[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 00/19] RFC: Reporting QEMU binary capabilities

2010-06-07 Thread Paolo Bonzini

On 06/07/2010 04:58 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:


A query-argv is a really bad idea IMHO.


Agreed.  Instead we should work towards improve the configurability of 
QEMU via monitor commands or -readconfig.  libvirt is already using 
-nodefaults on recent QEMU, so this is not _that_ far away.


Paolo



[Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 00/19] RFC: Reporting QEMU binary capabilities

2010-06-07 Thread Anthony Liguori

On 06/07/2010 11:02 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:

On 06/07/2010 04:58 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:


A query-argv is a really bad idea IMHO.


Agreed.  Instead we should work towards improve the configurability of 
QEMU via monitor commands or -readconfig.  libvirt is already using 
-nodefaults on recent QEMU, so this is not _that_ far away.


I've also got a series that's just about ready to go based on Glauber's 
-machine option which converts quite a lot of existing options to config 
based.


Regards,

Anthony Liguori


Paolo