Re: [Qemu-devel] AMD64+Solaris10 compile
Ishwar Rattan wrote: Is there a way to compile qemu-cvs-snapshot under Solaris-10 running on amd64 processor? -ishwar Take that: http://www.martux.org/qemu/XXX__qemu-0.8.2-solaris__20061010x11_g.tar.gz or http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/qemu/downloads/qemu-0.8.2-solaris.tar.gz (will be sync'ed later today) http://opensolaris.org/os/project/qemu/downloads/ M. ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
Re: [Qemu-devel] AMD64+Solaris10 compile
Eric Lowe wrote: Is there a way to compile qemu-cvs-snapshot under Solaris-10 running on amd64 processor? Check out the sources and instructions at http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/qemu There are some patches for 64-bit builds that I think still need to be committed to the main CVS source, you can create your own diffs -vs- the 0.8.2 stock source to see what was done to get 64-bit builds to work and apply the same changes to the CVS source if you really want the latest. You may also need to update your gcc (such as with Blastwave gcc) if /usr/sfw/bin/gcc doesn't work. There you will also find a kqemu accelerator module which should work for Solaris 10. - Eric Ah, ok, Eric already did respond. Nothing to add. -MB ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
[Qemu-devel] qemu and kernel 2.6.18
Hello all, I have recently installed the latest linux kernel, and i have been having problems with the tap interface since. I have been getting the following cryptic message: warning: could not configure /dev/net/tun: no virtual network emulation Could not initialize device 'tap' The tun driver is loaded, and /dev/net/tun is 'rw'. Any ideas what this is about? Could i have misconfigured something in the kernel? Cheers, George ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu and kernel 2.6.18
This came up in IRC a few days ago, it seems you need to use the UML util 'tunctl' to assign permissions to the tap device. I found this change annoying. On 10/13/06, G Portokalidis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, I have recently installed the latest linux kernel, and i have been having problems with the tap interface since. I have been getting the following cryptic message: warning: could not configure /dev/net/tun: no virtual network emulation Could not initialize device 'tap' The tun driver is loaded, and /dev/net/tun is 'rw'. Any ideas what this is about? Could i have misconfigured something in the kernel? Cheers, George ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel -- 22:38 @WaxDragon false ^ true 22:39 false :( 22:39 false dont you think you can XOR me and get away with it! I always return! ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
[Qemu-devel] configure flag for compilation question..
Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris. I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree ./configure --libdir=other-path --prefix=not-ustlocal is fine but make always generates binaries that want to find /usr/local/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0 etc. (checked with ldd). What is the way out for this sticky point? -ishwar ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
Re: [Qemu-devel] configure flag for compilation question..
Ishwar Rattan wrote: Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris. I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree ./configure --libdir=other-path --prefix=not-ustlocal is fine but make always generates binaries that want to find /usr/local/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0 etc. (checked with ldd). Where is the problem 64bit versus 32bit ? (32 bit version of libSDL-1.2.so.0 found while amd64 64bit version needed?) (should go under /usr/local/lib/amd64/libSDL-1.2.so.0) What is the way out for this sticky point? -ishwar Read ld.so.1(1) i.e. # man ld.so.1 Then: One option is to set $LD_LIBRARY_PATH (or potentially $LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64 [not required]). bash: # export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/export/home/me/foo/mypersonallibs:$LD_LIBRARY_PATH Did you set ./configure --prefix=SomeWritableLocation ? ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
Re: [Qemu-devel] configure flag for compilation question..
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Martin Bochnig wrote: Ishwar Rattan wrote: Where is the problem 64bit versus 32bit ? (32 bit version of libSDL-1.2.so.0 found while amd64 64bit version needed?) (should go under /usr/local/lib/amd64/libSDL-1.2.so.0) Well, the problem is I do not root privileges so can't place libSL in /usr/local/lib or /usr/local/lib/amd64. I would like to keep it in $HOME/lib and want qemu to see the lib archive. I will try LD_LIBRARY_PATH option. Is to possible to have a staticly linked version of libSDL in the qemu binaries? -ishwar ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
Re: [Qemu-devel] configure flag for compilation question..
