Re: [PATCH 0/2] not use multifd during postcopy

2020-01-09 Thread Wei Yang
On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 10:50:25AM +0100, Juan Quintela wrote:
>Wei Yang  wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 10:35:39AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>>>Would this one be picked up this time?
>>
>> Happy new year to all.
>>
>> Can I ask the plan for this patch set?
>
>queued
>

Thanks :-)

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me



Re: [PATCH 0/2] not use multifd during postcopy

2020-01-09 Thread Juan Quintela
Wei Yang  wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 10:35:39AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>>Would this one be picked up this time?
>
> Happy new year to all.
>
> Can I ask the plan for this patch set?

queued

>
>>
>>On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 07:19:58AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>>>We don't support multifd during postcopy, but user still could enable
>>>both multifd and postcopy. This leads to migration failure.
>>>
>>>Patch 1 does proper cleanup, otherwise we may have data corruption.
>>>Patch 2 does the main job.
>>>
>>>BTW, current multifd synchronization method needs a cleanup. Will send 
>>>another
>>>patch set.
>>>
>>>Wei Yang (2):
>>>  migration/multifd: clean pages after filling packet
>>>  migration/multifd: not use multifd during postcopy
>>>
>>> migration/ram.c | 15 ++-
>>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>
>>>-- 
>>>2.17.1
>>
>>-- 
>>Wei Yang
>>Help you, Help me




Re: [PATCH 0/2] not use multifd during postcopy

2020-01-05 Thread Wei Yang
On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 10:35:39AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>Would this one be picked up this time?

Happy new year to all.

Can I ask the plan for this patch set?

>
>On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 07:19:58AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>>We don't support multifd during postcopy, but user still could enable
>>both multifd and postcopy. This leads to migration failure.
>>
>>Patch 1 does proper cleanup, otherwise we may have data corruption.
>>Patch 2 does the main job.
>>
>>BTW, current multifd synchronization method needs a cleanup. Will send another
>>patch set.
>>
>>Wei Yang (2):
>>  migration/multifd: clean pages after filling packet
>>  migration/multifd: not use multifd during postcopy
>>
>> migration/ram.c | 15 ++-
>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>>-- 
>>2.17.1
>
>-- 
>Wei Yang
>Help you, Help me

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me



Re: [PATCH 0/2] not use multifd during postcopy

2019-12-15 Thread Wei Yang
Would this one be picked up this time?

On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 07:19:58AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>We don't support multifd during postcopy, but user still could enable
>both multifd and postcopy. This leads to migration failure.
>
>Patch 1 does proper cleanup, otherwise we may have data corruption.
>Patch 2 does the main job.
>
>BTW, current multifd synchronization method needs a cleanup. Will send another
>patch set.
>
>Wei Yang (2):
>  migration/multifd: clean pages after filling packet
>  migration/multifd: not use multifd during postcopy
>
> migration/ram.c | 15 ++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
>-- 
>2.17.1

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me



Re: [PATCH 0/2] not use multifd during postcopy

2019-11-17 Thread Wei Yang
Ping for comments.

On Sat, Oct 26, 2019 at 07:19:58AM +0800, Wei Yang wrote:
>We don't support multifd during postcopy, but user still could enable
>both multifd and postcopy. This leads to migration failure.
>
>Patch 1 does proper cleanup, otherwise we may have data corruption.
>Patch 2 does the main job.
>
>BTW, current multifd synchronization method needs a cleanup. Will send another
>patch set.
>
>Wei Yang (2):
>  migration/multifd: clean pages after filling packet
>  migration/multifd: not use multifd during postcopy
>
> migration/ram.c | 15 ++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
>-- 
>2.17.1

-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me



[PATCH 0/2] not use multifd during postcopy

2019-10-25 Thread Wei Yang
We don't support multifd during postcopy, but user still could enable
both multifd and postcopy. This leads to migration failure.

Patch 1 does proper cleanup, otherwise we may have data corruption.
Patch 2 does the main job.

BTW, current multifd synchronization method needs a cleanup. Will send another
patch set.

Wei Yang (2):
  migration/multifd: clean pages after filling packet
  migration/multifd: not use multifd during postcopy

 migration/ram.c | 15 ++-
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

-- 
2.17.1