Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.0 1/3] block: continue until base is found in bdrv_freeze_backing_chain() et al

2019-03-28 Thread Alberto Garcia
On Thu 28 Mar 2019 11:33:55 AM CET, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> All three functions that handle the BdrvChild.frozen attribute walk
>>> the backing chain from 'bs' to 'base' and stop either when 'base' is
>>> found or at the end of the chain if 'base' is NULL.
>>>
>>> However if 'base' is not found then the functions return without
>>> errors as if it was NULL.
>>>
>>> This is wrong: if the caller passed an incorrect parameter that means
>>> that there is a bug in the code.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Alberto Garcia 
>> 
>> interesting that bdrv_is_allocated_above has the same flaw. Could you
>> fix it too?
>
> However bdrv_is_allocated_above is differs from your functions, as it
> may yield.. And graph may change while it is running.. Shouldn't we
> freeze backing chain every time we want to call
> bdrv_is_allocated_above?

I think all callers of bdrv_is_allocated_above() already freeze the
chain themselves? Anyway I would not change this for 4.0 without an
actual bug.

Berto



Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.0 1/3] block: continue until base is found in bdrv_freeze_backing_chain() et al

2019-03-28 Thread Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
28.03.2019 13:27, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> 26.03.2019 20:07, Alberto Garcia wrote:
>> All three functions that handle the BdrvChild.frozen attribute walk
>> the backing chain from 'bs' to 'base' and stop either when 'base' is
>> found or at the end of the chain if 'base' is NULL.
>>
>> However if 'base' is not found then the functions return without
>> errors as if it was NULL.
>>
>> This is wrong: if the caller passed an incorrect parameter that means
>> that there is a bug in the code.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alberto Garcia 
> 
> interesting that bdrv_is_allocated_above has the same flaw. Could you fix it 
> too?

However bdrv_is_allocated_above is differs from your functions, as it may 
yield.. And
graph may change while it is running.. Shouldn't we freeze backing chain every 
time
we want to call bdrv_is_allocated_above?

> 
>> ---
>>   block.c | 21 ++---
>>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
>> index 0a93ee9ac8..3050854528 100644
>> --- a/block.c
>> +++ b/block.c
>> @@ -4218,14 +4218,15 @@ BlockDriverState *bdrv_find_base(BlockDriverState 
>> *bs)
>>   /*
>>    * Return true if at least one of the backing links between @bs and
>>    * @base is frozen. @errp is set if that's the case.
>> + * @base must be reachable from @bs, or NULL.
>>    */
>>   bool bdrv_is_backing_chain_frozen(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockDriverState 
>> *base,
>>     Error **errp)
>>   {
>>   BlockDriverState *i;
>> -    for (i = bs; i != base && i->backing; i = backing_bs(i)) {
>> -    if (i->backing->frozen) {
>> +    for (i = bs; i != base; i = backing_bs(i)) {
>> +    if (i->backing && i->backing->frozen) {
>>   error_setg(errp, "Cannot change '%s' link from '%s' to '%s'",
>>  i->backing->name, i->node_name,
>>  backing_bs(i)->node_name);
>> @@ -4240,6 +4241,7 @@ bool bdrv_is_backing_chain_frozen(BlockDriverState 
>> *bs, BlockDriverState *base,
>>    * Freeze all backing links between @bs and @base.
>>    * If any of the links is already frozen the operation is aborted and
>>    * none of the links are modified.
>> + * @base must be reachable from @bs, or NULL.
>>    * Returns 0 on success. On failure returns < 0 and sets @errp.
>>    */
>>   int bdrv_freeze_backing_chain(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockDriverState *base,
>> @@ -4251,8 +4253,10 @@ int bdrv_freeze_backing_chain(BlockDriverState *bs, 
>> BlockDriverState *base,
>>   return -EPERM;
>>   }
>> -    for (i = bs; i != base && i->backing; i = backing_bs(i)) {
>> -    i->backing->frozen = true;
>> +    for (i = bs; i != base; i = backing_bs(i)) {
>> +    if (i->backing) {
>> +    i->backing->frozen = true;
>> +    }
>>   }
>>   return 0;
>> @@ -4261,14 +4265,17 @@ int bdrv_freeze_backing_chain(BlockDriverState *bs, 
>> BlockDriverState *base,
>>   /*
>>    * Unfreeze all backing links between @bs and @base. The caller must
>>    * ensure that all links are frozen before using this function.
>> + * @base must be reachable from @bs, or NULL.
>>    */
>>   void bdrv_unfreeze_backing_chain(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockDriverState 
>> *base)
>>   {
>>   BlockDriverState *i;
>> -    for (i = bs; i != base && i->backing; i = backing_bs(i)) {
>> -    assert(i->backing->frozen);
>> -    i->backing->frozen = false;
>> +    for (i = bs; i != base; i = backing_bs(i)) {
>> +    if (i->backing) {
>> +    assert(i->backing->frozen);
>> +    i->backing->frozen = false;
>> +    }
>>   }
>>   }
>>
> 
> 