Ishwar Rattan wrote: On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Martin Bochnig wrote: Ishwar Rattan wrote: Where is the problem 64bit versus 32bit ? (32 bit version of libSDL-1.2.so.0 found while amd64 64bit version needed?) (should go under /usr/local/lib/amd64/libSDL-1.2.so.0) Well, the problem is I do not root privileges so can't place libSL in /usr/local/lib or /usr/local/lib/amd64. I would like to keep it in $HOME/lib and want qemu to see the lib archive. I will try LD_LIBRARY_PATH option. Is to possible to have a staticly linked version of libSDL in the qemu binaries? The short answer is NO, not on SunOS = 5.10 . Especially not for 64bit. In particular not for 64bit_amd64. You will hardly be able to meet the required dependencies. I'm leaving over the weekend now, much luck with it. -ishwar ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
Re: [Qemu-devel] configure flag for compilation question..
Ishwar Rattan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris. I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree ./configure --libdir=other-path --prefix=not-ustlocal is fine but make always generates binaries that want to find /usr/local/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0 etc. (checked with ldd). What is the way out for this sticky point? Manually add -L/usr/local/lib -R/usr/local/lib to the Makefile for the link phase so it will correctly add those paths to the library lookup. If I had a code base to look at this instance, I could tell you where. You could also add those flags to Makefile.target in the SOLARIS specific areas, which would probably make more sense. As Martin indicated, setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH may get you a running binary, but LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the wrong answer for Solaris. Ben ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
Re: [Qemu-devel] configure flag for compilation question..
Ishwar Rattan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris. I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree ./configure --libdir=other-path --prefix=not-ustlocal is fine but make always generates binaries that want to find /usr/local/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0 etc. (checked with ldd). What is the way out for this sticky point? Manually add -L/usr/local/lib -R/usr/local/lib to the Makefile for the link phase so it will correctly add those paths to the library lookup. If I had a code base to look at this instance, I could tell you where. You could also add those flags to Makefile.target in the SOLARIS specific areas, which would probably make more sense. As Martin indicated, setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH may get you a running binary, but LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the wrong answer for Solaris. Ben ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
Re: [Qemu-devel] configure flag for compilation question..
Ben Taylor wrote: Ishwar Rattan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris. I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree ./configure --libdir=other-path --prefix=not-ustlocal is fine but make always generates binaries that want to find /usr/local/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0 etc. (checked with ldd). What is the way out for this sticky point? Manually add -L/usr/local/lib -R/usr/local/lib Rather -L/his/home/sdl_amd64/lib -R/his/home/sdl_amd64/lib Because I doubt, an amd64 version of libSDL is currently present in /usr/local/lib/amd64 (and he doesn't have w access). This method is btw not really new to me, see my posting from a few hours ago: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=15448tstart=0 to the Makefile for the link phase so it will correctly add those paths to the library lookup. If I had a code base to look at this instance, I could tell you where. You could also add those flags to Makefile.target in the SOLARIS specific areas, which would probably make more sense. As Martin indicated, setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH may get you a running binary, but LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the wrong answer for Solaris. Ben LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the wrong answer for Solaris ??? --- Weak statement. It has its [dis]advantages. Namely that the paths to a library are _not_ hardwired. That's the exactly reason, why I did recommend it in this very scenario. And I would do it again for Ishwar's current needs. -M. ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
Re: [Qemu-devel] configure flag for compilation question..
Ishwar Rattan wrote: Also, I downloaded the SDL-1.2.11 source from opensolaris.org download page. I can't figure out how to apply the 64bit patch (patch rejects the diffs, a visual inspection shows that patch is already applied to the source?) -ishwar Manually applying a patch will always work (vi or emacs -nw) Regards (leaving soon, really now) ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
Re: [Qemu-devel] configure flag for compilation question..
Ben Taylor wrote: As Martin indicated, setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH may get you a running binary, but LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the wrong answer for Solaris. My answer had been a bit longer: Read ld.so.1(1) i.e. # man ld.so.1 Then: *One* option is to set $LD_LIBRARY_PATH (or potentially $LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64 [not required]). ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu-system-sparc question?
