The intent of having the visitor type_size() callback differ from type_uint64() is to allow special handling for sizes; the visitor core gracefully falls back to type_uint64() if there is no need for the distinction. Since the dealloc visitor does nothing for any of the int visits, drop the pointless size handler.
Signed-off-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> --- v10: new patch, split out from 10/37 --- qapi/qapi-dealloc-visitor.c | 6 ------ 1 file changed, 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/qapi/qapi-dealloc-visitor.c b/qapi/qapi-dealloc-visitor.c index 204de8f..4d1ef93 100644 --- a/qapi/qapi-dealloc-visitor.c +++ b/qapi/qapi-dealloc-visitor.c @@ -158,11 +158,6 @@ static void qapi_dealloc_type_anything(Visitor *v, QObject **obj, } } -static void qapi_dealloc_type_size(Visitor *v, uint64_t *obj, const char *name, - Error **errp) -{ -} - static void qapi_dealloc_type_enum(Visitor *v, int *obj, const char * const strings[], const char *kind, const char *name, @@ -224,7 +219,6 @@ QapiDeallocVisitor *qapi_dealloc_visitor_new(void) v->visitor.type_str = qapi_dealloc_type_str; v->visitor.type_number = qapi_dealloc_type_number; v->visitor.type_any = qapi_dealloc_type_anything; - v->visitor.type_size = qapi_dealloc_type_size; v->visitor.start_union = qapi_dealloc_start_union; QTAILQ_INIT(&v->stack); -- 2.5.0