Re: Wrong regression test cases
On 4/2/14 8:51 AM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote: Hi, from time to time there is a suspect that there are errors in test case descriptions, currently I know: Issue 124523 - Testcase requires not existing feature wildcards https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124523 Issue 124535 - Wrong Test description for hyperlinks in Writer TOC https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124535 Is there any systematic review for the testcases? I don't know but it sounds useful and can be done short after a release where not many new things have to be tested. How should we proceed if errors have been found? creating an issue make sense, maybe we should add a new category for this. And these issues should be addressed in the same way as other issues. Ok they probably no showstopper for a release but QA work is very important and we should do our best to make the test case intuitive and understandable to use and execute. Juergen CU Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: 4.1. Regressions
Hi Rainer and all, Here is a batch of excluded issue numbers what have been checked and are no regressions, thanks Shao Zhi, Clarence and Steve for your checking! NoDescriptionMost early versionRegression in 4.1?New Issue in 4.1?Checker 121115Opening a CSV file with several OO windows already open causes Text Import box to appear in unexpected location 3.4.1NN Shao Zhi 118061values not taken into account by sum.if in linked spreadsheets 3.4.1NNShao Zhi 117629comment arrow points wrongly 3.4.1NNShao Zhi 114067Insert a line in a big calc file take a long time 3.4.1 NNShao Zhi 111301Calc: Text in cell is truncated when file is reopened 3.4.1NNShao Zhi 109420financial function VDB returns incorrect valuesOOo 3.3 or olderNNShao Zhi 123954Can't identify Data formats in MS2010 when exporting .doc file with Date field, 3.4.1NNYan Peng 124136Graphics bullet list cannot be selected by clicking on graphic bullets image OOo 3.3 or olderNNYan Peng 120153Save xls format WITHOUT password creates a password protected file, 4.0.1NNYan Peng 124437Opening password protected files not possible, 4.1 (CLOSED NOT_AN_ISSUE, )NNYin Bing 124028Highlight of commented/annotated text range gets lost when export as PDF, 4.1 (Enhacement)NYYin Bing 123886Toolbars customization 'Cancel' does the same like 'OK' , OOo 3.3 or olderNNYin Bing On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Rainer Bielefeld rainerbielefeld_ooo...@bielefeldundbuss.de wrote: Yuzhen Fan schrieb: Here is the analysis of possible cases Hi, plausible description of the task, I'm more or less proceeding so. I will send you bug list for your review Difficult - I currently prefer to check issues where I have knowledge first, not to proceed a list. Other volunteers might think similar. If you agree we can use my https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype= runnamedlist_id=133742namedcmd=410_RegressionTest (or something similar?) for a while, I can add Exclude issue numbers what have been checked and are no regressions after short mail here, rest fall out of the list one by one because they got keyword regression or more early version number or whatever. Nevertheless, we should find proceedings what can increase efficiency by avoiding double work. May be some volunteers add themselves to QA Contact in bugs where they have skills and want to proceed them within a week or so? CU Rainer - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- Regards, Yu Zhen
Re: Wrong regression test cases
On Wed, Apr 2, 2014, at 11:12, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: creating an issue make sense, maybe we should add a new category for this. And these issues should be addressed in the same way as other issues. Ok they probably no showstopper for a release but QA work is very important and we should do our best to make the test case intuitive and understandable to use and execute. Juergen We don't have a category for a bug with missing description (we use Resolved-Irreproducible) - why should we have a category for a test case with missing description? Adding a category means we are OK with such problematic test cases? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: 4.1. Regressions
Yuzhen Fan schrieb: Here is a batch of excluded Hi, thanks a lot, perfect work! A quick test query [2] showed 0 hits what means that in affected bug reports all relevant fields have been modified correctly so that the reports are no longer possible regressions for the query 410_RegressionTest. Best regards Rainer Hyperlinks: [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_severity=blockerbug_severity=criticalbug_severity=majorbug_severity=normalbug_status=UNCONFIRMEDbug_status=CONFIRMEDbug_status=ACCEPTEDbug_status=REOPENEDf1=keywordsf2=bug_idf3=cf_bug_typef4=bug_idknown_name=410_RegressionTestlist_id=137537o1=notsubstringo2=nowordso3=equalso4=anywordssubstrquery_based_on=410_RegressionTestquery_format=advancedresolution=---v1=regressionv2=1000%20124211%20124422v3=DEFECTv4=121115%20118061%20117629%20114067%20111301%20109420%20123954%20124136%20120153%20124437%20124028%20123886version=4.1.0-dev - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Re: New Bug reporters March 2014
