Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/7] s390x/pci: rework PCI LOAD

2017-11-13 Thread Pierre Morel

On 09/11/2017 17:51, Cornelia Huck wrote:

On Tue,  7 Nov 2017 18:24:35 +0100
Pierre Morel  wrote:


Enhance the fault detection, correction of the fault reporting.


Basically the same comments as for the previous patch (but looks good
in general).


thanks I will process it the same way as patch 2/7 then.






Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel 
Reviewed-by: Yi Min Zhao 
---
  hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c | 27 ---
  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)





--
Pierre Morel
Linux/KVM/QEMU in Böblingen - Germany




Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/7] s390x/pci: rework PCI LOAD

2017-11-13 Thread Pierre Morel

On 09/11/2017 17:51, Cornelia Huck wrote:

On Tue,  7 Nov 2017 18:24:35 +0100
Pierre Morel  wrote:


Enhance the fault detection, correction of the fault reporting.


Basically the same comments as for the previous patch (but looks good
in general).


thanks I will process it the same way as patch 2 then.





Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel 
Reviewed-by: Yi Min Zhao 
---
  hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c | 27 ---
  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)





--
Pierre Morel
Linux/KVM/QEMU in Böblingen - Germany




Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/7] s390x/pci: rework PCI LOAD

2017-11-09 Thread Cornelia Huck
On Tue,  7 Nov 2017 18:24:35 +0100
Pierre Morel  wrote:

> Enhance the fault detection, correction of the fault reporting.

Basically the same comments as for the previous patch (but looks good
in general).

> 
> Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel 
> Reviewed-by: Yi Min Zhao 
> ---
>  hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c | 27 ---
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)



[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/7] s390x/pci: rework PCI LOAD

2017-11-07 Thread Pierre Morel
Enhance the fault detection, correction of the fault reporting.

Signed-off-by: Pierre Morel 
Reviewed-by: Yi Min Zhao 
---
 hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c | 27 ---
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c
index 4a2f996..62ebaa0 100644
--- a/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c
+++ b/hw/s390x/s390-pci-inst.c
@@ -372,6 +372,11 @@ int pcilg_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint8_t 
r2)
 len = env->regs[r2] & 0xf;
 offset = env->regs[r2 + 1];
 
+if (!(fh & FH_MASK_ENABLE)) {
+setcc(cpu, ZPCI_PCI_LS_INVAL_HANDLE);
+return 0;
+}
+
 pbdev = s390_pci_find_dev_by_fh(s390_get_phb(), fh);
 if (!pbdev) {
 DPRINTF("pcilg no pci dev\n");
@@ -380,12 +385,7 @@ int pcilg_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint8_t 
r2)
 }
 
 switch (pbdev->state) {
-case ZPCI_FS_RESERVED:
-case ZPCI_FS_STANDBY:
-case ZPCI_FS_DISABLED:
 case ZPCI_FS_PERMANENT_ERROR:
-setcc(cpu, ZPCI_PCI_LS_INVAL_HANDLE);
-return 0;
 case ZPCI_FS_ERROR:
 setcc(cpu, ZPCI_PCI_LS_ERR);
 s390_set_status_code(env, r2, ZPCI_PCI_ST_BLOCKED);
@@ -394,8 +394,9 @@ int pcilg_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint8_t r2)
 break;
 }
 
-if (pcias < 6) {
-if ((8 - (offset & 0x7)) < len) {
+switch (pcias) {
+case 0 ... 5:
+if (!len || (len > (8 - (offset & 0x7 {
 program_interrupt(env, PGM_OPERAND, 4);
 return 0;
 }
@@ -406,8 +407,9 @@ int pcilg_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint8_t r2)
 program_interrupt(env, PGM_OPERAND, 4);
 return 0;
 }
-} else if (pcias == 15) {
-if ((4 - (offset & 0x3)) < len) {
+break;
+case 15:
+if (!len || (len > (4 - (offset & 0x3))) || len == 3) {
 program_interrupt(env, PGM_OPERAND, 4);
 return 0;
 }
@@ -418,8 +420,11 @@ int pcilg_service_call(S390CPU *cpu, uint8_t r1, uint8_t 
r2)
 program_interrupt(env, PGM_OPERAND, 4);
 return 0;
 }
-} else {
-DPRINTF("invalid space\n");
+break;
+case PCI_ROM_SLOT:
+/* Fall through */
+default:
+DPRINTF("pcilg invalid space\n");
 setcc(cpu, ZPCI_PCI_LS_ERR);
 s390_set_status_code(env, r2, ZPCI_PCI_ST_INVAL_AS);
 return 0;
-- 
2.7.4