-- 
Best regards,
Vladimir


Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.0 1/3] block: continue until base is found in bdrv_freeze_backing_chain() et al

2019-03-28 Thread Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
26.03.2019 20:07, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> All three functions that handle the BdrvChild.frozen attribute walk
> the backing chain from 'bs' to 'base' and stop either when 'base' is
> found or at the end of the chain if 'base' is NULL.
> 
> However if 'base' is not found then the functions return without
> errors as if it was NULL.
> 
> This is wrong: if the caller passed an incorrect parameter that means
> that there is a bug in the code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alberto Garcia 

interesting that bdrv_is_allocated_above has the same flaw. Could you fix it 
too?

> ---
>   block.c | 21 ++---
>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
> index 0a93ee9ac8..3050854528 100644
> --- a/block.c
> +++ b/block.c
> @@ -4218,14 +4218,15 @@ BlockDriverState *bdrv_find_base(BlockDriverState *bs)
>   /*
>* Return true if at least one of the backing links between @bs and
>* @base is frozen. @errp is set if that's the case.
> + * @base must be reachable from @bs, or NULL.
>*/
>   bool bdrv_is_backing_chain_frozen(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockDriverState 
> *base,
> Error **errp)
>   {
>   BlockDriverState *i;
>   
> -for (i = bs; i != base && i->backing; i = backing_bs(i)) {
> -if (i->backing->frozen) {
> +for (i = bs; i != base; i = backing_bs(i)) {
> +if (i->backing && i->backing->frozen) {
>   error_setg(errp, "Cannot change '%s' link from '%s' to '%s'",
>  i->backing->name, i->node_name,
>  backing_bs(i)->node_name);
> @@ -4240,6 +4241,7 @@ bool bdrv_is_backing_chain_frozen(BlockDriverState *bs, 
> BlockDriverState *base,
>* Freeze all backing links between @bs and @base.
>* If any of the links is already frozen the operation is aborted and
>* none of the links are modified.
> + * @base must be reachable from @bs, or NULL.
>* Returns 0 on success. On failure returns < 0 and sets @errp.
>*/
>   int bdrv_freeze_backing_chain(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockDriverState *base,
> @@ -4251,8 +4253,10 @@ int bdrv_freeze_backing_chain(BlockDriverState *bs, 
> BlockDriverState *base,
>   return -EPERM;
>   }
>   
> -for (i = bs; i != base && i->backing; i = backing_bs(i)) {
> -i->backing->frozen = true;
> +for (i = bs; i != base; i = backing_bs(i)) {
> +if (i->backing) {
> +i->backing->frozen = true;
> +}
>   }
>   
>   return 0;
> @@ -4261,14 +4265,17 @@ int bdrv_freeze_backing_chain(BlockDriverState *bs, 
> BlockDriverState *base,
>   /*
>* Unfreeze all backing links between @bs and @base. The caller must
>* ensure that all links are frozen before using this function.
> + * @base must be reachable from @bs, or NULL.
>*/
>   void bdrv_unfreeze_backing_chain(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockDriverState 
> *base)
>   {
>   BlockDriverState *i;
>   
> -for (i = bs; i != base && i->backing; i = backing_bs(i)) {
> -assert(i->backing->frozen);
> -i->backing->frozen = false;
> +for (i = bs; i != base; i = backing_bs(i)) {
> +if (i->backing) {
> +assert(i->backing->frozen);
> +i->backing->frozen = false;
> +}
>   }
>   }
>   
> 


