Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] [PATCH 13/15] target/arm: Create and use new function arm_v7m_is_handler_mode()

2017-08-03 Thread Edgar E. Iglesias
On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 05:43:59PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Add a utility function for testing whether the CPU is in Handler
> mode; this is just a check whether v7m.exception is non-zero, but
> we do it in several places and it makes the code a bit easier
> to read to not have to mentally figure out what the test is testing.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell 



> ---
>  target/arm/cpu.h| 10 --
>  target/arm/helper.c |  8 
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
> index da90b7a..a3b4b78 100644
> --- a/target/arm/cpu.h
> +++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
> @@ -1630,13 +1630,19 @@ static inline int arm_highest_el(CPUARMState *env)
>  return 1;
>  }
>  
> +/* Return true if a v7M CPU is in Handler mode */
> +static inline bool arm_v7m_is_handler_mode(CPUARMState *env)
> +{
> +return env->v7m.exception != 0;

The != 0 shouldn't be needed when you return a bool...
Either way:
Reviewed-by: Edgar E. Iglesias 


> +}
> +
>  /* Return the current Exception Level (as per ARMv8; note that this differs
>   * from the ARMv7 Privilege Level).
>   */
>  static inline int arm_current_el(CPUARMState *env)
>  {
>  if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_M)) {
> -return !((env->v7m.exception == 0) && (env->v7m.control & 1));
> +return arm_v7m_is_handler_mode(env) || !(env->v7m.control & 1);
>  }
>  
>  if (is_a64(env)) {
> @@ -2636,7 +2642,7 @@ static inline void cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(CPUARMState 
> *env, target_ulong *pc,
>  }
>  *flags |= fp_exception_el(env) << ARM_TBFLAG_FPEXC_EL_SHIFT;
>  
> -if (env->v7m.exception != 0) {
> +if (arm_v7m_is_handler_mode(env)) {
>  *flags |= ARM_TBFLAG_HANDLER_MASK;
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c
> index 0ecc8f1..7920153 100644
> --- a/target/arm/helper.c
> +++ b/target/arm/helper.c
> @@ -6147,7 +6147,7 @@ static void do_v7m_exception_exit(ARMCPU *cpu)
>   * that jumps to magic addresses don't have magic behaviour unless
>   * we're in Handler mode (compare pseudocode BXWritePC()).
>   */
> -assert(env->v7m.exception != 0);
> +assert(arm_v7m_is_handler_mode(env));
>  
>  /* In the spec pseudocode ExceptionReturn() is called directly
>   * from BXWritePC() and gets the full target PC value including
> @@ -6254,7 +6254,7 @@ static void do_v7m_exception_exit(ARMCPU *cpu)
>   * resuming in Thread mode. If that doesn't match what the
>   * exception return type specified then this is a UsageFault.
>   */
> -if (return_to_handler == (env->v7m.exception == 0)) {
> +if (return_to_handler != arm_v7m_is_handler_mode(env)) {
>  /* Take an INVPC UsageFault by pushing the stack again. */
>  armv7m_nvic_set_pending(env->nvic, ARMV7M_EXCP_USAGE);
>  env->v7m.cfsr |= R_V7M_CFSR_INVPC_MASK;
> @@ -6405,7 +6405,7 @@ void arm_v7m_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
>  if (env->v7m.control & R_V7M_CONTROL_SPSEL_MASK) {
>  lr |= 4;
>  }
> -if (env->v7m.exception == 0) {
> +if (!arm_v7m_is_handler_mode(env)) {
>  lr |= 8;
>  }
>  
> @@ -8798,7 +8798,7 @@ void HELPER(v7m_msr)(CPUARMState *env, uint32_t 
> maskreg, uint32_t val)
>   * switch_v7m_sp() deals with updating the SPSEL bit in
>   * env->v7m.control, so we only need update the others.
>   */
> -if (env->v7m.exception == 0) {
> +if (!arm_v7m_is_handler_mode(env)) {
>  switch_v7m_sp(env, (val & R_V7M_CONTROL_SPSEL_MASK) != 0);
>  }
>  env->v7m.control &= ~R_V7M_CONTROL_NPRIV_MASK;
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 
> 



Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-arm] [PATCH 13/15] target/arm: Create and use new function arm_v7m_is_handler_mode()

2017-08-02 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé

On 08/02/2017 01:43 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:

Add a utility function for testing whether the CPU is in Handler
mode; this is just a check whether v7m.exception is non-zero, but
we do it in several places and it makes the code a bit easier
to read to not have to mentally figure out what the test is testing.


