Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/31] block: Make bdrv_round_to_clusters() signature more useful
On 04/26/2017 05:47 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > On 04/26/2017 04:41 PM, John Snow wrote: >> >> >> On 04/17/2017 09:33 PM, Eric Blake wrote: >>> In the process of converting sector-based interfaces to bytes, >>> I'm finding it easier to represent a byte count as a 64-bit >>> integer at the block layer (even if we are internally capped >>> by SIZE_MAX or even INT_MAX for individual transactions, it's >>> still nicer to not have to worry about truncation/overflow >>> issues on as many variables). Update the signature of >>> bdrv_round_to_clusters() to uniformly use uint64_t, matching >> >> >> While we're here, since you went with int64_t in the end, what steered >> you away from uint64_t, or was that just a thinko? > > Later patches were made easier with signed (the compiler complained when > I mixed signed and unsigned pointers). > >> >> (AFAICT: off_t is usually something like int64_t, so your choice makes >> sense to me, generally.) > > Indeed, and that's something I should update my commit message to mention. > >> >> --js >> >>> the signature already chosen for bdrv_is_allocated, and >>> adjust clients according to the required fallout. > > If you want me to try and use uint64_t *pnum instead of int64_t *pnum > throughout both my series 1 (the changes to bdrv_is_allocated) and this > one, it will take more effort. I'll do it if there's a reason, but I'd > rather not if the signed version is good enough. > No, I didn't mean to imply you should, I was just pointing out the commit message typo. int64_t is likely the correct choice for a number of reasons, at least being able to return -1 from functions returning a byte offset being the chief reason. --js signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/31] block: Make bdrv_round_to_clusters() signature more useful
On 04/26/2017 04:41 PM, John Snow wrote: > > > On 04/17/2017 09:33 PM, Eric Blake wrote: >> In the process of converting sector-based interfaces to bytes, >> I'm finding it easier to represent a byte count as a 64-bit >> integer at the block layer (even if we are internally capped >> by SIZE_MAX or even INT_MAX for individual transactions, it's >> still nicer to not have to worry about truncation/overflow >> issues on as many variables). Update the signature of >> bdrv_round_to_clusters() to uniformly use uint64_t, matching > > > While we're here, since you went with int64_t in the end, what steered > you away from uint64_t, or was that just a thinko? Later patches were made easier with signed (the compiler complained when I mixed signed and unsigned pointers). > > (AFAICT: off_t is usually something like int64_t, so your choice makes > sense to me, generally.) Indeed, and that's something I should update my commit message to mention. > > --js > >> the signature already chosen for bdrv_is_allocated, and >> adjust clients according to the required fallout. If you want me to try and use uint64_t *pnum instead of int64_t *pnum throughout both my series 1 (the changes to bdrv_is_allocated) and this one, it will take more effort. I'll do it if there's a reason, but I'd rather not if the signed version is good enough. -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/31] block: Make bdrv_round_to_clusters() signature more useful
On 04/17/2017 09:33 PM, Eric Blake wrote: > In the process of converting sector-based interfaces to bytes, > I'm finding it easier to represent a byte count as a 64-bit > integer at the block layer (even if we are internally capped > by SIZE_MAX or even INT_MAX for individual transactions, it's > still nicer to not have to worry about truncation/overflow > issues on as many variables). Update the signature of > bdrv_round_to_clusters() to uniformly use uint64_t, matching While we're here, since you went with int64_t in the end, what steered you away from uint64_t, or was that just a thinko? (AFAICT: off_t is usually something like int64_t, so your choice makes sense to me, generally.) --js > the signature already chosen for bdrv_is_allocated, and > adjust clients according to the required fallout. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Blake> --- > include/block/block.h | 4 ++-- > block/io.c| 7 --- > block/mirror.c| 9 - > block/trace-events| 2 +- > 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/block/block.h b/include/block/block.h > index 86ad511..eed1330 100644 > --- a/include/block/block.h > +++ b/include/block/block.h > @@ -468,9 +468,9 @@ int bdrv_get_flags(BlockDriverState *bs); > int bdrv_get_info(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockDriverInfo *bdi); > ImageInfoSpecific *bdrv_get_specific_info(BlockDriverState *bs); > void bdrv_round_to_clusters(BlockDriverState *bs, > -int64_t offset, unsigned int bytes, > +int64_t offset, int64_t bytes, > int64_t *cluster_offset, > -unsigned int *cluster_bytes); > +int64_t *cluster_bytes); > > const char *bdrv_get_encrypted_filename(BlockDriverState *bs); > void bdrv_get_backing_filename(BlockDriverState *bs, > diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c > index d61a906..07165dc 100644 > --- a/block/io.c > +++ b/block/io.c > @@ -422,9 +422,9 @@ static void mark_request_serialising(BdrvTrackedRequest > *req, uint64_t align) > * Round a region to cluster boundaries > */ > void bdrv_round_to_clusters(BlockDriverState *bs, > -int64_t offset, unsigned int bytes, > +int64_t offset, int64_t bytes, > int64_t *cluster_offset, > -unsigned int *cluster_bytes) > +int64_t *cluster_bytes) > { > BlockDriverInfo bdi; > > @@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn > bdrv_co_do_copy_on_readv(BdrvChild *child, > struct iovec iov; > QEMUIOVector bounce_qiov; > int64_t cluster_offset; > -unsigned int cluster_bytes; > +int64_t cluster_bytes; > size_t skip_bytes; > int ret; > > @@ -941,6 +941,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn > bdrv_co_do_copy_on_readv(BdrvChild *child, > trace_bdrv_co_do_copy_on_readv(bs, offset, bytes, > cluster_offset, cluster_bytes); > > +assert(cluster_bytes < SIZE_MAX); > iov.iov_len = cluster_bytes; > iov.iov_base = bounce_buffer = qemu_try_blockalign(bs, iov.iov_len); > if (bounce_buffer == NULL) { > diff --git a/block/mirror.c b/block/mirror.c > index 846e392..2510793 100644 > --- a/block/mirror.c > +++ b/block/mirror.c > @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static void mirror_read_complete(void *opaque, int ret) > /* Clip bytes relative to offset to not exceed end-of-file */ > static inline void mirror_clip_bytes(MirrorBlockJob *s, > int64_t offset, > - unsigned int *bytes) > + int64_t *bytes) > { > *bytes = MIN(*bytes, s->bdev_length - offset); > } > @@ -190,10 +190,9 @@ static int mirror_cow_align(MirrorBlockJob *s, int64_t > *offset, > bool need_cow; > int ret = 0; > int64_t align_offset = *offset; > -unsigned int align_bytes = *bytes; > +int64_t align_bytes = *bytes; > int max_bytes = s->granularity * s->max_iov; > > -assert(*bytes < INT_MAX); > need_cow = !test_bit(*offset / s->granularity, s->cow_bitmap); > need_cow |= !test_bit((*offset + *bytes - 1) / s->granularity, >s->cow_bitmap); > @@ -384,7 +383,7 @@ static uint64_t coroutine_fn > mirror_iteration(MirrorBlockJob *s) > while (nb_chunks > 0 && offset < s->bdev_length) { > int64_t ret; > int io_sectors; > -unsigned int io_bytes; > +int64_t io_bytes; > int64_t io_bytes_acct; > BlockDriverState *file; > enum MirrorMethod { > @@ -410,7 +409,7 @@ static uint64_t coroutine_fn > mirror_iteration(MirrorBlockJob *s) > io_bytes = s->granularity; > } else if (ret >= 0 && !(ret & BDRV_BLOCK_DATA)) { > int64_t target_offset; > -
[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/31] block: Make bdrv_round_to_clusters() signature more useful
