Re: [PATCH v2 03/22] migration/block-dirty-bitmap: rename dirty_bitmap_mig_cleanup

2020-07-23 Thread Eric Blake

On 2/19/20 8:20 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:

18.02.2020 14:00, Andrey Shinkevich wrote:

On 17/02/2020 18:02, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:

Rename dirty_bitmap_mig_cleanup to dirty_bitmap_do_save_cleanup, to
stress that it is on save part.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy 
---
  migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c | 8 
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)




At the next opportunity, I would suggest the name like
"dirty_bitmap_do_clean_after_saving()"
and similar for dirty_bitmap_save_cleanup()
"dirty_bitmap_clean_after_saving()".


I'd keep my naming, it corresponds to .save_cleanup handler name.


I'm fine with that explanation, so no need to rename again.

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake 





Reviewed-by: Andrey Shinkevich 





--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.   +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org




Re: [PATCH v2 03/22] migration/block-dirty-bitmap: rename dirty_bitmap_mig_cleanup

2020-02-19 Thread Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy

18.02.2020 14:00, Andrey Shinkevich wrote:

On 17/02/2020 18:02, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:

Rename dirty_bitmap_mig_cleanup to dirty_bitmap_do_save_cleanup, to
stress that it is on save part.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy 
---
  migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c | 8 
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c b/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c
index 73792ab005..4e8959ae52 100644
--- a/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c
+++ b/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ static void send_bitmap_bits(QEMUFile *f, SaveBitmapState 
*dbms,
  }
  /* Called with iothread lock taken.  */
-static void dirty_bitmap_mig_cleanup(void)
+static void dirty_bitmap_do_save_cleanup(void)
  {
  SaveBitmapState *dbms;
@@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ static int init_dirty_bitmap_migration(void)
  return 0;
  fail:
-    dirty_bitmap_mig_cleanup();
+    dirty_bitmap_do_save_cleanup();
  return -1;
  }
@@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ static void bulk_phase(QEMUFile *f, bool limit)
  /* for SaveVMHandlers */
  static void dirty_bitmap_save_cleanup(void *opaque)
  {
-    dirty_bitmap_mig_cleanup();
+    dirty_bitmap_do_save_cleanup();
  }
  static int dirty_bitmap_save_iterate(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque)
@@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ static int dirty_bitmap_save_complete(QEMUFile *f, void 
*opaque)
  trace_dirty_bitmap_save_complete_finish();
-    dirty_bitmap_mig_cleanup();
+    dirty_bitmap_do_save_cleanup();
  return 0;
  }



At the next opportunity, I would suggest the name like
"dirty_bitmap_do_clean_after_saving()"
and similar for dirty_bitmap_save_cleanup()
"dirty_bitmap_clean_after_saving()".


I'd keep my naming, it corresponds to .save_cleanup handler name.



Reviewed-by: Andrey Shinkevich 



--
Best regards,
Vladimir



Re: [PATCH v2 03/22] migration/block-dirty-bitmap: rename dirty_bitmap_mig_cleanup

2020-02-18 Thread Andrey Shinkevich

On 17/02/2020 18:02, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:

Rename dirty_bitmap_mig_cleanup to dirty_bitmap_do_save_cleanup, to
stress that it is on save part.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy 
---
  migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c | 8 
  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c b/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c
index 73792ab005..4e8959ae52 100644
--- a/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c
+++ b/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ static void send_bitmap_bits(QEMUFile *f, SaveBitmapState 
*dbms,
  }
  
  /* Called with iothread lock taken.  */

-static void dirty_bitmap_mig_cleanup(void)
+static void dirty_bitmap_do_save_cleanup(void)
  {
  SaveBitmapState *dbms;
  
@@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ static int init_dirty_bitmap_migration(void)

  return 0;
  
  fail:

-dirty_bitmap_mig_cleanup();
+dirty_bitmap_do_save_cleanup();
  
  return -1;

  }
@@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ static void bulk_phase(QEMUFile *f, bool limit)
  /* for SaveVMHandlers */
  static void dirty_bitmap_save_cleanup(void *opaque)
  {
-dirty_bitmap_mig_cleanup();
+dirty_bitmap_do_save_cleanup();
  }
  
  static int dirty_bitmap_save_iterate(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque)

@@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ static int dirty_bitmap_save_complete(QEMUFile *f, void 
*opaque)
  
  trace_dirty_bitmap_save_complete_finish();
  
-dirty_bitmap_mig_cleanup();

+dirty_bitmap_do_save_cleanup();
  return 0;
  }
  



At the next opportunity, I would suggest the name like
"dirty_bitmap_do_clean_after_saving()"
and similar for dirty_bitmap_save_cleanup()
"dirty_bitmap_clean_after_saving()".

Reviewed-by: Andrey Shinkevich 
--
With the best regards,
Andrey Shinkevich



[PATCH v2 03/22] migration/block-dirty-bitmap: rename dirty_bitmap_mig_cleanup

2020-02-17 Thread Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Rename dirty_bitmap_mig_cleanup to dirty_bitmap_do_save_cleanup, to
stress that it is on save part.

Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy 
---
 migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c | 8 
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c b/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c
index 73792ab005..4e8959ae52 100644
--- a/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c
+++ b/migration/block-dirty-bitmap.c
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ static void send_bitmap_bits(QEMUFile *f, SaveBitmapState 
*dbms,
 }
 
 /* Called with iothread lock taken.  */
-static void dirty_bitmap_mig_cleanup(void)
+static void dirty_bitmap_do_save_cleanup(void)
 {
 SaveBitmapState *dbms;
 
@@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ static int init_dirty_bitmap_migration(void)
 return 0;
 
 fail:
-dirty_bitmap_mig_cleanup();
+dirty_bitmap_do_save_cleanup();
 
 return -1;
 }
@@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ static void bulk_phase(QEMUFile *f, bool limit)
 /* for SaveVMHandlers */
 static void dirty_bitmap_save_cleanup(void *opaque)
 {
-dirty_bitmap_mig_cleanup();
+dirty_bitmap_do_save_cleanup();
 }
 
 static int dirty_bitmap_save_iterate(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque)
@@ -412,7 +412,7 @@ static int dirty_bitmap_save_complete(QEMUFile *f, void 
*opaque)
 
 trace_dirty_bitmap_save_complete_finish();
 
-dirty_bitmap_mig_cleanup();
+dirty_bitmap_do_save_cleanup();
 return 0;
 }
 
-- 
2.21.0