On Wednesday 11 October 2006 18:20, Blue Swirl wrote: Sounds like you just want a bare-metal cross. There's absolutely no reason to run the editor, compiler or assembler on the target machine. Many targets even have gdb simulators (MIPS, ARM and PPC do). I disagree, it's much easier to use a native compiler than to build a cross compiler, even with crosstool. Well, with native toolchains you get prebuilt binaries from your system vendor, so building them is a non-issue. I don't believe that they're much easier to use in this context. If you're building prepackaged worktation software you might hit problems with crappy configure scripts. For a teaching environment I wouldn't expect it to be a problem, especially given the alternative is probably running on embedded dev boards. I don't think other compilers than GCC even support cross setups. That's definitely not true. Certainly anything targeting embedded systems are cross compilers (the target too small/slow to consider compiling natively), and I'd guess the same is true for many HPC systems (You don't want the clutter on your compute machines, esp. if they're used via batch jobs). In my experience pretty much all development is done with cross compilers from workstations or commodity compile farms. This means windows/x86-linux, or maybe a few crufty old solaris boxes left over from when sparc was fast :-) BTW, we could easily design and implement an ideal CPU just for Qemu purposes. It could be unlike any existing hardware, for example with zero or thousands of registers. The problem would be making a compiler for the CPU, also porting some OS to it. Any GCC and Linux guru volunteers? CS research projects? There's no such think as an Ideal cpu. It's like picking the right religion :-) If you want a toy cpu, there are things like mmix. While arm, ppc, mips, sparc, etc each have their own peculiarities, they're all reasonably clean architectures. Paul ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
Re: [Qemu-devel] configure flag for compilation question..
Martin Bochnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ben Taylor wrote: As Martin indicated, setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH may get you a running binary, but LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the wrong answer for Solaris. My answer had been a bit longer: Read ld.so.1(1) i.e. # man ld.so.1 Then: *One* option is to set $LD_LIBRARY_PATH (or potentially $LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64 [not required]). I'm not saying it doesn't work. But properly compiled programs for Solaris include the run time paths to the libraries so an LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable is not required. LD_LIBRARY_PATH is interesting to test out new versions of support libraries without actually having to recompile, so it has it's uses. but too often, folks use LD_LIBRARY_PATH as a panacea on Solaris to fix poorly compiled programs. Ben ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
Re: [Qemu-devel] configure flag for compilation question..
Ben Taylor wrote: Martin Bochnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ben Taylor wrote: As Martin indicated, setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH may get you a running binary, but LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the wrong answer for Solaris. My answer had been a bit longer: Read ld.so.1(1) i.e. # man ld.so.1 Then: *One* option is to set $LD_LIBRARY_PATH (or potentially $LD_LIBRARY_PATH_64 [not required]). I'm not saying it doesn't work. But properly compiled programs for Solaris include the run time paths to the libraries so an LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable is not required. LD_LIBRARY_PATH is interesting to test out new versions of support libraries without actually having to recompile, so it has it's uses. but too often, folks use LD_LIBRARY_PATH as a panacea on Solaris to fix poorly compiled programs. Ben He is experimenting and trying out a bit. Not building to be published packages. I advised him to read and understand ld.so.1(1). And I mentioned $LD_LIBRARY_PATH as *one* possible option for him to get quick results. ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
Re: [Qemu-devel] configure flag for compilation question..
Martin Bochnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ben Taylor wrote: Ishwar Rattan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris. I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree ./configure --libdir=other-path --prefix=not-ustlocal is fine but make always generates binaries that want to find /usr/local/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0 etc. (checked with ldd). What is the way out for this sticky point? Manually add -L/usr/local/lib -R/usr/local/lib Rather -L/his/home/sdl_amd64/lib -R/his/home/sdl_amd64/lib Yeah, that. brain fart when I was typing that. Because I doubt, an amd64 version of libSDL is currently present in /usr/local/lib/amd64 (and he doesn't have w access). Right. I knew what I meant, I just didn't type it right. This method is btw not really new to me, see my posting from a few hours ago: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=15448tstart=0 to the Makefile for the link phase so it will correctly add those paths to the library lookup. If I had a code base to look at this instance, I could tell you where. You could also add those flags to Makefile.target in the SOLARIS specific areas, which would probably make more sense. As Martin indicated, setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH may get you a running binary, but LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the wrong answer for Solaris. Ben LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the wrong answer for Solaris ??? --- Weak statement. LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the wrong answer for Solaris. It's great for trying to fix problems like this when the app won't run with a particular set of libraries, or you're testing with new libraries and you don't want to recompile (I've done this before). Too many people use it as a panacea for poorly compiled/configured Open source software. In this case, he might just set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH and never recompile it, even though it won't work if it uses the default LIB path. It has its [dis]advantages. Namely that the paths to a library are _not_ hardwired. But then that requires a dependency on knowing where your libraries are, and could possibly create an imcombaility by overriding a library path for some other application that is also leaning on LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Obviously you can get around this by encapsulating each application requiring LD_LIBRARY_PATH, thereby negating the need for a user or system wide LD_LIBRARY_PATH variable. That's the exactly reason, why I did recommend it in this very scenario. In this case, I can agree for the purposes of a test. But it also indicates that some work is required for the Solaris port if other library paths need to be linked in during the compliation/link phase. And I would do it again for Ishwar's current needs. Works for me. Ben ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
Re: [Qemu-devel] configure flag for compilation question..