On Tue, Apr 1, 2014 at 4:52 AM, Rainer Bielefeld rainerbielefeld_ooo...@bielefeldundbuss.de wrote: Hi, in March 2014 we have got 47 new AOO Bug reporters, who reported all together 55 bugs: Great news that these folks volunteered! Welcome everybody! No Reports Account --- 04anu6j...@gmail.com 03karlo.s...@gmail.com 02j.nitsc...@ok.de 02overcomer@gmail.com 02shlap...@henrico.k12.va.us 0173wa4...@sc.rr.com 01aeneum...@gmx.net 01agnies...@unity3d.com 01alexander.re...@googlemail.com 01alwynwelling...@gmail.com 01a...@luycx.com 01bobti...@earthlink.net 01bugzillaopen...@gmail.com 01claircou...@yahoo.co.uk 01daveun...@sbcglobal.net 01djpi...@hotmail.com 01edkni...@centurytel.net 01elke.dou...@free.fr 01galearn...@gmail.com 01gregpe...@hotmail.com 01gus.h...@gmail.com 01gwmcc...@charter.net 01halst...@gmail.com 01jak.badd...@hotmail.com 01kg.hammarl...@gmail.com 01lawall...@gmail.com 01leonb...@gmail.com 01lu...@crossimp.com 01lughnas...@seznam.cz 01majella.paul...@gmail.com 01marih...@qq.com 01maryfai...@hotmail.com 01mcleo...@gmail.com 01openoff...@margull.de 01p.jungw...@gmx.net 01paulp...@optonline.net 01pbd62...@icloud.com 01philip.mar...@outlook.com 01sandra.il...@yahoo.com 01szurketest...@gmail.com 01t_p_ander...@hotmail.com 01thesim...@gmail.com 01tio.mad...@hotmail.com 01turner_jm...@live.com 01voro...@gmail.com 01wegwe...@gmx.de 01wojciech.halicki.pis...@gmail.com Thank you all for your initiative. If you have any questions concerning your Bugzilla bug reports please feel free to add me to CC in the bug report. Best Regards Rainer Bielefeld - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org -- - MzK Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time, for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect. -- James Mason
Re: [RELEASE]: propose AOO 4.1.0 RC
Am 04/02/2014 04:45 PM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt: I hope that nobody have a problem with the revision number ...666 and the build date April 1th ;-) I find it funny and you can expect a very hot version ... What a mere chance. :-) Marcus On 4/2/14 3:16 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: Hi, FOLLOW UP discussion please on the dev list!!! Last week I proposed a final schedule for our upcoming AOO 4.1 release. We are a little bit behind because the fact that we had to fix some further critical issues. Nevertheless I would like to propose a first RC based on revision 1583666 from the AOO410 branch. We spend a lot of time in preparing the RC in time and the upload is ongoing. The MacOS and Windows versions are already available and the Linux upload is still ongoing. But keep in mind the binaries are for convenience and the release relevant bits are the source release. The RC builds can be found as always under https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds An overview of the fixes issues, enhancements and tasks going into this release can be found under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RC_fixes.html. I invite all volunteers to help with the verification of the fixed issues. Especially the issues related to translation updates/fixes should be verified by native speakers. A related RAT scan can be found under http://people.apache.org/~jsc/milestones/4.1.0-rc/AOO4.1.0_RAT_Scan.html I have also prepared patches (msp) for Windows and for the languages we have released with AOO 4.0.1. The patches are intended for private use only and of course for testing but not for the release. It's the first time that we prepared a complete set of patches and we have to test the functionality a little bit more. The related full install sets are prepared for patches in the future and can release patches in the future as well if they work as expected. By the way I have upgraded AOO 4.0.1 (en-US) on my Windows laptop with the msp to AOO 4.1 ;-) I plan to start a vote for this RC later today and let it run until Sunday night, means enough time to test and evaluate the bits careful. Linux binaries will be available tomorrow latest. We have not fixed and integrated all requested showstoppers because they were not all showstoppers from my perspective and we should take into account that we have limited resources in the project able to fix issues. We focused on issues that are obviously showstoppers and on those who are relevant for most of our users. Juergen - To unsubscribe, e-mail: qa-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: qa-h...@openoffice.apache.org
