Re: [PATCH v6 16/18] s390x: Add unpack facility feature to GA1

2020-03-06 Thread David Hildenbrand
On 06.03.20 11:14, Janosch Frank wrote:
> On 3/4/20 12:42 PM, Janosch Frank wrote:
>> From: Christian Borntraeger 
>>
>> The unpack facility is an indication that diagnose 308 subcodes 8-10
>> are available to the guest. That means, that the guest can put itself
>> into protected mode.
>>
>> Once it is in protected mode, the hardware stops any attempt of VM
>> introspection by the hypervisor.
>>
>> Some features are currently not supported in protected mode:
>>  * Passthrough devices
>>  * Migration
>>  * Huge page backings
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger 
> 
> This one will be the first patch (after sync) and will also get the
> DEF_FEAT definition, so I can use it in the diag 308 8-10 patch

You should still enable the whole machinery only after everything has
been implemented. Moving the feature is fine.


-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb




Re: [PATCH v6 16/18] s390x: Add unpack facility feature to GA1

2020-03-06 Thread Janosch Frank
On 3/4/20 12:42 PM, Janosch Frank wrote:
> From: Christian Borntraeger 
> 
> The unpack facility is an indication that diagnose 308 subcodes 8-10
> are available to the guest. That means, that the guest can put itself
> into protected mode.
> 
> Once it is in protected mode, the hardware stops any attempt of VM
> introspection by the hypervisor.
> 
> Some features are currently not supported in protected mode:
>  * Passthrough devices
>  * Migration
>  * Huge page backings
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger 

This one will be the first patch (after sync) and will also get the
DEF_FEAT definition, so I can use it in the diag 308 8-10 patch


> ---
>  target/s390x/gen-features.c | 1 +
>  target/s390x/kvm.c  | 5 +
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/target/s390x/gen-features.c b/target/s390x/gen-features.c
> index 6278845b12..8ddeebc544 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/gen-features.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/gen-features.c
> @@ -562,6 +562,7 @@ static uint16_t full_GEN15_GA1[] = {
>  S390_FEAT_GROUP_MSA_EXT_9,
>  S390_FEAT_GROUP_MSA_EXT_9_PCKMO,
>  S390_FEAT_ETOKEN,
> +S390_FEAT_UNPACK,
>  };
>  
>  /* Default features (in order of release)
> diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c
> index a4cbdc5fc6..bf807793bc 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/kvm.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c
> @@ -2396,6 +2396,11 @@ void kvm_s390_get_host_cpu_model(S390CPUModel *model, 
> Error **errp)
>  clear_bit(S390_FEAT_BPB, model->features);
>  }
>  
> +/* we do have the IPL enhancements */
> +if (cap_protected) {
> +set_bit(S390_FEAT_UNPACK, model->features);
> +}
> +
>  /* We emulate a zPCI bus and AEN, therefore we don't need HW support */
>  set_bit(S390_FEAT_ZPCI, model->features);
>  set_bit(S390_FEAT_ADAPTER_EVENT_NOTIFICATION, model->features);
> 




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [PATCH v6 16/18] s390x: Add unpack facility feature to GA1

2020-03-04 Thread David Hildenbrand
On 04.03.20 12:42, Janosch Frank wrote:
> From: Christian Borntraeger 
> 
> The unpack facility is an indication that diagnose 308 subcodes 8-10
> are available to the guest. That means, that the guest can put itself
> into protected mode.
> 
> Once it is in protected mode, the hardware stops any attempt of VM
> introspection by the hypervisor.
> 
> Some features are currently not supported in protected mode:
>  * Passthrough devices
>  * Migration
>  * Huge page backings
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger 
> ---
>  target/s390x/gen-features.c | 1 +
>  target/s390x/kvm.c  | 5 +
>  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/target/s390x/gen-features.c b/target/s390x/gen-features.c
> index 6278845b12..8ddeebc544 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/gen-features.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/gen-features.c
> @@ -562,6 +562,7 @@ static uint16_t full_GEN15_GA1[] = {
>  S390_FEAT_GROUP_MSA_EXT_9,
>  S390_FEAT_GROUP_MSA_EXT_9_PCKMO,
>  S390_FEAT_ETOKEN,
> +S390_FEAT_UNPACK,
>  };
>  
>  /* Default features (in order of release)
> diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c
> index a4cbdc5fc6..bf807793bc 100644
> --- a/target/s390x/kvm.c
> +++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c
> @@ -2396,6 +2396,11 @@ void kvm_s390_get_host_cpu_model(S390CPUModel *model, 
> Error **errp)
>  clear_bit(S390_FEAT_BPB, model->features);
>  }
>  
> +/* we do have the IPL enhancements */
> +if (cap_protected) {
> +set_bit(S390_FEAT_UNPACK, model->features);
> +}
> +
>  /* We emulate a zPCI bus and AEN, therefore we don't need HW support */
>  set_bit(S390_FEAT_ZPCI, model->features);
>  set_bit(S390_FEAT_ADAPTER_EVENT_NOTIFICATION, model->features);
> 

Reviewed-by: David Hildenbrand 

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb




[PATCH v6 16/18] s390x: Add unpack facility feature to GA1

2020-03-04 Thread Janosch Frank
From: Christian Borntraeger 

The unpack facility is an indication that diagnose 308 subcodes 8-10
are available to the guest. That means, that the guest can put itself
into protected mode.

Once it is in protected mode, the hardware stops any attempt of VM
introspection by the hypervisor.

Some features are currently not supported in protected mode:
 * Passthrough devices
 * Migration
 * Huge page backings

Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger 
---
 target/s390x/gen-features.c | 1 +
 target/s390x/kvm.c  | 5 +
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/target/s390x/gen-features.c b/target/s390x/gen-features.c
index 6278845b12..8ddeebc544 100644
--- a/target/s390x/gen-features.c
+++ b/target/s390x/gen-features.c
@@ -562,6 +562,7 @@ static uint16_t full_GEN15_GA1[] = {
 S390_FEAT_GROUP_MSA_EXT_9,
 S390_FEAT_GROUP_MSA_EXT_9_PCKMO,
 S390_FEAT_ETOKEN,
+S390_FEAT_UNPACK,
 };
 
 /* Default features (in order of release)
diff --git a/target/s390x/kvm.c b/target/s390x/kvm.c
index a4cbdc5fc6..bf807793bc 100644
--- a/target/s390x/kvm.c
+++ b/target/s390x/kvm.c
@@ -2396,6 +2396,11 @@ void kvm_s390_get_host_cpu_model(S390CPUModel *model, 
Error **errp)
 clear_bit(S390_FEAT_BPB, model->features);
 }
 
+/* we do have the IPL enhancements */
+if (cap_protected) {
+set_bit(S390_FEAT_UNPACK, model->features);
+}
+
 /* We emulate a zPCI bus and AEN, therefore we don't need HW support */
 set_bit(S390_FEAT_ZPCI, model->features);
 set_bit(S390_FEAT_ADAPTER_EVENT_NOTIFICATION, model->features);
-- 
2.20.1