Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] sd: sdhci: mask transfer mode register value

2017-02-14 Thread P J P 
  Hello Petr,

+-- On Tue, 14 Feb 2017, Peter Maydell wrote --+
| Yes, exactly. (We document this in 
| 
http://wiki.qemu-project.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch#Participating_in_Code_Review
 
| but of course that page is huge...)

  Right, okay. I'll resend the patch set later today.

Thank you.
--
Prasad J Pandit / Red Hat Product Security Team
47AF CE69 3A90 54AA 9045 1053 DD13 3D32 FE5B 041F

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] sd: sdhci: mask transfer mode register value

2017-02-14 Thread Peter Maydell 
On 14 February 2017 at 11:02, P J P  wrote:
>   Hello Peter,
>
> +-- On Tue, 14 Feb 2017, Peter Maydell wrote --+
> | Please keep sending them as a single series, though. Otherwise I
> | won't be able to easily apply them in the right order and track
> | their current status.
>
>   Okay, got it. Ie. to re-send entire series even for change in one of the
> patches?

Yes, exactly. (We document this in
http://wiki.qemu-project.org/Contribute/SubmitAPatch#Participating_in_Code_Review
but of course that page is huge...)

thanks
-- PMM

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] sd: sdhci: mask transfer mode register value

2017-02-14 Thread Peter Maydell 
On 14 February 2017 at 10:44, P J P  wrote:
> +-- On Tue, 14 Feb 2017, Peter Maydell wrote --+
> | What has happened to the other patches that were in this patchset in v3 ?
>
> v3 1/4
>   -> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-02/msg02776.html
>
> v3 3/4
>   -> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-02/msg02775.html
>
> These two are acked.
>
>
> v3 2/4
>   -> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-02/msg02846.html
>   -> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-02/msg02844.html
>
> v3 4/4
>   -> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-02/msg02380.html
>   -> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2017-02/msg01568.html
>
> These two were acked with few changes, which are incorporated in the second
> link above. Acks pending.

Please keep sending them as a single series, though. Otherwise I
won't be able to easily apply them in the right order and track
their current status.

thanks
-- PMM