Ishwar Rattan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Martin Bochnig wrote: Ishwar Rattan wrote: Where is the problem 64bit versus 32bit ? (32 bit version of libSDL-1.2.so.0 found while amd64 64bit version needed?) (should go under /usr/local/lib/amd64/libSDL-1.2.so.0) Well, the problem is I do not root privileges so can't place libSL in /usr/local/lib or /usr/local/lib/amd64. I would like to keep it in $HOME/lib and want qemu to see the lib archive. I will try LD_LIBRARY_PATH option. It should work. the main thing is to not to agressive with LD_LIBRARY_PATH in this case. Since it sounds like it already may be linking against /usr/local/lib where the current libSDL is, you should just be able to add the new lib dir to the LD_LIBRARY_PATH env variable, and then run ldd on qemu to make sure it's finding the right libraries. When you have the right LD_LIBRARY_PATH, then it should be working for you. Is to possible to have a staticly linked version of libSDL in the qemu binaries? There is an option for statically linked libSDL in the qemu binaries, and I tried to make sure I kept that intact for solaris in the configure script. Try it and see what happens. Ben ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
[Qemu-devel] Re: Hello
Ishwar Rattan wrote:
I think the SDL source I downloaded is already prepatched.
See the diff file below: my assumption is that --- indicates the
original file and +++ the patched version (I might be wrong
here). So, line in file with - in first column is reference to
original file and is to be replaced by with line with + in
first column.
Hi,
please ask Eric Lowe.
I did not prepare the x64/x86 stuff.
And the sdl amd64 bit patch is also from him.
The diff is not very big, that's true.
But it is not zero, I don't know.
I didn't build sdl for x64 so far.
I'm mostly the sparc guy.
I had been busy all week long in improving the src to better support
sparc-hosts.
Therefore didn't I come to amd64 so far, while I do intend to asap.
See my diff from yesterday (which is meanwhile totally obsolete again) :
http://www.martux.org/qemu/qemu-0.8.2-solaris__20061010x11.gdiff
Pls. gimme time until I throw the sparc pkg out before I can deeper look
into amd64-HOST support.
Thanks,
Martin
diff -ur SDL-1.2.11.orig/configure SDL-1.2.11.jnz/configure
--- SDL-1.2.11.orig/configure Tue Jun 27 06:48:54 2006
+++ SDL-1.2.11.jnz/configure Mon Sep 4 15:28:28 2006
@@ -33170,10 +33170,10 @@
if test x$enable_rpath = xyes; then
if test $ARCH = bsdi -o $ARCH = freebsd -o $ARCH = irix -o $ARCH =
linux -o $ARCH = netbsd; then
- SDL_RLD_FLAGS=-Wl,-rpath,\${exec_prefix}/lib
+ SDL_RLD_FLAGS=-Wl,-rpath,\${libdir}
fi
...
-- In configure file (of source distribution):
Lines around 33170+ already have the replacement done?
# Set runtime shared library paths as needed
if test x$enable_rpath = xyes; then
if test $ARCH = bsdi -o $ARCH = freebsd -o $ARCH = irix -o $ARCH =
linux -o $ARCH = netbsd; then
SDL_RLD_FLAGS=-Wl,-rpath,\${libdir}
fi
if test $ARCH = solaris; then
...
