On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 12:14:22PM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
Try to avoid conflicting with the outgoing function call arguments.
Signed-off-by: Richard Henderson r...@twiddle.net
---
tcg/s390/tcg-target.c | 23 +--
1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
This patch looks fine.
diff --git a/tcg/s390/tcg-target.c b/tcg/s390/tcg-target.c
index 95ea3c8..3944cb1 100644
--- a/tcg/s390/tcg-target.c
+++ b/tcg/s390/tcg-target.c
@@ -149,22 +149,25 @@ static const char * const
tcg_target_reg_names[TCG_TARGET_NB_REGS] = {
};
#endif
+/* Since R6 is a potential argument register, choose it last of the
+ call-saved registers. Likewise prefer the call-clobbered registers
+ in reverse order to maximize the chance of avoiding the arguments. */
static const int tcg_target_reg_alloc_order[] = {
-TCG_REG_R6,
-TCG_REG_R7,
-TCG_REG_R8,
-TCG_REG_R9,
-TCG_REG_R10,
-TCG_REG_R11,
-TCG_REG_R12,
TCG_REG_R13,
+TCG_REG_R12,
+TCG_REG_R11,
+TCG_REG_R10,
+TCG_REG_R9,
+TCG_REG_R8,
+TCG_REG_R7,
+TCG_REG_R6,
TCG_REG_R14,
TCG_REG_R0,
TCG_REG_R1,
-TCG_REG_R2,
-TCG_REG_R3,
-TCG_REG_R4,
TCG_REG_R5,
+TCG_REG_R4,
+TCG_REG_R3,
+TCG_REG_R2,
};
static const int tcg_target_call_iarg_regs[] = {
--
1.7.0.1
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net