-- 
Best regards,
Vladimir


Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.0 1/3] block: continue until base is found in bdrv_freeze_backing_chain() et al

2019-03-28 Thread Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
28.03.2019 13:04, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> On Thu 28 Mar 2019 10:45:51 AM CET, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> -for (i = bs; i != base && i->backing; i = backing_bs(i)) {
>>> -if (i->backing->frozen) {
>>> +for (i = bs; i != base; i = backing_bs(i)) {
>>> +if (i->backing && i->backing->frozen) {
>>
>> may be a bit more plain conversion would be just add assert(i == base)
>> after each loop, but I'm OK with this too.
> 
> It's not necessary, because the loop can only stop when i == base
> already, so that assertion is always going to be true.
> 
> If you mean

yes

> that we should keep everything as it was before and simply
> add that assertion then that's not enough. If base == NULL then the loop
> will stop when i->backing == NULL, not when i == base.

and yes, I'm wrong.

> 
> Berto
> 


-- 
Best regards,
Vladimir


Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.0 1/3] block: continue until base is found in bdrv_freeze_backing_chain() et al

2019-03-28 Thread Alberto Garcia
On Thu 28 Mar 2019 10:45:51 AM CET, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> -for (i = bs; i != base && i->backing; i = backing_bs(i)) {
>> -if (i->backing->frozen) {
>> +for (i = bs; i != base; i = backing_bs(i)) {
>> +if (i->backing && i->backing->frozen) {
>
> may be a bit more plain conversion would be just add assert(i == base)
> after each loop, but I'm OK with this too.

It's not necessary, because the loop can only stop when i == base
already, so that assertion is always going to be true.

If you mean that we should keep everything as it was before and simply
add that assertion then that's not enough. If base == NULL then the loop
will stop when i->backing == NULL, not when i == base.

Berto



Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.0 1/3] block: continue until base is found in bdrv_freeze_backing_chain() et al

2019-03-28 Thread Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
26.03.2019 20:07, Alberto Garcia wrote:
> All three functions that handle the BdrvChild.frozen attribute walk
> the backing chain from 'bs' to 'base' and stop either when 'base' is
> found or at the end of the chain if 'base' is NULL.
> 
> However if 'base' is not found then the functions return without
> errors as if it was NULL.
> 
> This is wrong: if the caller passed an incorrect parameter that means
> that there is a bug in the code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alberto Garcia 

Reviewed-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy 

> ---
>   block.c | 21 ++---
>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
> index 0a93ee9ac8..3050854528 100644
> --- a/block.c
> +++ b/block.c
> @@ -4218,14 +4218,15 @@ BlockDriverState *bdrv_find_base(BlockDriverState *bs)
>   /*
>* Return true if at least one of the backing links between @bs and
>* @base is frozen. @errp is set if that's the case.
> + * @base must be reachable from @bs, or NULL.
>*/
>   bool bdrv_is_backing_chain_frozen(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockDriverState 
> *base,
> Error **errp)
>   {
>   BlockDriverState *i;
>   
> -for (i = bs; i != base && i->backing; i = backing_bs(i)) {
> -if (i->backing->frozen) {
> +for (i = bs; i != base; i = backing_bs(i)) {
> +if (i->backing && i->backing->frozen) {

may be a bit more plain conversion would be just add assert(i == base) after 
each loop,
but I'm OK with this too.

