[Python-modules-team] python-yaml: can it be priority optional?

2009-03-23 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
Hi,

python-yaml seems to be a priority: extra package, and I have a
package dependent on it which is priority: optional. Before I change the
priority, is there any reason python-yaml can't become optional instead?

(please keep me in CC, and if you'd rather I file a bug that's no
problem.)

Thanks

-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire

PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3  A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team

Re: [Python-modules-team] python-yaml: can it be priority optional?

2009-03-23 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:04:45 + Jonathan Wiltshire 
deb...@jwiltshire.org.uk wrote:
Hi,

python-yaml seems to be a priority: extra package, and I have a
package dependent on it which is priority: optional. Before I change the
priority, is there any reason python-yaml can't become optional instead?

(please keep me in CC, and if you'd rather I file a bug that's no
problem.)


It's extra because (and only because) it depends on libyaml whic is extra.  If 
you get libyaml 
moved to optional, I've no problem moving pyyaml back to optional.

Scott K

___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team


Re: [Python-modules-team] python-yaml: can it be priority optional?

2009-03-23 Thread Jonathan Wiltshire
On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 06:24:43AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
 It's extra because (and only because) it depends on libyaml whic is extra.  
 If you get libyaml 
 moved to optional, I've no problem moving pyyaml back to optional.

I've been in touch with Anders Kaseorg, libyaml's maintainer, and his
next release is going to put it into optional. So, if you don't mind
doing the same, that makes the whole tree nice and consistent.

Cheers


-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire

PGP/GPG: 0xDB800B52 / 4216 F01F DCA9 21AC F3D3  A903 CA6B EA3E DB80 0B52


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team

Re: [Python-modules-team] python-yaml: can it be priority optional?

2009-03-23 Thread Scott Kitterman
On Monday 23 March 2009 13:33, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
 On Mon, Mar 23, 2009 at 06:24:43AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
  It's extra because (and only because) it depends on libyaml whic is
  extra.  If you get libyaml moved to optional, I've no problem moving
  pyyaml back to optional.

 I've been in touch with Anders Kaseorg, libyaml's maintainer, and his
 next release is going to put it into optional. So, if you don't mind
 doing the same, that makes the whole tree nice and consistent.

That's no problem at all.  It was optional before it depended on libyaml and I 
see no reason for it not to be again.

Scott K

___
Python-modules-team mailing list
Python-modules-team@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/python-modules-team