Git. If there is still resistance in the Python Module team, then you >>> can use collab-maint. Your thoughts? >> >> This is not OpenStack related at all, there's no reason to limit its >> maintenance to the OpenStack team. >> I don't think the Python module team aims to switch to Git, so >> collab-maint would be a good choice if git is retained. > > Last time we discussed this, we identified some things that needed to > be resolved before we could switch. I don't think there was anything to be resolved, just it needed someone to work on it. > The problem isn't resistance, but > that the magic some people seem to be waiting for to do the work is > being slow. I don't agree with this view. I saw that the Git repository of the team has been *deactivated* by one of the PMT admins on Alioth. :( Yes, there is resistance. > Anyone who wants to switch to git should work on switching. I would like to start uploading my modules in the Git of Alioth of the team, regardless if there is still some old SVN repositories or not (and this, because it's taking too much time until anyone does something, though we've got some stuff to do...). Though I don't have the admin rights on the PMT team to reactivate the Git repo. Seeing that lots of people are using collab-maint instead of the team VCS because SVN sux shows there's really a problem here, and that we really need to accept Git repositories, even if old ones haven't migrated (yet). Saying that we only want a single VCS type is already an obsolete statement, as that's not the case anymore anyway if we consider those in collab-maint. Thomas ___ Python-modules-team mailing list Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
Re: [Python-modules-team] [Openstack-devel] ITP: python-gear -- python-gear: pure python async library to interact with, gearman
On Tue, Oct 01 2013, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > I'm doing this this by moving packages that i plan to work on into > collab-maint, instead of the python modules team. Sorry :( I'm doing this too for what it's worth, and I don't think it's a problem. Collab-maint is good to do that, and I can't see any issue using it rather than the Python team repositories. -- Julien Danjou ;; Free Software hacker ; independent consultant ;; http://julien.danjou.info signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Python-modules-team mailing list Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
Re: [Python-modules-team] [Openstack-devel] ITP: python-gear -- python-gear: pure python async library to interact with, gearman
On 10/01/2013 05:01 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote: > Julien Danjou wrote: >> This is not OpenStack related at all, there's no reason to limit its >> maintenance to the OpenStack team. >> I don't think the Python module team aims to switch to Git, so >> collab-maint would be a good choice if git is retained. > > Last time we discussed this, we identified some things that needed to be > resolved before we could switch. The problem isn't resistance, but that the > magic some people seem to be waiting for to do the work is being slow. This is unfortunately not my recollection of events, but i don't have the time or mental energy to dig back through the archives right now and rehash that struggle. I'll just say that as someone who hoped to help the python module team move to git, i felt the resistance was sufficiently strong that my limited time was best used elsewhere. > Anyone who wants to switch to git should work on switching. I'm not planning > to work on it myself because I don't care which we use. I'm doing this this by moving packages that i plan to work on into collab-maint, instead of the python modules team. Sorry :( --dkg signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Python-modules-team mailing list Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
Re: [Python-modules-team] [Openstack-devel] ITP: python-gear -- python-gear: pure python async library to interact with, gearman
Julien Danjou wrote: >On Tue, Oct 01 2013, Thomas Goirand wrote: > >> Could you please maintain this package using Git? It'd be nice, since >> that's an OpenStack stuff, and that everything there is maintained >using >> Git. If there is still resistance in the Python Module team, then you >> can use collab-maint. Your thoughts? > >This is not OpenStack related at all, there's no reason to limit its >maintenance to the OpenStack team. >I don't think the Python module team aims to switch to Git, so >collab-maint would be a good choice if git is retained. Last time we discussed this, we identified some things that needed to be resolved before we could switch. The problem isn't resistance, but that the magic some people seem to be waiting for to do the work is being slow. Anyone who wants to switch to git should work on switching. I'm not planning to work on it myself because I don't care which we use. Scott K ___ Python-modules-team mailing list Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
Re: [Python-modules-team] [Openstack-devel] ITP: python-gear -- python-gear: pure python async library to interact with, gearman
On Tue, Oct 01 2013, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Could you please maintain this package using Git? It'd be nice, since > that's an OpenStack stuff, and that everything there is maintained using > Git. If there is still resistance in the Python Module team, then you > can use collab-maint. Your thoughts? This is not OpenStack related at all, there's no reason to limit its maintenance to the OpenStack team. I don't think the Python module team aims to switch to Git, so collab-maint would be a good choice if git is retained. -- Julien Danjou /* Free Software hacker * independent consultant http://julien.danjou.info */ signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ Python-modules-team mailing list Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team