>   error_setg(errp, "Cannot change '%s' link from '%s' to '%s'",
>  i->backing->name, i->node_name,
>  backing_bs(i)->node_name);
> @@ -4240,6 +4241,7 @@ bool bdrv_is_backing_chain_frozen(BlockDriverState *bs, 
> BlockDriverState *base,
>* Freeze all backing links between @bs and @base.
>* If any of the links is already frozen the operation is aborted and
>* none of the links are modified.
> + * @base must be reachable from @bs, or NULL.
>* Returns 0 on success. On failure returns < 0 and sets @errp.
>*/
>   int bdrv_freeze_backing_chain(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockDriverState *base,
> @@ -4251,8 +4253,10 @@ int bdrv_freeze_backing_chain(BlockDriverState *bs, 
> BlockDriverState *base,
>   return -EPERM;
>   }
>   
> -for (i = bs; i != base && i->backing; i = backing_bs(i)) {
> -i->backing->frozen = true;
> +for (i = bs; i != base; i = backing_bs(i)) {
> +if (i->backing) {
> +i->backing->frozen = true;
> +}
>   }
>   
>   return 0;
> @@ -4261,14 +4265,17 @@ int bdrv_freeze_backing_chain(BlockDriverState *bs, 
> BlockDriverState *base,
>   /*
>* Unfreeze all backing links between @bs and @base. The caller must
>* ensure that all links are frozen before using this function.
> + * @base must be reachable from @bs, or NULL.
>*/
>   void bdrv_unfreeze_backing_chain(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockDriverState 
> *base)
>   {
>   BlockDriverState *i;
>   
> -for (i = bs; i != base && i->backing; i = backing_bs(i)) {
> -assert(i->backing->frozen);
> -i->backing->frozen = false;
> +for (i = bs; i != base; i = backing_bs(i)) {
> +if (i->backing) {
> +assert(i->backing->frozen);
> +i->backing->frozen = false;
> +}
>   }
>   }
>   
> 


-- 
Best regards,
Vladimir


[Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-4.0 1/3] block: continue until base is found in bdrv_freeze_backing_chain() et al

2019-03-26 Thread Alberto Garcia
All three functions that handle the BdrvChild.frozen attribute walk
the backing chain from 'bs' to 'base' and stop either when 'base' is
found or at the end of the chain if 'base' is NULL.

However if 'base' is not found then the functions return without
errors as if it was NULL.

This is wrong: if the caller passed an incorrect parameter that means
that there is a bug in the code.

Signed-off-by: Alberto Garcia 
---
 block.c | 21 ++---
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
index 0a93ee9ac8..3050854528 100644
--- a/block.c
+++ b/block.c
@@ -4218,14 +4218,15 @@ BlockDriverState *bdrv_find_base(BlockDriverState *bs)
 /*
  * Return true if at least one of the backing links between @bs and
  * @base is frozen. @errp is set if that's the case.
+ * @base must be reachable from @bs, or NULL.
  */
 bool bdrv_is_backing_chain_frozen(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockDriverState *base,
   Error **errp)
 {
 BlockDriverState *i;
 
-for (i = bs; i != base && i->backing; i = backing_bs(i)) {
-if (i->backing->frozen) {
+for (i = bs; i != base; i = backing_bs(i)) {
+if (i->backing && i->backing->frozen) {
 error_setg(errp, "Cannot change '%s' link from '%s' to '%s'",
i->backing->name, i->node_name,
backing_bs(i)->node_name);
@@ -4240,6 +4241,7 @@ bool bdrv_is_backing_chain_frozen(BlockDriverState *bs, 
BlockDriverState *base,
  * Freeze all backing links between @bs and @base.
  * If any of the links is already frozen the operation is aborted and
  * none of the links are modified.
+ * @base must be reachable from @bs, or NULL.
  * Returns 0 on success. On failure returns < 0 and sets @errp.
  */
 int bdrv_freeze_backing_chain(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockDriverState *base,
@@ -4251,8 +4253,10 @@ int bdrv_freeze_backing_chain(BlockDriverState *bs, 
BlockDriverState *base,
 return -EPERM;
 }
 
-for (i = bs; i != base && i->backing; i = backing_bs(i)) {
-i->backing->frozen = true;
+for (i = bs; i != base; i = backing_bs(i)) {
+if (i->backing) {
+i->backing->frozen = true;
+}
 }
 
 return 0;
@@ -4261,14 +4265,17 @@ int bdrv_freeze_backing_chain(BlockDriverState *bs, 
BlockDriverState *base,
 /*
  * Unfreeze all backing links between @bs and @base. The caller must
  * ensure that all links are frozen before using this function.
+ * @base must be reachable from @bs, or NULL.
  */
 void bdrv_unfreeze_backing_chain(BlockDriverState *bs, BlockDriverState *base)
 {
 BlockDriverState *i;
 
-for (i = bs; i != base && i->backing; i = backing_bs(i)) {
-assert(i->backing->frozen);
-i->backing->frozen = false;
+for (i = bs; i != base; i = backing_bs(i)) {
+if (i->backing) {
+assert(i->backing->frozen);
+i->backing->frozen = false;
+}
 }
 }
 
-- 
2.11.0