In the process of converting sector-based interfaces to bytes, I'm finding it easier to represent a byte count as a 64-bit integer at the block layer (even if we are internally capped by SIZE_MAX or even INT_MAX for individual transactions, it's still nicer to not have to worry about truncation/overflow issues on as many variables). Update the signature of bdrv_round_to_clusters() to uniformly use uint64_t, matching the signature already chosen for bdrv_is_allocated, and adjust clients according to the required fallout. Signed-off-by: Eric Blake--- include/block/block.h | 4 ++-- block/io.c| 7 --- block/mirror.c| 9 - block/trace-events| 2 +- 4 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/block/block.h b/include/block/block.h index 86ad511..eed1330 100644 --- a/include/block/block.h +++ b/include/block/block.h @@ -468,9 +468,9 @@ int bdrv_get_flags(BlockDriverState *bs); int bdrv_get_info(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockDriverInfo *bdi); ImageInfoSpecific *bdrv_get_specific_info(BlockDriverState *bs); void bdrv_round_to_clusters(BlockDriverState *bs, -int64_t offset, unsigned int bytes, +int64_t offset, int64_t bytes, int64_t *cluster_offset, -unsigned int *cluster_bytes); +int64_t *cluster_bytes); const char *bdrv_get_encrypted_filename(BlockDriverState *bs); void bdrv_get_backing_filename(BlockDriverState *bs, diff --git a/block/io.c b/block/io.c index d61a906..07165dc 100644 --- a/block/io.c +++ b/block/io.c @@ -422,9 +422,9 @@ static void mark_request_serialising(BdrvTrackedRequest *req, uint64_t align) * Round a region to cluster boundaries */ void bdrv_round_to_clusters(BlockDriverState *bs, -int64_t offset, unsigned int bytes, +int64_t offset, int64_t bytes, int64_t *cluster_offset, -unsigned int *cluster_bytes) +int64_t *cluster_bytes) { BlockDriverInfo bdi; @@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_do_copy_on_readv(BdrvChild *child, struct iovec iov; QEMUIOVector bounce_qiov; int64_t cluster_offset; -unsigned int cluster_bytes; +int64_t cluster_bytes; size_t skip_bytes; int ret; @@ -941,6 +941,7 @@ static int coroutine_fn bdrv_co_do_copy_on_readv(BdrvChild *child, trace_bdrv_co_do_copy_on_readv(bs, offset, bytes, cluster_offset, cluster_bytes); +assert(cluster_bytes < SIZE_MAX); iov.iov_len = cluster_bytes; iov.iov_base = bounce_buffer = qemu_try_blockalign(bs, iov.iov_len); if (bounce_buffer == NULL) { diff --git a/block/mirror.c b/block/mirror.c index 846e392..2510793 100644 --- a/block/mirror.c +++ b/block/mirror.c @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static void mirror_read_complete(void *opaque, int ret) /* Clip bytes relative to offset to not exceed end-of-file */ static inline void mirror_clip_bytes(MirrorBlockJob *s, int64_t offset, - unsigned int *bytes) + int64_t *bytes) { *bytes = MIN(*bytes, s->bdev_length - offset); } @@ -190,10 +190,9 @@ static int mirror_cow_align(MirrorBlockJob *s, int64_t *offset, bool need_cow; int ret = 0; int64_t align_offset = *offset; -unsigned int align_bytes = *bytes; +int64_t align_bytes = *bytes; int max_bytes = s->granularity * s->max_iov; -assert(*bytes < INT_MAX); need_cow = !test_bit(*offset / s->granularity, s->cow_bitmap); need_cow |= !test_bit((*offset + *bytes - 1) / s->granularity, s->cow_bitmap); @@ -384,7 +383,7 @@ static uint64_t coroutine_fn mirror_iteration(MirrorBlockJob *s) while (nb_chunks > 0 && offset < s->bdev_length) { int64_t ret; int io_sectors; -unsigned int io_bytes; +int64_t io_bytes; int64_t io_bytes_acct; BlockDriverState *file; enum MirrorMethod { @@ -410,7 +409,7 @@ static uint64_t coroutine_fn mirror_iteration(MirrorBlockJob *s) io_bytes = s->granularity; } else if (ret >= 0 && !(ret & BDRV_BLOCK_DATA)) { int64_t target_offset; -unsigned int target_bytes; +int64_t target_bytes; bdrv_round_to_clusters(blk_bs(s->target), offset, io_bytes, _offset, _bytes); if (target_offset == offset && diff --git a/block/trace-events b/block/trace-events index 04f6463..2301a50 100644 --- a/block/trace-events +++ b/block/trace-events @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ bdrv_aio_writev(void *bs, int64_t sector_num, int nb_sectors, void *opaque) "bs bdrv_co_readv(void *bs, int64_t sector_num, int nb_sector) "bs %p