I am stumped by why the compiled binaries do not work. This is the
limit of my expertise. Can I find pre-patched SDL-1.2.11 source
somewhere?
Regards,
-ishwar
___
Qemu-devel mailing list
Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
Re: [Qemu-devel] configure flag for compilation question..
Ben Taylor wrote: Ishwar Rattan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 13 Oct 2006, Martin Bochnig wrote: Ishwar Rattan wrote: Where is the problem 64bit versus 32bit ? (32 bit version of libSDL-1.2.so.0 found while amd64 64bit version needed?) (should go under /usr/local/lib/amd64/libSDL-1.2.so.0) Well, the problem is I do not root privileges so can't place libSL in /usr/local/lib or /usr/local/lib/amd64. I would like to keep it in $HOME/lib and want qemu to see the lib archive. I will try LD_LIBRARY_PATH option. It should work. the main thing is to not to agressive with LD_LIBRARY_PATH in this case. Since it sounds like it already may be linking against /usr/local/lib where the current libSDL is, you should just be able to add the new lib dir to the LD_LIBRARY_PATH env variable, and then run ldd on qemu to make sure it's finding the right libraries. When you have the right LD_LIBRARY_PATH, then it should be working for you. Is to possible to have a staticly linked version of libSDL in the qemu binaries? There is an option for statically linked libSDL in the qemu binaries, Sounds funny. and I tried to make sure I kept that intact for solaris in the configure script. wow Try it and see what happens. Not much. Ben ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
Re: [Qemu-devel] configure flag for compilation question..
Ben Taylor wrote: Martin Bochnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ben Taylor wrote: Ishwar Rattan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Trying to compile qemu on amd64 based Solaris. I do not have write permission to /usr/local subtree ./configure --libdir=other-path --prefix=not-ustlocal is fine but make always generates binaries that want to find /usr/local/lib/libSDL-1.2.so.0 etc. (checked with ldd). What is the way out for this sticky point? Manually add -L/usr/local/lib -R/usr/local/lib Rather -L/his/home/sdl_amd64/lib -R/his/home/sdl_amd64/lib Yeah, that. brain fart when I was typing that. Because I doubt, an amd64 version of libSDL is currently present in /usr/local/lib/amd64 (and he doesn't have w access). Right. I knew what I meant, I just didn't type it right. This method is btw not really new to me, see my posting from a few hours ago: http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=15448tstart=0 to the Makefile for the link phase so it will correctly add those paths to the library lookup. If I had a code base to look at this instance, I could tell you where. You could also add those flags to Makefile.target in the SOLARIS specific areas, which would probably make more sense. As Martin indicated, setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH may get you a running binary, but LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the wrong answer for Solaris. Ben LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the wrong answer for Solaris ??? --- Weak statement. LD_LIBRARY_PATH is the wrong answer for Solaris. It's great for trying to fix problems like this when the app won't run with a particular set of libraries, or you're testing with new libraries and you don't want to recompile (I've done this before). Too many people use it as a panacea for poorly compiled/configured Open source software. In this case, he might just set the LD_LIBRARY_PATH and never recompile it, even though it won't work if it uses the default LIB path. No further comment, except this one: bash-3.00# pwd /opt/SUNWqemu/bin bash-3.00# ls -al total 676 dr-xr-xr-x 5 root bin 1024 Oct 14 06:26 . drwxr-xr-x 5 root bin 512 Oct 14 06:26 .. lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 9 Oct 14 06:26 JQEMU.jar - jqemu.jar lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 10 Oct 14 06:26 JQEMU.jnlp - jqemu.jnlp lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Oct 14 06:26 SWING-LAYOUT-1.0.jar - swing-layout-1.0.jar -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 48 Oct 14 03:23 jqemu-launcher-gui -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 150854 Oct 14 03:30 jqemu.jar -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 524 Oct 14 03:32 jqemu.jnlp lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 18 Oct 14 06:26 qemu - ./sparcv8plus/qemu lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 22 Oct 14 06:26 qemu-img - ./sparcv8plus/qemu-img lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 Oct 14 06:26 qemu-system-586 - ./sparcv8plus/qemu-system-586 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 Oct 14 06:26 qemu-system-686 - ./sparcv8plus/qemu-system-686 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 Oct 14 06:26 qemu-system-arm - ./sparcv8plus/qemu-system-arm lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 30 Oct 14 06:26 qemu-system-mips - ./sparcv8plus/qemu-system-mips lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Oct 14 06:26 qemu-system-mipsel - ./sparcv8plus/qemu-system-mipsel lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 29 Oct 14 06:26 qemu-system-ppc - ./sparcv8plus/qemu-system-ppc lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 Oct 14 06:26 qemu-system-sparc - ./sparcv8plus/qemu-system-sparc lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 32 Oct 14 06:26 qemu-system-x86_64 - ./sparcv8plus/qemu-system-x86_64 -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 1591 Oct 14 00:00 sdl-config dr-xr-xr-x 2 root bin 512 Oct 14 06:26 sparcv7 dr-xr-xr-x 2 root bin 512 Oct 14 06:26 sparcv8 dr-xr-xr-x 2 root bin 512 Oct 14 06:26 sparcv8plus -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 140545 Oct 14 03:30 swing-layout-1.0.jar -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 332 Oct 14 05:39 test-qemu -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 252 Oct 14 05:40 test-qemu-system-arm -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 887 Oct 14 04:49 test-qemu-system-mips -r-xr-xr-x 1 root bin 319 Oct 14 04:54 test-qemu-system-sparc bash-3.00# ldd */qemu-system-mips|grep SDL libSDL-1.2.so.0 = /opt/SUNWqemu/lib/sparcv7/libSDL-1.2.so.0 libSDL-1.2.so.0 = /opt/SUNWqemu/lib/sparcv8/libSDL-1.2.so.0 libSDL-1.2.so.0 = /opt/SUNWqemu/lib/sparcv8plus/libSDL-1.2.so.0 bash-3.00# ldd */qemu-system-mips|grep libz libz.so = /opt/SUNWqemu/lib/sparcv7/libz.so libz.so = /opt/SUNWqemu/lib/sparcv8/libz.so libz.so = /opt/SUNWqemu/lib/sparcv8plus/libz.so bash-3.00# uname -a SunOS mb1x-ws1 5.11 snv_41 sun4u sparc SUNW,Sun-Fire-280R bash-3.00# isainfo -v 64-bit sparcv9 applications vis2 vis 32-bit sparc applications vis2 vis v8plus div32 mul32
[Qemu-devel] SUNWqemu-0.8.2, REV=2006.10.14-sol8-sparc-opt.pkg released
Martin Bochnig wrote: Hello, uploading gdiff and sparc-pkg to www.martux.org/qemu/RELEASES/sparc and to the opensolaris site. In a few minutes. Ouch, file too big: File 1 (SUNWqemu-0.8.2,REV=2006.10.14-sol8-sparc-opt.pkg.gz) was ignored. The file size is 28080k, which exceeds the maximum size of 15360k. Cannot be uploaded to http://opensolaris.org/os/project/qemu/downloads Please download the file(s) from http://www.martux.org/qemu/RELEASES/sparc/ http://www.martux.org/qemu/RELEASES/sparc/SUNWqemu-0.8.2,REV=2006.10.14-sol8-sparc-opt.pkg.gz http://www.martux.org/qemu/RELEASES/sparc/qemu-0.8.2-solaris__20061002mon__EricL__versus__qemu-0.8.2-solaris__20061013fri__MB.gdiff http://www.martux.org/qemu/RELEASES/sparc/qemu-0.8.2__default_FabriceB__versus__qemu-0.8.2-solaris__20061013fri__MB.gdiff for now. See the diffs for added features. Attention: IDE-Patch is derived from old IDE patch written by grand-master Juergen Keil, who once achieved the major part of porting QEMU to Solaris (!) back in 2004 . He submitted that ide.c patch over a year ago, but it never made it into CVS for some odd reason. Regards -- Martin Bochnig http://www.martux.org/RELEASES/x86_and_x64/DVD/ (amd64) http://www.genunix.org/distributions/martux/marTux_0.2/(sparcv9) Generating x86 pkg till Sunday. (port down to Sol8-i386 has to be polished up) Regards, Martin ___ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