<3 <3 <3



Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell 


Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé 


---
  target/arm/cpu.h| 10 --
  target/arm/helper.c |  8 
  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/target/arm/cpu.h b/target/arm/cpu.h
index da90b7a..a3b4b78 100644
--- a/target/arm/cpu.h
+++ b/target/arm/cpu.h
@@ -1630,13 +1630,19 @@ static inline int arm_highest_el(CPUARMState *env)
  return 1;
  }
  
+/* Return true if a v7M CPU is in Handler mode */

+static inline bool arm_v7m_is_handler_mode(CPUARMState *env)
+{
+return env->v7m.exception != 0;
+}
+
  /* Return the current Exception Level (as per ARMv8; note that this differs
   * from the ARMv7 Privilege Level).
   */
  static inline int arm_current_el(CPUARMState *env)
  {
  if (arm_feature(env, ARM_FEATURE_M)) {
-return !((env->v7m.exception == 0) && (env->v7m.control & 1));
+return arm_v7m_is_handler_mode(env) || !(env->v7m.control & 1);
  }
  
  if (is_a64(env)) {

@@ -2636,7 +2642,7 @@ static inline void cpu_get_tb_cpu_state(CPUARMState *env, 
target_ulong *pc,
  }
  *flags |= fp_exception_el(env) << ARM_TBFLAG_FPEXC_EL_SHIFT;
  
-if (env->v7m.exception != 0) {

+if (arm_v7m_is_handler_mode(env)) {
  *flags |= ARM_TBFLAG_HANDLER_MASK;
  }
  
diff --git a/target/arm/helper.c b/target/arm/helper.c

index 0ecc8f1..7920153 100644
--- a/target/arm/helper.c
+++ b/target/arm/helper.c
@@ -6147,7 +6147,7 @@ static void do_v7m_exception_exit(ARMCPU *cpu)
   * that jumps to magic addresses don't have magic behaviour unless
   * we're in Handler mode (compare pseudocode BXWritePC()).
   */
-assert(env->v7m.exception != 0);
+assert(arm_v7m_is_handler_mode(env));
  
  /* In the spec pseudocode ExceptionReturn() is called directly

   * from BXWritePC() and gets the full target PC value including
@@ -6254,7 +6254,7 @@ static void do_v7m_exception_exit(ARMCPU *cpu)
   * resuming in Thread mode. If that doesn't match what the
   * exception return type specified then this is a UsageFault.
   */
-if (return_to_handler == (env->v7m.exception == 0)) {
+if (return_to_handler != arm_v7m_is_handler_mode(env)) {
  /* Take an INVPC UsageFault by pushing the stack again. */
  armv7m_nvic_set_pending(env->nvic, ARMV7M_EXCP_USAGE);
  env->v7m.cfsr |= R_V7M_CFSR_INVPC_MASK;
@@ -6405,7 +6405,7 @@ void arm_v7m_cpu_do_interrupt(CPUState *cs)
  if (env->v7m.control & R_V7M_CONTROL_SPSEL_MASK) {
  lr |= 4;
  }
-if (env->v7m.exception == 0) {
+if (!arm_v7m_is_handler_mode(env)) {
  lr |= 8;
  }
  
@@ -8798,7 +8798,7 @@ void HELPER(v7m_msr)(CPUARMState *env, uint32_t maskreg, uint32_t val)

   * switch_v7m_sp() deals with updating the SPSEL bit in
   * env->v7m.control, so we only need update the others.
   */
-if (env->v7m.exception == 0) {
+if (!arm_v7m_is_handler_mode(env)) {
  switch_v7m_sp(env, (val & R_V7M_CONTROL_SPSEL_MASK) != 0);
  }
  env->v7m.control &= ~R_V7M_CONTROL_NPRIV_MASK;