Re: [PATCH] tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines: Fix ppc64 tests for binaries without slirp

2023-06-07 Thread Alex Bennée


Thomas Huth  writes:

> The ppc64 tuxrun tests are currently failing if "slirp" has been
> disabled in the binary since they are using "-netdev user" now.
> We have to skip the test if this network backend is missing.
>
> Fixes: 6ee3624236 ("improve code coverage for ppc64")
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth 

Acked-by: Alex Bennée 

-- 
Alex Bennée
Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro



Re: [PATCH] tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines: Fix ppc64 tests for binaries without slirp

2023-06-07 Thread Daniel Henrique Barboza




On 6/6/23 16:28, Thomas Huth wrote:

The ppc64 tuxrun tests are currently failing if "slirp" has been
disabled in the binary since they are using "-netdev user" now.
We have to skip the test if this network backend is missing.

Fixes: 6ee3624236 ("improve code coverage for ppc64")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth 
---


Queued in gitlab.com/danielhb/qemu/tree/ppc-next. Thanks,


Daniel


  tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py | 1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py 
b/tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py
index 3a46e7a745..e12250eabb 100644
--- a/tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py
+++ b/tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py
@@ -184,6 +184,7 @@ def common_tuxrun(self,
  
  def ppc64_common_tuxrun(self, sums, prefix):

  # add device args to command line.
+self.require_netdev('user')
  self.vm.add_args('-netdev', 'user,id=vnet,hostfwd=:127.0.0.1:0-:22',
   '-device', 'virtio-net,netdev=vnet')
  self.vm.add_args('-netdev', '{"type":"user","id":"hostnet0"}',




Re: [PATCH] tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines: Fix ppc64 tests for binaries without slirp

2023-06-07 Thread Thomas Huth

On 07/06/2023 06.22, Joel Stanley wrote:

On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 at 19:28, Thomas Huth  wrote:


The ppc64 tuxrun tests are currently failing if "slirp" has been
disabled in the binary since they are using "-netdev user" now.
We have to skip the test if this network backend is missing.


Do the boot tests require networking? I doubt they do.

You could instead remove the -netdev user option if slirp is not present.


Yes, that's an option. Not sure whether it's worth the effort here, though, 
since most of our CI pipelines run with slirp enabled anyway (it's just one 
job, avocado-cfi-ppc64-s390x, which is failing due to this missing check)


 Thomas



Fixes: 6ee3624236 ("improve code coverage for ppc64")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth 
---
  tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py | 1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py 
b/tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py
index 3a46e7a745..e12250eabb 100644
--- a/tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py
+++ b/tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py
@@ -184,6 +184,7 @@ def common_tuxrun(self,

  def ppc64_common_tuxrun(self, sums, prefix):
  # add device args to command line.
+self.require_netdev('user')
  self.vm.add_args('-netdev', 'user,id=vnet,hostfwd=:127.0.0.1:0-:22',
   '-device', 'virtio-net,netdev=vnet')
  self.vm.add_args('-netdev', '{"type":"user","id":"hostnet0"}',
--
2.31.1









Re: [PATCH] tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines: Fix ppc64 tests for binaries without slirp

2023-06-06 Thread Joel Stanley
On Tue, 6 Jun 2023 at 19:28, Thomas Huth  wrote:
>
> The ppc64 tuxrun tests are currently failing if "slirp" has been
> disabled in the binary since they are using "-netdev user" now.
> We have to skip the test if this network backend is missing.

Do the boot tests require networking? I doubt they do.

You could instead remove the -netdev user option if slirp is not present.


>
> Fixes: 6ee3624236 ("improve code coverage for ppc64")
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth 
> ---
>  tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py 
> b/tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py
> index 3a46e7a745..e12250eabb 100644
> --- a/tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py
> +++ b/tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py
> @@ -184,6 +184,7 @@ def common_tuxrun(self,
>
>  def ppc64_common_tuxrun(self, sums, prefix):
>  # add device args to command line.
> +self.require_netdev('user')
>  self.vm.add_args('-netdev', 'user,id=vnet,hostfwd=:127.0.0.1:0-:22',
>   '-device', 'virtio-net,netdev=vnet')
>  self.vm.add_args('-netdev', '{"type":"user","id":"hostnet0"}',
> --
> 2.31.1
>
>



Re: [PATCH] tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines: Fix ppc64 tests for binaries without slirp

2023-06-06 Thread Daniel Henrique Barboza




On 6/6/23 16:28, Thomas Huth wrote:

The ppc64 tuxrun tests are currently failing if "slirp" has been
disabled in the binary since they are using "-netdev user" now.
We have to skip the test if this network backend is missing.

Fixes: 6ee3624236 ("improve code coverage for ppc64")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth 
---


Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza 

Thomas, let me know if you need me to queue this up. I'll send a PR in the
next few days.


Daniel


  tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py | 1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py 
b/tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py
index 3a46e7a745..e12250eabb 100644
--- a/tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py
+++ b/tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py
@@ -184,6 +184,7 @@ def common_tuxrun(self,
  
  def ppc64_common_tuxrun(self, sums, prefix):

  # add device args to command line.
+self.require_netdev('user')
  self.vm.add_args('-netdev', 'user,id=vnet,hostfwd=:127.0.0.1:0-:22',
   '-device', 'virtio-net,netdev=vnet')
  self.vm.add_args('-netdev', '{"type":"user","id":"hostnet0"}',




Re: [PATCH] tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines: Fix ppc64 tests for binaries without slirp

2023-06-06 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé

On 6/6/23 21:28, Thomas Huth wrote:

The ppc64 tuxrun tests are currently failing if "slirp" has been
disabled in the binary since they are using "-netdev user" now.
We have to skip the test if this network backend is missing.

Fixes: 6ee3624236 ("improve code coverage for ppc64")
Signed-off-by: Thomas Huth 
---
  tests/avocado/tuxrun_baselines.py | 1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)


Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé